I promised you there'd be more to come, and today we're turning our attention to another of the great research quangos that our research team has been looking into: the Marsden Fund, which is managed by the Royal Society of New Zealand.
The Royal Society boasts a long and proud tradition of excellence, tracing its origins to the esteemed English counterpart established in 1660, with the New Zealand branch being founded back in 1867.
By way of example, the New Zealand physicist who split the atom, Lord Rutherford, was one of the original 20 Royal Society Fellows appointed in 1919 and is just one example of the organisation recognising scientific brilliance.
The Marsden Fund is reserved for top-tier research funding. The Fund (according to the Society's website) "Supports excellence in science, engineering, maths, social sciences and the humanities in New Zealand by providing grants for investigator-initiated research".
The Marsden Fund is supposed to support the crème de la crème of New Zealand academia, showcasing the highest standards of scholarly excellence and innovation. Managed (apparently) with the utmost integrity and a steadfast commitment to advancing knowledge, the Marsden Fund stands as a beacon of academic prestige and intellectual rigour.
Although a private not-for-profit body, the vast majority of funding for the Royal Society comes from you, and other humble taxpayers. The Marsden Fund money is all from the Government taxpayers.
Last year, the taxpayer funding amounted to $83.5 million – almost exactly what's needed to fund the 13 cancer drugs that we, apparently, "can't afford" ***(although that could be about to change, if media speculation that an announcement is coming this afternoon is correct)***.
Here is some of the "research" the Royal Society has "invested" your tax dollars in:
First up, let's look at how the guardians of the Marsden Fund are tackling the scourge of crime – crime podcasts that is...
So-called 'sofa sleuths' will love this research grant – as will one lucky academic, who will be paid to listen, and write about, crime podcasts from around the world!
By way of example, the New Zealand physicist who split the atom, Lord Rutherford, was one of the original 20 Royal Society Fellows appointed in 1919 and is just one example of the organisation recognising scientific brilliance.
The Marsden Fund is reserved for top-tier research funding. The Fund (according to the Society's website) "Supports excellence in science, engineering, maths, social sciences and the humanities in New Zealand by providing grants for investigator-initiated research".
The Marsden Fund is supposed to support the crème de la crème of New Zealand academia, showcasing the highest standards of scholarly excellence and innovation. Managed (apparently) with the utmost integrity and a steadfast commitment to advancing knowledge, the Marsden Fund stands as a beacon of academic prestige and intellectual rigour.
Although a private not-for-profit body, the vast majority of funding for the Royal Society comes from you, and other humble taxpayers. The Marsden Fund money is all from the Government taxpayers.
Last year, the taxpayer funding amounted to $83.5 million – almost exactly what's needed to fund the 13 cancer drugs that we, apparently, "can't afford" ***(although that could be about to change, if media speculation that an announcement is coming this afternoon is correct)***.
Here is some of the "research" the Royal Society has "invested" your tax dollars in:
First up, let's look at how the guardians of the Marsden Fund are tackling the scourge of crime – crime podcasts that is...
So-called 'sofa sleuths' will love this research grant – as will one lucky academic, who will be paid to listen, and write about, crime podcasts from around the world!
Grant ID: 23-MAU-004
Recipient: Dr CS Bjork, Massey University
Sound Judgments? Assessing the Rhetorics of Civic Deliberation in True Crime Podcasting
With nearly one billion downloads globally, the skyrocketing popularity of true crime podcasting has sparked intense debate among scholars. Some decry the genre’s perpetuation of racist stereotypes and misogynistic narratives, while others celebrate its potential to advocate for social justice. But true crime podcasting also illuminates important recent developments in the longstanding relationship between rhetoric and civic discourse in democratic societies. Through the lens of rhetoric, Sound Judgments? will explore how true crime podcasting provides significant insights into the perplexing yet fundamental civic process of making collective judgments in a digital age.
Approved funding: $360,000
Education is a big focus:
Grant ID: 23-UOA-164
Recipient: Dr A Pasley, University of Auckland
Co-designing and Decolonising Gender Education: Exploring What It Means for Gender Diverse Students to Thrive in Schools
"Collaborating with gender diverse students, this research operationalises whole-school approaches to gender diversity-affirming education... Fundamentally, this research acknowledges the colonial inheritance of gender norms, providing gender diverse young people with a platform to decolonise conventional approaches to sexuality education and how gendered expectations permeate education"
Approved funding: $360,000
You read that right. Gender norms (i.e. "boys" and "girls") being, in fact, just an inheritance of colonisation is, we understand, a very widely held view by those in charge of New Zealand's premier scientific fund.
Or what about housing? That's an important issue facing New Zealand right now. Especially the "experience of homes"...
Grant ID: 23-UOO-037
Recipient: Dr ES Chisholm, Otago University
Making a home in employer-provided housing Across the world, people in a broad range of professions live in housing provided by their employers. Yet little is known about life in employer-provided housing. This project will draw on theories of power to investigate how a single relationship that secures both housing and employment affects experience of homes, and analyse differences over time and between different sectors of working.
Approved funding: $360,000
360 grand to interview people on "their life" and "experience" in an employer-owned home! Crème de la crème research, indeed.
Now for this one, the only explanation is that someone has selected the random words "sexuality", "food", "identity", and "socialisation" and, somehow, by putting it in a word blender (AI perhaps?) submitted it for a grant.
And for the effort, they won a 360 grand grant! Creative, yes! Worthy? Scientific? Enlightening? You be the judge.
Grant ID: 23-MAU-082
Recipient: Dr HL Black, Massey University
Kua kī taku puku, ko te waha o raro kei te hiakai tonu: The de-sexualisation of te reo Māori domains
"...founded on tikanga Māori and kaupapa Māori, this research will identify how sexuality was traditionally expressed and defined by examining... harihari kai (happy eating), pao (singing), haka, pūrākau (legendary, mythical stories), ngeri (chanting) and idiomatic expressions... contribut[ing] to a body of mātauranga on te reo Māori and sexuality by investigating how sexuality, food, identity, and socialisation are all part of a complex and interwoven Māori cultural worldview."
Approved funding: $360,000
Here's another one also involving food, which is pretty critical for New Zealand's economy, right?
Grant ID: 23-VUW-122
Recipient: Associate Professor JT Smith, Victoria University of Wellington
Seeding Hope: The Diverse Roles of Indigenous Women in Food Systems
"Women are the key seed savers, knowledge keepers and advocates in Indigenous food systems which acknowledge the sovereign capacities of nature, treat food as medicine, as a teacher and a relative. Yet there is little research that investigates the work Indigenous women do within these food systems. We develop a mana wahine analysis that draws on kōrero from Indigenous food growers and advocates across five diverse Indigenous food systems (Aotearoa, Hawaii, India, Peru and Turtle Island). Our global approach offers a new Indigenous-to-Indigenous framework to more deeply understand Indigenous women’s roles, values and practices regarding food, seed and soil sovereignty."
Approved funding: $861,000
Before you say $861,000 is too much, remember that this research will necessarily involve having to (God forbid) travel (business class, of course) to India, Hawaii, Peru, and Turtle Island (Fiji) to speak to indigenous woman and try their food.
Let's turn to a more respectable subject. Like legal research:
Grant ID: 23-UOO-218
Recipient: Professor BJ Schonthal, Otago University
Mapping Buddhist Law in Asia
"Despite decades of scholarship documenting the influences of Christian law on Western legal culture, scholars have ignored... Buddhist law on legal cultures in Asia. This project... produc[es] the first comprehensive account of Buddhist law as a complex transhistorical, transregional legal tradition... [and] will yield crucial new knowledge about a tradition of law that has shaped human societies..."
Approved funding: $660,000
Who knew Buddha had in mind New Zealand's taxpayers when he said "Give, even if you only have a little."
Okay, more serious now. Let's turn to kids' books – surely they can't screw that up, right? Right?!
Okay, more serious now. Let's turn to kids' books – surely they can't screw that up, right? Right?!
Grant ID: 23-UOW-011
Recipient: Associate Professor N Daly, University of Waikato
Picture Books in Aotearoa: The design and content of picture books reflecting indigenous language, culture and evolving national identities
"Picturebooks are a powerful form of children’s literature... Our project... explor[es] best practice for authentic respectful representations of Indigenous languages and identities throughout the publishing process. Our interdisciplinary team will... undertak[e] a Kaupapa Māori driven investigation, to document and explore the ways in which Indigenous voices are and can be authentically represented in picturebooks."
Approved funding: $660,000
So indigenous language but in picture books? The poor Associate Professor got $660,000 to discover that there are not a lot of words or language in picture books (that's kind of the point, eh?)
We looked up the Associate Professor, and according to her bio:
I am a sociolinguist interested in the language hierarchies present in children's literature. I am also interested in the pedagogical potential of picturebooks for social justice in educational contexts from early childhood settings through to tertiary contexts. I teach courses in children's literature and supervise Masters and PhD students in children's literature and language-related topics.
You'd think if anyone knew picture books lack language, it would be the good Associate Professor.
And, just like the Health Research Council, you can't do science anymore without religion... (and any views to the contrary are hate-speech).
Grant ID: 23-VUW-025
Recipient: Dr AZ Arkilic, Victoria University of Wellington
Embracing Islam: Conversion, Identity, and Belonging in Aotearoa New Zealand
Conversion to Islam in Aotearoa remains under-researched… Co-designed by a born Muslim and a Māori Muslim convert... The study will challenge prevailing political interpretations of Islamic conversion that emphasise radicalisation. Ultimately, by improving our understanding... and exploring the role of religion in a decolonising, post-Christian Aotearoa, it will offer novel insights into national identity, demographics, and citizenship.
Approved funding: $360,000
How did this rot set in? You can thank our old friend, Grant Robertson
The problem with the Marsden Fund can be traced back to a bill introduced in 2010 when a (then) little known Labour MP, Grant Robertson, put up the rather innocuous-sounding Royal Society of New Zealand Amendment Bill.
Eventually unanimously passed in 2012, the main thing it did was to change the Object of the Royal Society from "the advancement and promotion of science and technology..." to "the advancement and promotion in New Zealand of science, technology, and the humanities."
It defined "humanities" to include "languages, history, religion, philosophy, law, classics, linguistics, literature, cultural studies, media studies, art history, film, and drama”.
That change has given tofu-munching, climate-striking, purple-haired academics carte blanche to get funding for all manner of 'research' projects that simply don't bring any return on investment to the taxpayers who pay for them.
The National Party can't escape blame for this. Despite MPs expressing doubts about the Robertson-sponsored law-change, the then John Key Government backed the widening of the scope which has seen science money diverted more and more into ridiculous humanities projects like those listed above.
With the new Government, we can get them to see sense and repeal the changes.
National, ACT, and NZ First promised to get a handle on wasteful spending. Here's an excellent opportunity for them walk the talk!
With the new Government, we can get them to see sense and repeal the changes.
National, ACT, and NZ First promised to get a handle on wasteful spending. Here's an excellent opportunity for them walk the talk!
Jordan Williams is a constitutional and commercial lawyer who is Executive Director & Co-founder of the Taxpayers' Union. This article was sourced HERE
5 comments:
Perhaps someone should be given $360,000 to study how these word soup descriptions originated and to translate them so that those with English only to Churchillian standards might understand. If for School Cert comprehension I had benn asked to explain same, I would have failed for sure. Ditto Churchill. Does anyone vet the end product? What if it judged poor (or nil) value?
Absolutely gobsmacked. Makes us want to sell up, give up, jump on a cruiseship and when the mood allows, jump off the back. This rubbish must be reset to the original intent, wake up coalition - please! Can this be done tomorrow? All the pontificating about getting NZ back on track is completely nullified by this kind of absolute stupidity. It is like flushing our hard earned cash down the plug hole.
If anyone thinks voting National will end this massive waste of tax-payer’s money ‘they’ will be deeply disappointed. The two big parties are just 2 sides of the same coin. And don’t think that voting in the next Bread and Circuses event (ie election) will make any difference. If it threatened to do so voting would be forbidden. Some American wit once opined that Congress would be dramatically more effective if the first 800 names in the NY phone book were deemed Congressmen. Maybe the same principle applies here for, say, Invercargill?
Good call here, Jordan. I’ve believed that the Masden Fund has been giving very little benefit to the New Zealand taxpayer in return for the gross amounts of money it has distributed. My involvement with the fund was brief and peripheral, as an applicant, an unsuccessful one, but nevertheless, realised that a non-academic has virtually no chance of success, though I had assistance from one in my application. My application, about 10 years ago, involved forestry in the dynamic New Zealand landscape; past, present and future.
At the time there was successful application along similar lines resulting in a book “Seeds of Empire, The Environmental Transformation of New Zealand”
It is a relatively small (A5) book, with few illustrations in black and white. It has an outrageous price tag of $174.95. Few public libraries hold it (I’ve checked). It was written by 8 authors. (2 chapters had 3 authors!) They would have knocked it up in a couple of weeks. For that the Fund gave them $603,000. A year after publication I asked the Fund how many books were (a) printed and (b) sold. The answer was “We don’t do that kind of follow up”.
That’s the only example that I am familiar with, but suspect that it is no exception.
I hope that Seymour and Peter's have this one in their hit list as well.
Post a Comment