“Following the completion of the review commissioned by the Board in March, we are pleased to announce modernised capital rules that will support an efficient and resilient financial system,” said Rodger Finlay, Chair of the RBNZ Board.
“We recalibrated our risk appetite to have regard to our new Financial Policy Remit, and to reflect important developments since 2019, including the introduction of the Depositor Compensation Scheme, and more intensive supervision, enforcement, and resolution approaches. This led us to ease common equity requirements across the system by around $5 billion compared to current levels, while still remaining confident in our system resilience.”
The package announced today includes reduced requirements for common equity, more granular risk weights, simplification of capital instruments, and greater alignment of instruments for the ‘big four’ banks with Australian settings. The final package further refines risk weights consulted on in August.
The previous requirements were somewhere between overly conservative and punitive. They were greater than other jurisdictions. The tension is:
Capital requirements are a foundational part of our prudential framework. Our rules specify the minimum percentage of a deposit taker’s funding that must come from its owners. Capital requirements that are too low risk deposit takers being unable to absorb unexpected losses when they arise and therefore failing – which may impose a direct fiscal cost on New Zealand taxpayers, as well as reducing the long-run prosperity and well-being of New Zealanders. Conversely, capital requirements that are too high can reduce credit availability and increase costs unnecessarily.
So this will allow more lending, at a lower cost.
David Farrar runs Curia Market Research, a specialist opinion polling and research agency, and the popular Kiwiblog where this article was sourced. He previously worked in the Parliament for eight years, serving two National Party Prime Ministers and three Opposition Leaders
1 comment:
Fake "news". All three international reviewers of the RBNZ capital rules recommended they stay in place. Sir John Vickers from the UK was strident in his comments. The true story is that Finance Minister Willis hired Governor Breman because she wanted a weak lackey who would not stand up to her. The Big Banks wanted those capital requirements loosened. They lobbied Willis. Diary records prove they met with Willis in her office for this purpose. They got their way.
A week after the capital rules were relaxed Sir John Vickers was proved right. Kiwibank said it would fund lending through taking on more debt, and cancelled its previously proposed equity raising. Should that bank, or others bankrupt, taxpayers will now bear the cost, not the banks' own investors. Privatizing gains and nationalizing losses has been the consequence of this National - RBNZ policy change. The Nats have become corrupted & the RBNZ lost its independence. The meagre gains in GDP are now going to Big Business, not middle NZ.
Farrar at Kiwiblog gets his polling income from the National Party so his economic blogs are biased clap trap written in the name of our monopoly pricing businesses.
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.