Around 900,000 Kiwis experience food insecurity - it’s a quiet crisis that needs urgent attention
Most New Zealanders are feeling the effects of a seemingly relentless rise in the cost of living – at the supermarket, the petrol pump and in their household energy bills. For some, however, this tips over into what scholars call “food insecurity”.
Perhaps the best way to define this is to look at the internationally accepted definition of its opposite – food security.
This exists when all people, at all times, have physical and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food to meet their dietary needs and preferences for an active and healthy life.
Unfortunately, based on data from the Food Insecurity Experience Scale used by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, New Zealand has seen a clear upward trend in food insecurity.
After falling to 10% in 2015, the rate of moderate or severe food insecurity rose sharply, reaching more than 17% (about 900,000 people) in recent years. And severe food insecurity increased from about 3% in 2014 to around 4% (about 200,000 people) recently.
These figures tell us two things: food insecurity in New Zealand is not a marginal issue, it affects a significant share of the population and the problem is persistent.
Even with fluctuations, the general trend has been upward. The COVID-19 pandemic likely worsened the situation, but the increase began well before 2020. This suggests deeper, structural issues are at play that require long-term solutions.
Food insecurity is worsening
Measuring food insecurity is challenging because it is often hidden and not directly observable. To address this, the FAO’s Food Insecurity Experience Scale began in 2014, the first measure of cross-country, comparable food insecurity at the individual level.
The scale is based on a survey to distinguish between two levels of food insecurity: moderate (ranging from reduced quality and variety of food to experiencing hunger) and severe (physiological hunger).
Globally, progress in reducing food insecurity has recently reversed. After steady declines, moderate and severe food insecurity began rising again around 2017, well before COVID struck.
The pandemic sharply accelerated this trend. By 2021, moderate food insecurity had risen to about 29% globally, and severe food insecurity to about 11% – up from about 21% and 8% respectively in 2014.
Although food insecurity spiked during the pandemic, recent declines mask an underlying trend that predates that period and — as seen in New Zealand — points to deeper structural challenges
Unfortunately, based on data from the Food Insecurity Experience Scale used by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, New Zealand has seen a clear upward trend in food insecurity.
After falling to 10% in 2015, the rate of moderate or severe food insecurity rose sharply, reaching more than 17% (about 900,000 people) in recent years. And severe food insecurity increased from about 3% in 2014 to around 4% (about 200,000 people) recently.
These figures tell us two things: food insecurity in New Zealand is not a marginal issue, it affects a significant share of the population and the problem is persistent.
Even with fluctuations, the general trend has been upward. The COVID-19 pandemic likely worsened the situation, but the increase began well before 2020. This suggests deeper, structural issues are at play that require long-term solutions.
Food insecurity is worsening
Measuring food insecurity is challenging because it is often hidden and not directly observable. To address this, the FAO’s Food Insecurity Experience Scale began in 2014, the first measure of cross-country, comparable food insecurity at the individual level.
The scale is based on a survey to distinguish between two levels of food insecurity: moderate (ranging from reduced quality and variety of food to experiencing hunger) and severe (physiological hunger).
Globally, progress in reducing food insecurity has recently reversed. After steady declines, moderate and severe food insecurity began rising again around 2017, well before COVID struck.
The pandemic sharply accelerated this trend. By 2021, moderate food insecurity had risen to about 29% globally, and severe food insecurity to about 11% – up from about 21% and 8% respectively in 2014.
Although food insecurity spiked during the pandemic, recent declines mask an underlying trend that predates that period and — as seen in New Zealand — points to deeper structural challenges
What predicts food insecurity?
Beyond tracking prevalence, we need to understand the predictors of food insecurity. Why certain groups are more vulnerable is key to designing effective responses. In New Zealand, research indicates the importance of several factors:
- single people face higher food insecurity than those in relationships, possibly due to the lack of shared costs and support
- people living in urban areas are more likely to experience food insecurity, which may reflect higher living costs, housing pressures and uneven access to affordable food
- poor health can increase food insecurity by limiting work opportunities and raising expenses, making food harder to afford
- social disconnection and feeling unsafe in one’s neighbourhood can limit access to food and support services
- people who distrust government or feel excluded from public institutions may avoid available assistance or believe it won’t help them.
This is an important point: food insecurity is not just about low incomes. It is also shaped by life stage and individual circumstances, such as family responsibilities, social networks and health, which affect people’s ability to access and afford food.
Targeted responses, more research
These findings highlight an urgent need for targeted policies, including school feeding programmes and nutrition education that can support adolescents.
For adults, especially those facing unemployment or health challenges, policies should prioritise economic stability, healthcare access and expanded social safety nets. But social protection must reflect food insecurity’s complexity: simply increasing income isn’t enough.
Food insecurity is closely linked to social factors. People with lower social capital or who distrust institutions experience higher risk. Strengthening community networks, rebuilding trust, and improving neighbourhood safety are essential government priorities.
Support should ensure stable food access during life changes such as job loss, care-giving or illness. Conditional cash transfers – direct payments to individuals or households provided they meet certain criteria – should consider household composition and age, while temporary food aid can ease difficult transitions.
The problem in New Zealand is real, rising and more complex than income alone can explain. While we have the tools to measure it reliably, we still lack the depth of understanding needed to design lasting solutions.
Ongoing research is essential to uncover the full picture: who is affected, why, and how best to respond. Only by investing in better evidence can we ensure everyone in New Zealand has access to the food they need to live an active and healthy life.
Dennis is a Senior Lecturer in Economics at the University of Otago, the Vice President of the New Zealand Association of Economists, Editor-in-Chief of New Zealand Economic Papers and Associate Director of the University of Otago’s Economics PhD Programme.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article

7 comments:
How about we stop all the net zero idiocy that puts extra costs on everything, especially our food.
i am very sceptical of these cllaims in NZ. Especially for any who can access a supermarket. Maybe persons not qualifying for any benefit (ie illegal immigarn t)and living solitary in some tiny settlement with access only to a local dairy style shop are in difficu;ty .Has anyone closely studied the income and expenditure patterns and the food of the supposed poor? Anyone above the standard BMI clearly not in basic difficulty.. Western recommended food intakes are hugely lavish; a vast proportion of the world gets by without meat, fish, milk, fresh greens every day..
>"Has anyone closely studied the income and expenditure patterns and the food of the supposed poor?"
You beat me to it, Robert Arthur.
We need to know where food ranks in the list of priorities with regard to spending what money is available.
Also what kind of food money is spent on - I am always amazed to see evidently poor people forking out money for expensive fast food. I can't help wondering sometimes how many of them would be able to produce a nutritious meal from fresh ingredients.
Everyone should watch the BBC doco. entitled , "What are we feeding our kids?". This is about how addictive junk/processed food is and it is alarmingly very addictive , which is revealed by brain scans of those indulging in this low nutritional food. Also because of the low nutritional content people consuming it need to eat more of it. It doesn't make you feel full because of the lack of fiber for example.
But watch the doco. for yourself to see how native children on the Amazon very quickly became obese when commercial groups visited villages touting their addictive junk food. Shamefully in Western Countries there is more research on how to make food more palatable and addictive than on how to make food more nutritional. .
Of course there also needs to be education in school on the benefits of fruit and veges. to replace other nonsense , in the curriculum we all know about, Put pictures of vegetables in children's early readers since sociological forces also crave social action on te reo in them. Posters at health centers should display nutritional information rather than great descriptions of rights and equity. Doctors should be given more lectures on nutrition and the dangers of junk food. Of course sugar should be taxed to pay for all the burgeoning diabetes and obesity numbers.
Child centered education is another factor. Children should learn to be thankful for any food given to them not demand and be provided with options.
In earlier decades there was a well meaning drive to build up the carbohydrate content of food grown, for starving populations but this needs reviewing as well.
This is a complex topic and the writer of the article doesn't seem to have covered many aspects.
Gaynor great point about the addictive spike crash energy, nutrient poor junk food.
I think it’s even worse than you suspect. Recent studies have shown our microbiome have greater effect on us than previously thought.
So, what we eat forms the intestinal environment that house our microbiome. If we just eat macdonalds bacteria life that thrives in whatever Maccas is made of populate to the exclusion of all other bacteria’s. I think then the maccas loving bacteria influence our actual food choices to provide more environment/population of themselves.
Our appetite urges may not be our own desires at all.
Bacteria driving our “gut brain”
Very important point about the microbiome which is more recent research.This should be given as much media attention as those with food insecurity / obesity . . They both probably coexist in the same people. .
Go to a Pak n Save or Countdown 8am and see what foods fat school kids are buying....
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.