The Auckland terror attack on 3 Sept 2021 that resulted
in the death of the terrorist Ahamed Samsudeen and seriously injured seven innocent
people, could have been prevented. The event presents as a seminal case study into
how society attempts but fails to prevent crime using policing, and evidence of
the failure here can help define a blueprint for change.
Policing is responsible for crime prevention alongside
its core law enforcement role, but it does not and cannot prevent crime. Unaware
of this fault, it continues to covet the role by defending its failures and influencing
law changes that do not enhance its prevention value. The most vexing consequence
is policing’s ability to control the message that allows it to obstruct the fault
from lawmakers who are then unable to expose and remedy it.
But policing demonstrated the critical disconnect
between its dual roles when it ignored an academic-led intervention solution
that could have prevented Samsudeen carrying out his attack in favor of its own
ill-fated law enforcement 24/7 surveillance method that failed.