Is Civil War a real possibility in New Zealand?
Auckland
University’s introduction of a mandatory paper in Māori, has certainly caught
the attention of a tranche of New Zealander’s who appeared to have previously
tolerated persistent Māori claims for more and more of the Land of the Long
Black Cloud.
Such an intrusion impacts on the core values and beliefs of us all.
In a previous
article I penned:
“As
long as John Key keeps his nose out of National Party
Conferences and ACT and NZ First maintain their pre-elections pledges, civil
war in New Zealand, is unlikely in my view – irrespective of whatever a
minority of Māori claim.” (1)
Notwithstanding
this optimistic outlook, one ignores at one’s peril, the political aspirations
of the cabal of radical Māori pseudo leaders who threaten civil war to grab
power by a form of revolution, imposing Māori lore as the fundamental pillar of
New Zealand’s constitution – yet to be designed.
Revolutionaries
are invariably political Utopians and as such, do not recognise the natural
limitations of human tolerance, as they strive for goals which cannot be
obtained. To achieve the goals of
revolutionaries, a nation must pay a heavy price.
Revolution
means destruction of values, material security, and lives.
As Lenin
insisted during the October Revolutions February and October 1917, which
overturned the Tsar’s monarchy, in Russia:
“How
can you make revolution without firing squads?
If we can’t shoot saboteurs, what kind of evolution is this?” (2)
From Mexico
1911, Turkey 1919, Yugoslavia 1941, China both in 1911 and 1946-49, Egypt 1952,
Iraq 1958, Cuba 1959, to Iran 1979 (Africa and South America excluded), these
nations witnessed the overturning autocratic regimes for various
interpretations of Marxism or rule by bureaucracy and police.
Ionically,
these quasi-Marxist regimes delivered not power to the people, but merely
replaced one autocratic regime with another.
These
examples also provide hard evidence that imposition of a new reign of political
power via revolution, brought with it, changes which to this day, delivers
suffering and in turn sustains latent if not open, hatred and quests for vengeance.
Essentially,
what some Māori now seek to impose upon New Zealand, is another version of Marxist
socialism – Tribal hierarchies – i.e. political paradigms midst which any
evidence of “trickle down” benefits to the disciples who languish in State
Housing and unemployed, is hard to find.
From the
empires of Ngāi Tahu in the south to Tainui in the north, commercial and
property assets exceeding a billion dollars at least, seem to be firmly under
the control of an elite few – while the bloke sweeping, the streets in
Ngāruawāhia and the woman packing shelves in Invercargill – just keeps on
sweeping and continues stacking.
Meanwhile,
also latent but lurking, will be “others” who represent the majority of New
Zealand, taken from White, Asian, Indian and also Polynesian, resentful and
seeking restoration of their right for equality before the LAW –and not
subservience to Māori Lore.
Ross
Meurant BA
MPP Former Police
Inspector. Former Member of Parliament. Former Diplomatic Representative.
Current partner www.gena.co.nz
(2) Montefiore, Simon Sebag; Young Stalin, Phoenix, 2007.
3 comments:
The battle we the people face today, which has its beginnings with the 1975 TOW Act is, New Zealand under one flag and one law for all, verses apartheid Aotearoa.
The irony here is that the 'trickle down' model of socioeconomic development is usually pooh-poohed by the left.
No risk.With the armed forces and Poice saturated by trace maori, maori in control of RNZ, kapahaka trained groups to threaten the population, and the gangs availablale, the revoltion will be acheived by simple coup.
Post a Comment