Pages

Sunday, May 11, 2025

Chris McVeigh KC: Radio NZ


The brick wall has yet to be built that will yield to the pressure of the beating heads complaining over Radio New Zealand's lefty bias.

You will wait in vain to hear on RNZ any semblance of support for a policy or idea promulgated by the National Party. I venture to suggest that a devout believer awaiting the arrival of the second coming would have a greater chance of success.

RNZ's modus operandi in papering over the cracks of their prejudice is delightfully simple: the coalition announces a policy, say the removal of subsidies on electric vehicles. RNZ's researchers swing into action. They immediately cast about for some 'expert' on the topic in hand, someone who is reliably and vehemently opposed to the idea - usually, and predictably, from the local university. Having snared their man or (I should say in the interests of balance) their woman, they then broadcast an item on the topic. This usually consists of a brief mention of the policy, followed by a lengthy interview with the dispassionate observer in which the policy is eviscerated for all time.

Thus is RNZ's statutory obligation to provide balance in their programming fulfilled. It rather takes your breath away, with its deceptive simplicity, doesn't it?

Another of their favourite ploys is the ostrich gambit. If an item of news is disadvantageous to the political left, ignore it. As often as not this will involve a negative poll result or a particularly salacious piece of gossip concerning an MP.

Of course sometimes the news item is so important or prominent that even RNZ can't pretend it doesn't exist: you know, a transgender pope or Princess Diana's death or some such.

In that event they exercise the well-known 'shift and block' technique, whereby prominence is given to that part of the story which is least harmful to their chosen cause; and the balance is given second billing.

There was a good example of this recently when an opinion poll came out which was favourable to the coalition. The chosen line by RNZ was that the poll showed that support for Christopher Hipkins was increasing. The fact that it clearly demonstrated that the coalition would win an election in a canter was rather tacked on as an afterthought.

There are signs however that the worm could be turning and the jig may be up. Of recent memory, there was a rather ill-tempered exchange between Corin Dann and Winston Peters (disclosure: Corin is my son in law). Peters took to Dann over open sights in what can only be described as the broadcasting equivalent of the Mike Tyson ear biting incident. As could be expected, Dann defended his position stoutly. What was of interest though was RNZ's po faced response to the whole affair. Instead of taking it on the chin so to speak and dealing with Peters' attack on its merits or lack of them, depending on your point of view, RNZ hastily released a statement in which they piously rehearsed their own virtues and extolled their self-evident reputation for impartiality.

The air was redolent with the unmistakable odour of hubris.

Mediawatch is one of RNZ's flagship programmes. A recent edition of this included an interview between the presenter (Hayden Donnell) and Michael Wood, a former Labour party cabinet minister and current union secretary. A man who, without putting too fine a point on it would be unlikely to share many of the interests of, say, Jacob Rees-Mogg.

The interview concerned the recent debate over the board and shareholding of NZME a topic not without a degree of controversy. Was there any attempt to achieve proper balance? Was a dissenting voice raised in even querulous opposition? As they used to say at journalism school, not on your Nelly.

I once heard someone asked if he ever listened to Mediawatch. He replied, "If I want to hear some self-righteous bastard preaching to me on Sunday mornings, I'll go to church thanks."

Chris McVeigh is a retired KC living in Christchurch. He was previously President of the Canterbury District Law Society and, in an earlier life, a scriptwriter and performer for the satirical TV programme ‘A week of It’. This article was first published HERE

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

You forgot.
They keep referring to some country I can’t find anywhere.

Anonymous said...

I read the Otago Daily Times yesterday and the editorial really aggravated me for extraordinary bias. It talked about the Coalition Government as having no moral compass. There was more but it irks that the media were silent on everything the last Government did.

CXH said...

In all fairness to RNZ, it is hard to see much policy from National that deserve much positive news.

They love iwi, they love climate change, they love spending, they love big banks, they love big government. The only thing they are on record as not liking is equality before the law.

So I can understand the RNZ attitude.

Robert Arthur said...

Particularly irritating is the practice of reading out the pleb comments of pleb listeners. I must have heard on at least twenty occasions reference to tax cuts for landlords (when their tax situation was simply restored to that of any other business). It would be interesting to run a computer progam to establish just how many times this been read out.They may as well put sets of routine comments in a barrel and pull out any one.

Anonymous said...

This is one that Trump got right - cut RNZ (and TVNZ) funding until they will start programming that is fair, reasonable, responsible, and racially neutral.

Has Luxon got the gonads to also do this ?

I doubt it - certainly not the person that he portraited before the election.

Gaynor said...

I never listen to RNZ . Just listen to BBC3 which plays classical music, Minimal conflict of views there . Who would involuntary impose high blood pressure on themselves by listening to RNZ?

Anonymous said...

For 50 years my radio was rusted onto RNZ. It’s still rusted on, but I pulled the plug out 5 years ago.

Richard said...

If you are going to comment on Radio NZ shouldn't you actually listen to it instead of joining the frenzy of NZ is lefty/woke. It's just one of those scrambles that people join without bothering about things like facts. Those being that RNZ broadcasts 24/ hours a day with all kinds of programmes and music that are sometimes politics, but mostly not. For example Saturday am is country life, followed by Saturday morning best described as short documentaries on all kind of topics, followed by a programme with a Maori theme, followed by Music 101 that showcases NZ music followed by Saturday evening requests. A competition - spot the leftyness in that line up.

Anonymous said...

Competition; spot the centre or righties in the line-up.

Radio New Zealand (RNZ)** programme hosts active daily and on weekends

### **Weekday Programmes (Morning to Night)**
1. **First Up** (5:00 AM)
- **Nathan Rarere** – News and current affairs to start the day.

2. **Morning Report** (6:00–9:00 AM)
- **Ingrid Hipkiss** and **Corin Dann** – RNZ’s flagship breakfast news show.

3. **Nine to Noon** (9:06 AM–12:00 PM)
- **Kathryn Ryan** – In-depth current affairs and interviews.

4. **Afternoons** (1:06–3:30 PM)
- **Jesse Mulligan** – Mix of lighthearted and serious topics.

5. **Checkpoint** (4:00–6:00 PM)
- **Lisa Owen** – Drive-time news and investigations.

6. **The Panel** (6:00–7:00 PM)
- **Wallace Chapman** – Debates with guests and experts.

7. **Nights** (8:06 PM–12:00 AM)
- **Emile Donovan** – Evening entertainment, quizzes, and interviews.

8. **8 til Late** (Late-night)
- **Corey Fuimaono** and **Ellie Marsden** – Eclectic mix of music and discussions.

---

### **Weekend Programmes**
1. **Saturday Morning** (7:00–11:00 AM)
- **Susie Ferguson** and **Mihi** – Arts, culture, and interviews (e.g., featured segments on literature, climate change, and global issues).

2. **Sunday Morning** (7:00–11:00 AM)
- **Jim Mora** – Long-form interviews and current affairs.

3. **Weekend Afternoons**
- **Various hosts** (e.g., **Mark Amery** for *Culture 101* and **Perlina Lau**) – Focus on arts, music, and culture.

Anonymous said...

Richard, the reason why people have abandoned Radio NZ is that it has been proven to be untrustworthy.

PIJFunding, which they grabbed with both hands despite the requirements to lie and spout indoctrination as they were legally required to do with that funding.
Have you forgotten about the Russian sympathizer who infiltrated RNZ ?
Are you tired of having learn new te reo words that were fabricated last week ?
Would you like to be addressed in English ?
Do you know the new te reo names for our cities ?
Do you honestly believe that RNZ is broadcasting to Maori ? or are they catering for those woke people who have been fully indoctrinated ?

I rest my case.

Robert Arthur said...

It is not just the generally lefty bias but the pro maori and the constant implied link. Sat morning alternates with Mih??gi who is either lefty or pro maori or both, and forever leading her interviewees.. Then Wilcox pro maori. The maori pitched programmes around 6 pm ditto. Wallace Chapman and most of his Panels are left leaning pro maori. The early morning children session weekends tediously features idealistic maori environments. In the night dollops of maoriised music, songs etc. No hint of the relatively cultured light classical music heard 15 and more years ago.