Thursday, January 23, 2025
Anglo Saxon: Debunking Tureiti Haromi Moxon's - ethno communist agenda
Labels: Anglo Saxon, Communist agenda, Regulatory Standards Bill, Tureti MoxonIn a recent Herald article, Tureiti Moxon scolded the Regulatory Standards Bill. She argued that the bill was racist against Maori people... but is it; or is it more the case that Moxon is projecting her own racist views onto the Crown; carrying out its duty to govern New Zealand?
Click to view
8 comments:
We just completed a compliance module at work that was constantly stating that everyone must be treated equally regardless of age, gender, disability or ethnicity. It was brilliant. The module was British and came from Australia as we are owned by an aussie company. I thought to myself, if only our nz government woukd give all of our politicians a mandatory module like this to complete. Ms moxon needs this course 100%.
Reasoned, sensible logic.
Moxon is projecting her own racist views onto the Crown; carrying out its duty to govern New Zealand?
Communism for New Zealand and throughout the West is the Corporate City Agenda.
A superb dismantle of another racially charged "colonisation is evil" rant. There needs to be more public pushback of this nonsense. And where is our fourth estate? Either sleeping, or actively supporting this rubbish.
Absolutely agree with everything Anglo Saxon states except that our education system in NZ must have no blame attached to it concerning Maori poor achievement .They make up a disproportionate one third of the low socio-economic sector.
We have in NZ , a destructive progressive -Marxist education system based on the theories mainly of an aggressive atheist , John Dewey. He was hellbent on destroying traditional education which for us in NZ produced education equality and quality that was the envy of the world.
Instead we now have the longest tail of underachievement in the
developed world . This impacts low SES children who are unfortunately damaged most by the permissive discipline , ineffective teaching methods , and lack of work ethic in schools.
As I have stated multiple times before higher SES children can acquire outside tutoring or other home help from their better- off homes which is not available to poorer children .This can make up for the deficiencies in the schools.
A quality school system such as we used to have mostly up to mid last century had all children in a class achieving at the correct level for their age at primary school . You were not discriminated against by a poor background as existed frequenbtly during the Depression when my mother practised Universal Literacy in her low SES classes in public schools in Otago.
I am not suggesting our schools are the only offenders. I am aware of other contributing factors like solo mothers which Turiana Turia encouraged to boost the Maori underclass.
Western evils have also contributed like licentiosness of libertarianism and the abandonment of other western traditional values as well as Marxism.
Thank you for your article.
Despite her rabid and seditious view Moxon regulary rants on RNZ, encouraged by and never questioned by the pro maori presenters. No similarly extreme (or balanced and reasonable) counter voice is ever heard.. Whether an Insurgency Coordination Committee contacts RNZ or RNZ contacts her for a tirade I do not know. With so much of the RNZ staff blatantly pro maori it makes little difference. Her husband, despite Vercoe influence, and from whom she acquires the Lady affectation, must squirm at her non Christian antagonistic attitude.
Good talk, thanks. One small matter: Some of us do claim that male numbers in prison compared with females are in part the result of sexism by the system. Good research both in NZ and elsewhere has clearly shown that men are treated worse than women at every stage of law enforcement and justice process. Also, we have many laws that are discriminatory against men but none against women; e.g. infanticide is only for women who murder children with a maximum punishment of three years imprisonment though any punishment at all is rare. Men are more likely to be charged for an offence, less likely to be referred for psychiatric assessment that might be used to excuse the offending, more likely to be imprisoned on remand, less likely to get name suppression, more likely to be convicted on the same quality of evidence, and are almost always sentenced more harshly than women are for the same offence.
In contrast, the research claimed to show racial discrimination in justice against Maori is poor. For example, that research looked at sentences for particular crimes and found that Maori received harsher sentences on average for the same crimes (e.g. more likely to get prison time), but it ignored (for example) the previous offending history. Of course, anyone convicted of an offence when they have committed similar offences before will receive a harsher sentence this time. The male vs female research controlled for such factors and still found considerable bias against men. That's not to deny that men offend violently a lot more and more seriously than do women on average. (Women commit fraud, theft from employer and similar offences more than men do on average. Also, a lot of bad behaviour by women has been legitimised or is ignored; e.g. marrying to get half or more of a man's property; tricking a man or stealing his sperm in order to become pregnant then requiring that man to pay handsomely for at least 18 years; damaging a foetus through alcohol, drugs etc; abortion; false allegations.)
Post a Comment