This production — article — played at the Performing Arts Centre in Raumati a few years back. I didn’t go, but I gather it was a very one-sided view of what happened at Parihaka. Nicola Easthope is a good lady but she has been indoctrinated by Paora Trim who is Head of Maori at Kapiti College. I guess people have to make up their own minds.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1dedc/1dedc06288490c0f8151f4685b62b73372e69182" alt=""
Have a look at the following articles.
The activities of the South Taranaki Maori settlement and its occupation by the Armed Constabulary on 5 November 1881 have a special place in our history. It features prominently in history books and online, and is often mentioned by the media and commemorated in music, drama, art and dance. There is even a Parihaka Day called the “Day of Plunder”.
Much has been written about the passive resistance to settler land development, which was initiated by the Prophets Te Whiti and Tohu, near Parihaka in the 1870s. These Maori leaders are seen as iconic heroes, preaching peace and standing up to an unreasonable and oppressive government.
Furthermore, there has been general condemnation of the “invasion” of the peaceful settlement in 1881 by a large armed force of about 1600 Armed Constabulary and Volunteers, led by Native Minister John Bryce.
But have we been getting a full and balanced account of Parihaka and its history?
John McLean has written a number of books on New Zealand history and in Parihaka: The Facts he sets out to untangle the myths about the community, its activities and the 1881 occupation by government forces.
Using the observations of Maori and non-Maori from the time, the words of Te Whiti himself, contemporary newspaper reports and accounts by eminent historians such as James Cowan, the author’s interesting and informative book is soundly based on thorough research and the facts of what happened.
Putting Te Whiti in perspective
The prophet was fundamentally a man of peace, but was also a prominent member of the Pai Marire (Hauhau) Movement which was often involved in violence and had, as one of its goals, driving European settlers from the country. Te Whiti and Tohu established and independent “state” at Parihaka and refused to negotiate with the government which wanted a peaceful resolution to the complicated land issues in Taranaki.
The prophets drew large number of Taranaki Maori to the village and this annoyed other iwi in the region as there was a drain of people and resources from their communities. The prophets held regular feasts and Maori who came to live in the village were required to bring gifts as well as food contributions for the regular feasts. Both men became very wealthy.
The passive resistance that was carried out in South Taranaki was generally peaceful, but did involve some violence, vandalism and pillaging. One murder was committed and the culprit Wiremu Hiroki was subsequently sheltered at Parihaka. The warrior chief Titokowaru, who had practised cannibalism during his 1868-69 rebellion in South Taranaki, also found sanctuary in the village.
Much is made of Maori being driven out of Parihaka after the occupation and the plundering of the village, however it was only the people from other iwi who had come to live at Parihaka who were sent home. Their temporary whare were destroyed and the homes of genuine Parihaka people, with some exceptions, were not plundered. There was a search for weapons and those that were found were taken away. Te Whiti and Tohu, and others legitimate Parihaka residents, who were taken prisoner, were later allowed to return to the village.
The author acknowledges that Te Whiti, despite his links with the Hauhau, was fundamentally a man of peace and his instructions to his people not to resist the armed occupation was a key reason why the only casualty was a boy having his foot stood on by a horse. The size of the government’s occupying force was another reason why there were no casualties.
Putting the record straight
Parihaka: The Facts is an important and very readable book which examines the myths and legends surrounding Te Whiti, Tohu and Parihaka. The author looks closely at the evidence suggesting Te Whiti actually wanted the government forces to come to the village. He also examines the allegations of rape which only surfaced over 40 years later in the 1920s, and covers the waning of Te Whiti’s popularity after he returned to the settlement.
A useful addition to the main text are two Appendices – one on the amount of land confiscated after the conflicts of the 1860s and the not well known detail on the approximately 50% that was returned. The other appendix covers the interesting history of the Armed Constabulary.
John McLean’s enlightening book should be read by anyone wanting an honest and unbiased account of what actually happened in this much heralded Taranaki settlement in the last quarter of the 19th century.
(Parihaka: The Facts by John McLean is published by Tross Publishing. It is available for $30 from Paper Plus and can also be bought online.)
Roger Childs is a writer and freelance journalist. He is a former history and geography teacher, who wrote or co-authored 10 school textbooks. This article was first published HERE
Parihaka summary by Kerry Bolton
Te Whiti and his cult had powerful allies, including sections of the news media, missionaries and even the Governor, Sir Arthur Gordon, who vilified Native Minster John Bryce for belatedly acting after years of Government inaction in the face of vandalism against settlers farms, and veiled – metaphorical – threats by Te Whiti that all Pakeha would be driven from New Zealand, coining paradoxical terms like ‘a fighting peace’.
Te Whiti spoke in apocalyptic terms, and drew in particular on the Book of Revelation. In this manner he offered a choice of two roads to the Maori – salvation by following him or perdition. Maoris were urged to sell their possessions, give what they had to Te Whiti, and settle in Parihaka. To the great dismay of many chiefs, Maori settlements were being denuded of both people and crops. Te Whiti was wreaking havoc on Maori communities. Huge feast days became ever more frequent and demanding, where Maori followers would supply the food then pay Te Whiti for the privilege of eating it. Te Whiti and his associate Tohu accumulated enormous wealth. Gambling and the sale of gut-rot illegal grog were commonplace there.
Among Te Whiti’s prophecies was the coming of a Great Comet that would portend the End, and only Parihaka would be a safe haven. He also prophesied that he would be martyred, rise on the third day, and that he would be worshipped by Pakeha while the evil would be killed. He was prophesying his martyrdom Jim Jones-style days before the Government troops entered Parihaka.
The Government spent many years trying to negotiate with Te Whiti, but he refused. The question of land sales in Taranaki was like elsewhere – one of chaos, as chiefs vied with each as claimants of ownership based on the customs of conquest. Te Whiti was never interested in a settling of grievances.
Such was the vandalism, threats, extortion and theft by Te Whiti’s followers that in exasperation at Government inaction in 1879 Hawera declared itself a republic and formed its own militia. Those who acted in such manner were called ‘holy martyrs’ by Te Whiti. Parihaka was a haven for criminals, including murderers such as Hiroki, who was not captured until Bryce’s entry into Parihaka. Other followers of Te Whiti were the cannibal cult leader Titokowaru, of the Hau Hau, now described by school texts as a ‘great and peaceful leader of the Taranaki people’.
Parihaka was the subject of periodic epidemics because it was filth ridden; the Government health authorities intervened. This was difficult because the residents had faith in Te Whiti’s self-proclaimed miraculous healing abilities.
Bryce at last acted on 5 November 1881, after Te Whiti ignored a request to surrender. If he had turned himself over for trial, along with the murderers Hiroki and Titokawaru, there would have been no ‘invasion’. Allegations of impropriety including especially rape against the soldiers are
unlikely. There were reporters in Parihaka, while a crowd of spectators looked on Parihaka from a hilltop. Despite close scrutiny by the press, there were no reports of rape, looting or slaughter of livestock, which later became part of the Parihaka legend.
When Te Whiti and Tohu both died in 1907 the Young Maori Party regarded it as an opportunity to rid Maori of the influence, calling Te Whiti a ‘fraud’. It was also the opinion of Tohu’s son-in-law Homi, who regarded both as ‘deceivers’.
Te Whiti spoke in apocalyptic terms, and drew in particular on the Book of Revelation. In this manner he offered a choice of two roads to the Maori – salvation by following him or perdition. Maoris were urged to sell their possessions, give what they had to Te Whiti, and settle in Parihaka. To the great dismay of many chiefs, Maori settlements were being denuded of both people and crops. Te Whiti was wreaking havoc on Maori communities. Huge feast days became ever more frequent and demanding, where Maori followers would supply the food then pay Te Whiti for the privilege of eating it. Te Whiti and his associate Tohu accumulated enormous wealth. Gambling and the sale of gut-rot illegal grog were commonplace there.
Among Te Whiti’s prophecies was the coming of a Great Comet that would portend the End, and only Parihaka would be a safe haven. He also prophesied that he would be martyred, rise on the third day, and that he would be worshipped by Pakeha while the evil would be killed. He was prophesying his martyrdom Jim Jones-style days before the Government troops entered Parihaka.
The Government spent many years trying to negotiate with Te Whiti, but he refused. The question of land sales in Taranaki was like elsewhere – one of chaos, as chiefs vied with each as claimants of ownership based on the customs of conquest. Te Whiti was never interested in a settling of grievances.
Such was the vandalism, threats, extortion and theft by Te Whiti’s followers that in exasperation at Government inaction in 1879 Hawera declared itself a republic and formed its own militia. Those who acted in such manner were called ‘holy martyrs’ by Te Whiti. Parihaka was a haven for criminals, including murderers such as Hiroki, who was not captured until Bryce’s entry into Parihaka. Other followers of Te Whiti were the cannibal cult leader Titokowaru, of the Hau Hau, now described by school texts as a ‘great and peaceful leader of the Taranaki people’.
Parihaka was the subject of periodic epidemics because it was filth ridden; the Government health authorities intervened. This was difficult because the residents had faith in Te Whiti’s self-proclaimed miraculous healing abilities.
Bryce at last acted on 5 November 1881, after Te Whiti ignored a request to surrender. If he had turned himself over for trial, along with the murderers Hiroki and Titokawaru, there would have been no ‘invasion’. Allegations of impropriety including especially rape against the soldiers are
unlikely. There were reporters in Parihaka, while a crowd of spectators looked on Parihaka from a hilltop. Despite close scrutiny by the press, there were no reports of rape, looting or slaughter of livestock, which later became part of the Parihaka legend.
When Te Whiti and Tohu both died in 1907 the Young Maori Party regarded it as an opportunity to rid Maori of the influence, calling Te Whiti a ‘fraud’. It was also the opinion of Tohu’s son-in-law Homi, who regarded both as ‘deceivers’.
Book on Parihaka Myths and Legends Review by Roger Childs
The activities of the South Taranaki Maori settlement and its occupation by the Armed Constabulary on 5 November 1881 have a special place in our history. It features prominently in history books and online, and is often mentioned by the media and commemorated in music, drama, art and dance. There is even a Parihaka Day called the “Day of Plunder”.
Much has been written about the passive resistance to settler land development, which was initiated by the Prophets Te Whiti and Tohu, near Parihaka in the 1870s. These Maori leaders are seen as iconic heroes, preaching peace and standing up to an unreasonable and oppressive government.
Furthermore, there has been general condemnation of the “invasion” of the peaceful settlement in 1881 by a large armed force of about 1600 Armed Constabulary and Volunteers, led by Native Minister John Bryce.
But have we been getting a full and balanced account of Parihaka and its history?
A new Parihaka book giving the facts
John McLean has written a number of books on New Zealand history and in Parihaka: The Facts he sets out to untangle the myths about the community, its activities and the 1881 occupation by government forces.
Using the observations of Maori and non-Maori from the time, the words of Te Whiti himself, contemporary newspaper reports and accounts by eminent historians such as James Cowan, the author’s interesting and informative book is soundly based on thorough research and the facts of what happened.
Putting Te Whiti in perspective
The prophet was fundamentally a man of peace, but was also a prominent member of the Pai Marire (Hauhau) Movement which was often involved in violence and had, as one of its goals, driving European settlers from the country. Te Whiti and Tohu established and independent “state” at Parihaka and refused to negotiate with the government which wanted a peaceful resolution to the complicated land issues in Taranaki.
The prophets drew large number of Taranaki Maori to the village and this annoyed other iwi in the region as there was a drain of people and resources from their communities. The prophets held regular feasts and Maori who came to live in the village were required to bring gifts as well as food contributions for the regular feasts. Both men became very wealthy.
The passive resistance that was carried out in South Taranaki was generally peaceful, but did involve some violence, vandalism and pillaging. One murder was committed and the culprit Wiremu Hiroki was subsequently sheltered at Parihaka. The warrior chief Titokowaru, who had practised cannibalism during his 1868-69 rebellion in South Taranaki, also found sanctuary in the village.
Much is made of Maori being driven out of Parihaka after the occupation and the plundering of the village, however it was only the people from other iwi who had come to live at Parihaka who were sent home. Their temporary whare were destroyed and the homes of genuine Parihaka people, with some exceptions, were not plundered. There was a search for weapons and those that were found were taken away. Te Whiti and Tohu, and others legitimate Parihaka residents, who were taken prisoner, were later allowed to return to the village.
The author acknowledges that Te Whiti, despite his links with the Hauhau, was fundamentally a man of peace and his instructions to his people not to resist the armed occupation was a key reason why the only casualty was a boy having his foot stood on by a horse. The size of the government’s occupying force was another reason why there were no casualties.
Putting the record straight
Parihaka: The Facts is an important and very readable book which examines the myths and legends surrounding Te Whiti, Tohu and Parihaka. The author looks closely at the evidence suggesting Te Whiti actually wanted the government forces to come to the village. He also examines the allegations of rape which only surfaced over 40 years later in the 1920s, and covers the waning of Te Whiti’s popularity after he returned to the settlement.
A useful addition to the main text are two Appendices – one on the amount of land confiscated after the conflicts of the 1860s and the not well known detail on the approximately 50% that was returned. The other appendix covers the interesting history of the Armed Constabulary.
John McLean’s enlightening book should be read by anyone wanting an honest and unbiased account of what actually happened in this much heralded Taranaki settlement in the last quarter of the 19th century.
(Parihaka: The Facts by John McLean is published by Tross Publishing. It is available for $30 from Paper Plus and can also be bought online.)
Roger Childs is a writer and freelance journalist. He is a former history and geography teacher, who wrote or co-authored 10 school textbooks. This article was first published HERE
7 comments:
And let's not forget that in the runup to Parihaka the Maoris had been slaughtering each other in the tens of thousands. Were's the hurt and grievance for that.? There are now a number of books from Tross Publishing which claim to be fact based and which contradict present Maori grievance. Either they are a pile of flat-out lies or the Maori grievance industry is a nonsense. Yet we are allowing that to determine the direction of our country. In my opinion, it is total madness.
A good place to start the week would be to sign Abolish the Maori Seats petition available on Breaking Views front page.
I request that each NZCPR supporter ensure they sign and introduce one other person because the petition is languishing and needs a boost before presentation to parliament.
Do you have the location of the petition correct? There is nothing I can locate on NZCPR. There is something on the the Parliament petitions pages to "Remove Māori electorates": https://petitions.parliament.nz/d61fab3d-3766-4343-c409-08dd17f0dfb0 which has a paltry 638 signatures. Not surprising, many do not know it exists and it is obvious that our parliamentarians don't do anything meaningful as a result of petitions anyway.
Oh, Roger, this can't be so? All those words and not even a single mention of the "holocaust" that so vividly was relayed repeatedly by the late, great, Dame Tariana Turia. The reliability of Maori word of mouth is beyond question - just ask the Waitangi Tribunal.
There are 12,800 signatures so you may either NOT receive the NZCPR meme weekly or are viewing by phone that may not have the full NZCPR page showing where the Peition is .Try NZCPR first as the Breaking Views is available from NZCPR. thank you.
I had only heard the Maori sanitized version of Parihaka when I visited it decades ago,. I always suspected it was not the whole truth so good to read this account.
As I have said before , I believe there was early on a European commitment to tone down the real nature of Maori wrst cannibalism, and bloody - inter tribal warfare especially for children in order to help integration. . My grandfather , a Wesleyan wrote old primary Whitcombe and Tombs histories for schools and seldom mentioned cannibalism in them for children's sensibilities perhaps and to prevent nightmares.
I believe this sanitizing may have now back fired but there is no excuse for adults and teenagers not to hear the truth..
Ah thanks, I was simply reading the blog
Post a Comment