Showing posts with label Te Pūkenga. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Te Pūkenga. Show all posts
Thursday, August 1, 2024
Point of Order: Buzz from the Beehive 1/8/24
Labels: Agriculture, Antarctica NZ, Job-seekers, Point of Order, Quarterly Investment Report, Te PūkengaGovt dishes up funds for oyster festival in the north – but what about the oyster festival down south?
Another day, another trough. Attention was drawn to this one by Matt Doocey, the same fellow who yesterday was calling for applications for the Government’s first round (good for $5 million) of the new $10 million Mental Health and Addiction Community Sector Innovation Fund.
Wednesday, April 3, 2024
David Farrar: The operating model should precede the decision
Labels: David Farrar, No operating model, Te PūkengaThe Herald reports:
The chief executive of the sprawling, partially amalgamated polytechnic and training institute Te Pūkenga (the New Zealand Institute of Skills and Technology) left the organisation in January with a golden handshake.
Friday, December 8, 2023
Point of Order: Buzz from the Beehive - 8/12/23
Labels: App tax, COP28, Human Rights Commission, Malicious cyber activity, Point of Order, South Pacific Defence Ministers’ Meeting, Te PūkengaWillis fails a taxing app-titude test but govt supporters will cheer moves on Te Pukenga and the Human Rights Commission
The Minister of Defence has returned from Noumea to announce New Zealand will host next year’s South Pacific Defence Ministers’ Meeting and (wearing another ministerial hat) to condemn malicious cyber activity conducted by the Russian Government.
A bigger cheer from people who voted for the Luxon government is likely to be generated by news that the process of disestablishing Te Pūkenga is under way.
Monday, April 10, 2023
Brian Easton: The Fashion For Generic Management Is Not Working.
Labels: Archives New Zealand, Brian Easton, Creative New Zealand, Generic management, Health New Zealand, Healthcare, Te PūkengaThe public service is suffering from the downgrading of the role of professionals, experts and those at the workface with the public.
There is a management fashion that believes that by imposing layers of generic managers, public spending will become more efficient because they will control the professionals, who cannot be trusted. It is true that professionals often have objectives which are dismissive of fiscal considerations – objectives like the welfare of those they are working for – and that some cannot be trusted not to act in their commercial interests. But there is surprisingly little evidence that the layers of generic management have worked well – most managers are not very good at evaluating themselves – and there are numerous anecdotes of them adding to costs with bullshit jobs or those which actually reduce the effectiveness of the professionals on the front line.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



