A guest post on NOMINISTER by William Chambers.
The ironic claim by Te Pati Maori of genetic superiority in those of Māori lineage showed through when, in an interview on the National Radio Programme, a part-Maori woman was asked whether she would be happy for her children to marry Pakeha. This self-opinionated woman replied that it would certainly not be acceptable, because Maori bloodlines need to be kept pure!
Can you imagine if, in the same context, a Pakeha had said that on radio. All hell would have broken loose.
The question that should be asked regarding the racist claim of genetic superiority is: “In what way”. The fact being, IF Maori were superior in the way of intelligence and business acumen, then they wouldn’t need hand-outs or hand-ups.
Of course, Maori will explain away their failings by playing the blame card, i.e. there aren’t opportunities for them to succeed, because due to colonisation, they are a dispossessed and oppressed race.
And on top of that, face ‘discrimination’.
But hang on, how come other races of people such as Asians, Indians, Filipinos, and black Africans etc. who come to this country with nothing, manage to do very well for themselves.
The truth is, they succeed (achieve “EQUITABLE” outcomes) through work ethic and self-discipline. Without being granted preferential “rights”. Nor exploiting Welfare and/or resorting to crime.
And because they are not blighted with an “attitude” problem, it doesn’t enter their heads that they’re discriminated against. They’re too busy leading decent lives and setting high standards for themselves and their children to exhibit a ‘grievance’ mentality anyway.
Therefore, we should not be blamed (or feel guilty) about any Maori failure … which can be due to lack of personal responsibility.
The fact is, offering help based exclusively on race is apartheid, i.e. unlawful. And, is totally unjustified because what the Treaty guaranteed is equality of citizenship.
Which ironically means it is non-Maori who should feel aggrieved, due to being unfairly burdened with the cost of supporting people who, in many instances, expect it … in the sense of taking the easy way.
Besides which, the more support you offer one category of people, the more reliant they become to being carried through life. That’s not good for any society.
TALKING ABOUT SUPERIORITY … if Maori were superior regarding CAPABILITY, then why would so many rely on Welfare?
Well, laziness isn’t a modern phenomenon, because as stated in Ian Wishart’s book ‘THE GREAT DIVIDE’ a Chief known as Ihakara Tokonui was brutally honest about this trait evident in Maori, when he admitted, quote: “You know what the bee is. Some bees work, some bees are lazy. The Pakeha are like the working bee. But the Maori is like the other bee … the lazy one. And Maori take advantage of the Pakeha’s work.”
THEN, if Maori were superior as regards being HONEST, why would they make up around 51% of the prison population, even though they’re only 18% of the total population.
The irony is that some Maori (and woke “snowflakes”) blame this also on the perceived effect of colonisation.
So, they’re saying that when Europeans first arrived, Maori were honest people. Well, recorded history tells otherwise. For example, in ‘LETTERS FROM THE BAY OF ISLANDS: The Story of Marianne Williams’ by Caroline Fitzgerald, there is a quote: “When some chiefs were challenged about their dishonourable behaviour they admitted it was true, and agreed they were bad people.”
ANOTHER matter is “CHARACTER” or lack of it. If Maori were superior in this department, then why would so many Maori toddlers be abused and murdered, by their so-called caregivers.
Past history also tells very badly on them regarding character. I’ll give another quote from the ‘LETTERS FROM THE BAY OF ISLANDS’ … “A chief called Rangi admitted that Maori generally just think to themselves … I will eat, I will fight, I will distress some poor people, and take their children for slaves.” I will also quote an excerpt from Charles Darwin’s ‘JOURNAL OF A VOYAGE AROUND THE WORLD, 1831 – 1836.’ After leaving Tahiti, the HMS Beagle visited New Zealand, and Darwin’s description of Maori is thus: “Looking at Maoris, one naturally compares them with the Tahitians … both belonging to the same family of mankind. The comparison, however, tells heavily against the Maoris. In every respect, their CHARACTER is of a lower order.” While being brutally honest about the subject of “character” I’ll quote a visiting British envoy who was sent to New South Wales in 1835. His words were: “The Maori chiefs, as well as the Tribes to which they belong, have one and the same distinguishing features, of which rapacious, thieving, and greedy disposition is a principal one”.
NOTE: the word “rapacious” is defined in the Oxford dictionary as: “Wanting more than you have a right to”.
Of course, Maori will explain away their failings by playing the blame card, i.e. there aren’t opportunities for them to succeed, because due to colonisation, they are a dispossessed and oppressed race.
And on top of that, face ‘discrimination’.
But hang on, how come other races of people such as Asians, Indians, Filipinos, and black Africans etc. who come to this country with nothing, manage to do very well for themselves.
The truth is, they succeed (achieve “EQUITABLE” outcomes) through work ethic and self-discipline. Without being granted preferential “rights”. Nor exploiting Welfare and/or resorting to crime.
And because they are not blighted with an “attitude” problem, it doesn’t enter their heads that they’re discriminated against. They’re too busy leading decent lives and setting high standards for themselves and their children to exhibit a ‘grievance’ mentality anyway.
Therefore, we should not be blamed (or feel guilty) about any Maori failure … which can be due to lack of personal responsibility.
The fact is, offering help based exclusively on race is apartheid, i.e. unlawful. And, is totally unjustified because what the Treaty guaranteed is equality of citizenship.
Which ironically means it is non-Maori who should feel aggrieved, due to being unfairly burdened with the cost of supporting people who, in many instances, expect it … in the sense of taking the easy way.
Besides which, the more support you offer one category of people, the more reliant they become to being carried through life. That’s not good for any society.
TALKING ABOUT SUPERIORITY … if Maori were superior regarding CAPABILITY, then why would so many rely on Welfare?
Well, laziness isn’t a modern phenomenon, because as stated in Ian Wishart’s book ‘THE GREAT DIVIDE’ a Chief known as Ihakara Tokonui was brutally honest about this trait evident in Maori, when he admitted, quote: “You know what the bee is. Some bees work, some bees are lazy. The Pakeha are like the working bee. But the Maori is like the other bee … the lazy one. And Maori take advantage of the Pakeha’s work.”
THEN, if Maori were superior as regards being HONEST, why would they make up around 51% of the prison population, even though they’re only 18% of the total population.
The irony is that some Maori (and woke “snowflakes”) blame this also on the perceived effect of colonisation.
So, they’re saying that when Europeans first arrived, Maori were honest people. Well, recorded history tells otherwise. For example, in ‘LETTERS FROM THE BAY OF ISLANDS: The Story of Marianne Williams’ by Caroline Fitzgerald, there is a quote: “When some chiefs were challenged about their dishonourable behaviour they admitted it was true, and agreed they were bad people.”
ANOTHER matter is “CHARACTER” or lack of it. If Maori were superior in this department, then why would so many Maori toddlers be abused and murdered, by their so-called caregivers.
Past history also tells very badly on them regarding character. I’ll give another quote from the ‘LETTERS FROM THE BAY OF ISLANDS’ … “A chief called Rangi admitted that Maori generally just think to themselves … I will eat, I will fight, I will distress some poor people, and take their children for slaves.” I will also quote an excerpt from Charles Darwin’s ‘JOURNAL OF A VOYAGE AROUND THE WORLD, 1831 – 1836.’ After leaving Tahiti, the HMS Beagle visited New Zealand, and Darwin’s description of Maori is thus: “Looking at Maoris, one naturally compares them with the Tahitians … both belonging to the same family of mankind. The comparison, however, tells heavily against the Maoris. In every respect, their CHARACTER is of a lower order.” While being brutally honest about the subject of “character” I’ll quote a visiting British envoy who was sent to New South Wales in 1835. His words were: “The Maori chiefs, as well as the Tribes to which they belong, have one and the same distinguishing features, of which rapacious, thieving, and greedy disposition is a principal one”.
NOTE: the word “rapacious” is defined in the Oxford dictionary as: “Wanting more than you have a right to”.
So nothing has changed.
THE ONE, and only thing Maori might be able to come up with to justify any perceived superiority, is their so-called wisdom in the way of spirituality. But that claim is based on nothing but the fact that, in an evolutionary sense, they are only minutes removed from a primitive, stone age existence. So, they’re still clinging to hocus-pocus beliefs that defy logic or SCIENTIFIC scrutiny. Which signals a sign of ignorance – not superior knowledge. And any ‘special’ knowledge that Maori might imagine is unique to “indigenous” peoples, is just like the claim of them actually being indigenous … utter baloney.
CONCLUSION: the outrageous delusion of Maori superiority is not backed-up by reality. But is a totally unwarranted put-down to all other races of people. So, this claim must be called out for what it is … blatant racism.
Which is instigated by the few stirrers at the top trying to wear us down … by resorting to the tactic of using any, and every opportunity to gain the upper hand.
In other words, it‘s all about ultimate “control“.
And they‘re well on their way to achieving their goal.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.