Pages

Tuesday, August 12, 2025

Richard Eldred: Social Media Giants Face Fines for Curbing Free Speech


Ministers have warned social media giants that they face huge fines if “overzealous” enforcement of the Online Safety Act ends up silencing lawful free speech. The Telegraph has the story.

Ministers have told platforms including Facebook, X, Instagram and TikTok they must not restrict access to posts that express lawfully held views.

The warning, in an apparent change of tone from ministers, comes amid a backlash over websites blocking users from viewing material, including parliamentary debates about grooming gangs.

Campaigners have said that free speech is threatened by the Government’s application of the Online Safety Act, which is meant to protect children from harmful content.

J.D. Vance, the US Vice President, used a visit to the UK this week to warn ministers against going down the “dark path” of censorship.

Whitehall sources have expressed concern that social media firms, some of which have criticised the law, “have been overzealous” in enforcing it and must be “mindful” of the right to freedom of expression.

The Science Department, which oversees the legislation, told companies they could face fines if they failed to uphold free speech rules. …

Mr Vance directly challenged the Government on its attitude towards freedom of expression on Friday when he visited David Lammy at Chevening house.

Ahead of a meeting with the Foreign Secretary, Mr Vance said the West had become “too comfortable with censoring” rather than engaging with other opinions.

His comments are the latest sign that Donald Trump’s administration is increasingly concerned about freedom of speech in the UK.

Lord Young of Acton, the founder of the Free Speech Union, said Labour’s threat to fine social media firms should be seen in the light of US pressure.

He said: “This feels performative to me. An attempt to reassure J.D. Vance that the British Government takes free speech seriously.

“In reality, the free speech duties under the Act are a joke and the chances of Ofcom fining a social media firm for failing to comply with them are vanishing to zero.”

Lord Young said that the legislation included powers to compel certain platforms not to remove content that was journalistic or of democratic importance.

He urged Peter Kyle, the Science Secretary, to “get on” with triggering them by deciding which service providers should be put into the top risk category.

Worth reading in full.

Richard Eldred is an Associate Editor of the Daily Sceptic. He spent close to two decades working in broadcast journalism in Hong Kong before returning to the U.K. in 2022. This article was first published HERE

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Within the United Kingdom, for many years there has been a specially designated Police Unit, it is stated that staff numbers are large, whose sole role it to monitor any & all Social Media venues, including YouTube. Their collective task is to see if " a person has created a message (that can be shared, copied and re-routed re-transmitted) that can be deemed Offensive (in any manner) which is in contravention of Hate Speech Laws.
A recent example is a (white) female who placed a message on her social media blog, following a widely noted event involving a 'specific ethnicity' - then removed said comment, apologized, only to be arrested & charged - and placed in prison.
There have been citizens, within the UK who have used YouTube to post videos of specific events, that -
- YouTube have either censored or removed
- have been 'warned' (by Authorities) to cease & desist
- with the increase of arrests (& threats) have refrained from any further videos.
It has got to the point that one ' has to be careful', in a public space, of what conversations are had and what the topics of same are about.

Anonymous said...

As an addition to above comment, there was an interesting video on YouTube, of recent hours, filmed with a cell phone, of a British Police Officer, his ethnicity suggested Pakistani who approached a white male, Christian, preaching The Word of God in a Public space and informed him, that a "person had approached said Police Officer and complained that the words being spoken were offensive to them".
The Police Officer, explained to the male, that -
- he " had been advised of such' and he was asking the man to 'cease'.
The man refused, so the Police officer than advised -
- "He would be arrested under Hate Speech laws and charged accordingly".
This is not the first time such videos have appeared on YouTube and they show the extent that British Police go to impinge on freedom of movement and speech.
It is interesting, as there is also videos of those of the Islamic Faith preaching in public spaces, with Police standing by to ensure "their safety, but no one is allowed to complain".