And for what!
For too long the world has been held to ransom by the IPCC activist scientists and woke political leaders in that “bastion of freedom” - the United Nations. Their mantra has proven to be a false commentary on the reasons behind global warming and it is therefore no surprise that supporters within governments who accepted the narrative blaming it all on human induced green house emissions are being forced to ditch policies they previously considered the saviour of mankind.
And the reasons for this mass exodus of believers is simply because, even if there is still a shred of evidence in support of the case for a changeover to clean energy, the current method of implementation is proving economically unsustainable - which in political terms within democracies means it is a no longer the winner it once was.
Here are the facts behind that statement.
While the nations responsible for most of the world’s green house gas emissions build coal fired power stations at breakneck speed, we here in Australasia continue to struggle from self imposed restrictions that threaten our own quality of life.
And meanwhile, the ridiculous fact that emerges from our years of senseless indoctrination is that all the green house gases combined down here in the South Pacific amount to less than 1% of total world carbon emissions. So, it will make almost no difference if we alone achieve the Paris agreement targets that are supposedly designed to save the human race from self inflicted extinction.
It is a sick joke and we are the dummies who have fallen for this false prophecy at the expense of our own economic survival.
How can I be sure that the “greenhouse gas” scientific argument is flawed to the extent that we should reject it before it destroys us all?
My answer is that I can’t be sure but using my own logic based on counter arguments as to the cause of Climate Change, l do believe enough evidence has emerged to suggest we have been sold a pup.
My own theory (scientifically based) is that the current bout of Climate Change is just part of a cyclical pattern that depends almost entirely on the distance between Planet Earth and the Sun’s solar flares. We have been here before and our current position is the cause of our global warming. It follows that as the Sun recedes, the Earth will cool, and the glaciers will return. And In the meantime, the current warming cycle is survivable!
However, it is incumbent on our politicians who have ultimate responsibility for our wellbeing to be like me and trust their own logic as to what is best for those of us who are and have been affected most by adherence to this nonsense.
It is madness to even think that this hoax has a shred of credibility left - if it ever did.
If I had my way, I would have cancelled the whole project years ago and let those who have the ability to do so - save us from ourselves.
Surely, not too much to ask but politicians, being what they are and too scared to admit they were wrong, will continue tinkering around the edges in a costly exercise in stupidly.
Not good enough.
Clive Bibby is a commentator, consultant, farmer and community leader, who lives in Tolaga Bay.
7 comments:
In the 1970’s, if my memory serves me right, Bob Harvey declared downtown Auckland would be a metre underwater within something like 30 years. Where is he now? We have been fed so many lies over the years and wasted precious dollars for phenomenons that humans cannot control, anymore than the spread of the likes of caulerpa seaweed carried on sea currents. Infestations come and go depending on a whole range of factors. However well intentioned the proponents who believe otherwise are likely to be proved wrong once again.
Perhaps consideration should be given to our per capita contribution of greenhouse gases . If most of the rest claimed they produce less than NZ, so no worry, where would we be? Is it really necessary for every small time builder to run a Ford Ranger, typically scrapped after 15 years? Despite the efforts of maori. NZ will be attractive to climate refugees who will not sustain our luxury lifestyle.
Exactly right Clive. The current moronic belief in anthropogenic climate perturbations is akin to those who once thought our planet was the centre of the solar system and that heliocentrism was the devil's work.
Well said Clive. You have sensibly laid down the challenge, but unfortunately we don’t have a Trump in the Beehive but a crew that places globalist nonsense ahead of our country’s best interests.
Minor correction Clive - you did not suffer two climate events, you suffered two weather events. Climate does not have 'events' per se. For Robert Arthur - the contribution of certain gases to making Earth achieve liable surface temperatures is in no way the same mechanism as how greenhouses work, and is substantially overblown as to the extent of that contribution. Even then human input to that equation is minuscule, and New Zealand's next to nothing.
Well said Clive about common sense , It is refereshing that coal is being stockpiled at Huntley and the world hasn't collapsed. I do not agree that it is imported coal but it will keep the lights on when required .
1) The availability of coal in NZ is legendary.
2) A consent application for a new thermal powerstation in the North island as close as possible to the main population should be instigated immediately.
3) The coal mining and powerstation construction would be positive input that NZ requires .
4) The alarmists have had their say , practicality is now required .
5) The consent conditions can have the same strict clean air requirements as they do in large cities overseas which are not exceeded.
It can be summed up by the fact that our so called political leaders are a bunch of sanctimonious, self-righteous, dogmatic and arrogant twats!
Post a Comment