Maduro rigged the last election and was an illegitimate President. His departure will be welcomed by many Venezuelans. There is already huge celebrations. He was guided by Cuban security guards as he couldn’t even trust his own people not to turn on him.
While Maduro was a bad man, does that mean the US was justified in using military force to seize him? There are many countries with bad leaders. The answer is somewhere between a possible yes and a probable no. He was under indictment from US courts on drug charges, and there was a precedent based on the invasion of Panama to seize Manuel Noriega. However Panama actually had declared war on the US, and a US marine was shot at a road block. This gave George H W Bush greater justification. Also there was broad political consensus in the US for military action. I doubt the actions in Venezuela are legal under international law, but it is no surprise Trump would not be concerned with opinions on this.
It is also worth noting that Trump sent troops in to arrest Maduro on drug smuggling charges, but a few weeks ago he pardoned Juan Orlando Hernández, the former president of Honduras, from his 45 year sentence for drug smuggling.
I thought that the removal of Maduro would see María Corina Machado Parisca become President – the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize Winner and opposition leader. But Trump rather dismissively said she is a “nice woman” but not got enough support to be President of Venezuela. Maybe he is annoyed at her for winning what he saw as his peace prize. So for now VP Delcy Venezuela is the President of Venezuela.
Click to view
While Maduro was a bad man, does that mean the US was justified in using military force to seize him? There are many countries with bad leaders. The answer is somewhere between a possible yes and a probable no. He was under indictment from US courts on drug charges, and there was a precedent based on the invasion of Panama to seize Manuel Noriega. However Panama actually had declared war on the US, and a US marine was shot at a road block. This gave George H W Bush greater justification. Also there was broad political consensus in the US for military action. I doubt the actions in Venezuela are legal under international law, but it is no surprise Trump would not be concerned with opinions on this.
It is also worth noting that Trump sent troops in to arrest Maduro on drug smuggling charges, but a few weeks ago he pardoned Juan Orlando Hernández, the former president of Honduras, from his 45 year sentence for drug smuggling.
I thought that the removal of Maduro would see María Corina Machado Parisca become President – the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize Winner and opposition leader. But Trump rather dismissively said she is a “nice woman” but not got enough support to be President of Venezuela. Maybe he is annoyed at her for winning what he saw as his peace prize. So for now VP Delcy Venezuela is the President of Venezuela.
Click to view
Trump has said Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth will lead a team to run Venezuela, making this tweet before that announcement even funnier. For those who don’t know Rubio is the Secretary of State, Acting National Security Advisor and Acting National Archivist of the United States.
It is very unclear what will happen next. Trump is not going to do an Iraq and remove all aspects of the previous administration from power (which was a critical mistake). In fact he seems to be doing what I thought should have been done in Iraq, which is to tell the next in line to run the country but behave well or they’ll be captured also.
He has also said US oil companies will take over the running of Venezuela oil. Now their infrastructure was run down by the previous Government, which is partly when so many are now in poverty there. But Trump is saying some of the money will go to the US to reimburse them, so for once we do have a US war that was about oil! (the left thing every US war is about oil!). I am not sure how US companies can run Venezuela oil without US troops on the ground.
It is also very unclear if there will be regional fighting for power, as nature abhors a vacuum. So while the outcome of Maduro in custody with no loss of US life is a good one, it could still turn very messy.
Click to view
This tweet seems to sum things up rather well!
David Farrar runs Curia Market Research, a specialist opinion polling and research agency, and the popular Kiwiblog where this article was sourced. He previously worked in the Parliament for eight years, serving two National Party Prime Ministers and three Opposition Leaders
3 comments:
It would appear that Trump is not about to make the same mistakes associated with the Sadam Hussein removal.
All reputable legal and political comnentators both in the US and throughout the Free World seem to agree that this operation was carried out within the limits of US law.
It remains to be seen if the announced future strategy related to a peaceful transition of democratic oversight will be treated with the sensitivity and precision of the first stage.
My guess is that the Trump administration will be careful not to waste the opportunity that has arisen to realign the international oil supply which will most likely negatively impact China's dependence on
Venezuelan oil. Access to the world's single largest oil reserves could be instrumental in the reduction of world
energy prices which, in itself could help reduce tensions at various flash points.
All in all another success for the man they love to hate.
>"... this operation was carried out within the limits of US law."
US law does not apply on the soil of another sovereign nation. That's called "extraterritorial jurisdiction" and is a no-no under international law.
Clive Bibby says “…the Trump administration will be careful not to waste the opportunity that has arisen to realign the international oil supply which will most likely negatively impact China's dependence on Venezuelan oil”. So, the U S under Trump kidnapers the leader, (yes, a deplorable dictator), of another country and imposes its control so as to manipulate the supply of oil in a way that disadvantages China, (but advances the U S), an emerging global power that is on the way to challenging America’s supremacy. Such is the leadership of the current occupant of the White House. The world is a dangerous place these days, and Trump is making it more so. And ‘all reputable legal and political commentators both in the US and throughout the Free World', it seems to me, deplore this adventure.
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.