This was not ordinary political reporting. It was a deliberate effort to manufacture and amplify a leadership crisis where none needed to exist. From 16 April 2026, when Coughlan wrote “Christopher Luxon’s limited options as he stares down toughest fortnight of his leadership,” the Herald pursued a relentless narrative of weakness and inevitable downfall. On 18 April, Coughlan published an exclusive claiming an MP had tried to warn Luxon of flagging caucus support. By 17 April, the paper was already running “What happens next in Christopher Luxon leadership saga.” Even on the day of the vote, 21 April, Coughlan’s headline asked “Christopher Luxon fires his shot – can he save his leadership?”
Between mid-March and 21 April 2026, the Herald published more than a dozen prominent stories explicitly questioning Luxon’s leadership, portraying him as embattled, out of touch, and on the brink of removal. Anonymous sources, leaked discontent, and dire predictions were deployed with clinical precision. The clear intent was to erode public and caucus confidence until the pressure became unbearable.
This is not journalism. This is an attempt by an unelected media outlet to engineer the removal of a democratically elected Prime Minister. Thomas Coughlan and the New Zealand Herald took it upon themselves to act as political king-breakers, using their platform to push a narrative that Luxon was finished and that a change of leadership was both necessary and inevitable.
Luxon’s decisive victory in the confidence vote exposed the campaign for what it was: a failed media coup. The Herald’s relentless assault did not reflect the will of the people or the National caucus — it reflected the paper’s own political preferences and hostility toward the current government.
New Zealanders have every right to be alarmed. When a major newspaper sets out to undermine and topple a sitting Prime Minister through sustained negative coverage and manufactured drama, it crosses a dangerous line. Democracy is not served by unelected journalists attempting to dictate who leads the country.
The Herald and Thomas Coughlan owe the public, and the office of Prime Minister, a full accounting for this partisan overreach. Their campaign was not reporting — it was an attempt to subvert the democratic process. Luxon’s survival is a rebuke to their agenda. The question now is whether the Herald will learn from this failure, or continue its reckless campaign against elected leadership.
Rodney Hide is a former Minister and leader of the ACT Party. This article was sourced from HERE.
19 comments:
Journalism thrives on transparency but can also go digging in the shadows. National is in disarray and the economy is also in disarray. The Herald reports the truth. The voters need to be kept informed.
Actually, caucus elects the Prime Minister, not the general voters.
At the moment, given a chance, a helluva lot of National supporters would vote for a less racist PM from the same caucus.
No, I haven't read the Herald articles - buying a copy is morally wrong these days.
However, did the Herald articulate the failure of Luxon to deliver on his election mandate regarding Maorification being the reason why he should go ?
I would be very surprised if they are that honest.
I love satirical humour that anonymous 6.51 delivers in spades with, “The Herald Reports the Truth”. Are we talking about the same Herald that gushed about Ardern as she systematically destroyed the NZ economy? The corrupt MSM never tires from trying to shape public opinion.
NZH - this is what the tawdry NZ media has come to. But - Goldsmith is the media Minister.
@6:51 Annon
If the herald reported “the truth” why has the public’s trust in the herald and greater MSM fallen to all time lows?? 🤔
Plus this is an amazing line to continue to take when we’ve just seen Luxon handily win the confidence vote …. So much for party unrest 🤦♂️
The same media who manufactured Jacindamania and propped up the previous govt. What a surprise!
And now we have the disgraceful Herald "editorial" of 22 April that confirms Hyde's assertions by belittling the caucus vote and complaining that the "disgruntled National MPs have had their chance". No apology for magnifying rumours into a full blown crisis. No comment on the flat denials from the alleged miscreants fingered by Mike Hoskins (whose own motives now have to be questioned). Just some unidentified ''editorial" writer doubling down on the Herald's appalling unprofessionalism in reporting smoke and mirrors. The coalition government has more weighty issues to grapple with than swatting off a hostile press interested only in cheap headlines.
I have no comment on the Herald’s performance or intentions in relation to the current Government of New Zealand. The issue that many scientists have with the Herald and other mainstream media is their eagerness to publish pieces that are scientifically baseless and potentially misleading; for example, several pieces on the lunar cycle as a guide to managing agriculture or your vegetable garden. The reader can search online for these articles and find them very easily.
Apart from very tiny physiological responses of a few plants or seeds in response to the sustained illuminance of a full moon by comparison with complete darkness, there is no evidence for the idea of the lunar cycle as a guide to farming whatsoever. See:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342648175_What_Has_Been_Thought_and_Taught_on_the_Lunar_Influence_on_Plants_in_Agriculture_Perspective_from_Physics_and_Biology
In addition, the Herald has published other pieces that espouse traditional or folk medicine for sick people – a potentially very dangerous message to give to desperate people who are themselves very ill or who perhaps have a sick child. In some cases traditional or folk medicine can complement clinical medicine but should not be presented as viable alternatives. At the very least, the Herald should publish the responses of experienced medical professionals.
The problem is that for the most part the mainstream New Zealand media refuse to publish the views of scientists on such matters. Such journalism is completely irresponsible and the New Zealand public deserves much better.
For a more detailed discussion, see:
https://breakingviewsnz.blogspot.com/2024/09/david-lillis-science-and-new-zealand.html
David Lillis
NZ Herald adheres to journalistic standards and faces repercussions if they breach them. Nothing of the sort happens with opinion piece factories, such as The Platform or whatever poor ol’ Duncan Garner is doing these days. This tells you all you need to know about where to send your trust…or just ignore these facts, and rant whenever you read something that doesn’t align with your worldview!
To Anonymous at 3.15 PM. The Herald has indeed published scientifically-baseless pieces, as outlined above by me. I and others have indeed attempted to publish various letters to editors and articles to the Herald and other media in order to put a scientific perspective into the public domain, but mostly we have got nowhere.
Our comments are not about ranting when we read something that does not align with our world views. For us it is all about the expectations of the tax-paying public in relation to responsible journalism, especially on matters that have to do with science and medicine.
David Lillis
Anon @ 6.26pm - What "journalistic standards" and what "repercussions"? Is there legislation and/or regulations I'm not aware of?
NZ Herald has a troll under this bridge methinks. Please find another bridge to skulk under.
To Anonymous at 8.09 PM.
It is critically important to have open discussions about science and medicine and, of course, the role of mainstream media. For example, the Cancer Society (2026) tells us:
“Alternative therapies are used instead of conventional medicines and treatments. Alternative therapies can be harmful and may delay or stop the cancer being treated effectively.
There is no evidence that any type of complementary or alternative therapy prevents or cures cancer.”
AND:
“Alternative therapies are used in the place of conventional medical treatment. They may claim to cure or slow the growth of cancer. These are scientifically unproven and if used instead of conventional treatment can cause serious problems and allow the cancer to spread. People who use alternative therapies without conventional treatment are more likely to die.
Some examples of alternative therapies are megavitamin therapy, diets that claim to treat cancer, coffee enemas, apricot kernels and alkaline water. These products can be harmful.”
Thus it is vital that our mainstream media sends the right messages to the general public.
Reference:
The Cancer Society (2026).
https://www.cancer.org.nz/cancer/cancer-treatment/complementary-traditional-and-alternative-therapies/
@Hugh - the New Zealand Media Council. Handles complaints for print and digital news sites, upholding principles like accuracy, independence, and fairness.l
The NZ herald. Sorry about the lower case H.
I do recall in recent history of NZ MSM, that we have a Canadian, now a registered NZder, who took upon himself to launch a "buy up" of NZ h (sorry about lower alpha) his objective to - "change the editorial standards of said paper".
Oh, buuger said then Chair & Board, who took themselves off to Aus Land, to converse with the big fell (?) who held lots of shares.
Upshot - Lady Chair of Board left, Steven Joyce (former MP/Min of Portfolios - Key Govt) joined as Chair, Canadian got on the board, so did Don Brash (he of the pouty lip, as NZh would not print his stuff ) - the word of the day - Editorial standards would change!
Yup said many Kiwi's - and sales of the paper dropped and will still drop when "word of mouth" re this article circulates.
Mind you it is (and always has been) a "left leaning paper" that has had some of the most prolific Labour supporting Journos write "stuff, about stuff" for along time.
What is that 'old' statement about Leopards?
Thanks Anon @ 10.14pm. I think we can safely say, then, that the New Zealand Media Council isn't doing its job, as MSM certainly don't seem to have anything to worry about!
The New Zealand Herald has a tabloid style of journalism.
The only thing missing are the generously endowed page three mammary models.
Rodney , What was the result in the 21st April 2026 PM formal confidence vote for you to declare it decisive, which is no greater than a final decision.?
What were the numbers because the public are unaware ?
Is the polling trend of National or the PM for that matter decisive ?
What is absolutely compelling is NZ public concern that the left wing fiscal wrecking machine aided and abetted by PM Luxon's lack lustre leadership may scrounge election victory in November over a coalition led by two excellent support parties and parliamentary teams .
Party Vote ACT and NZF with confidence.
If the Iran war continues for another few weeks NZ will have far more to worry about than the NZ Herald combined with TVNZ trying to engineer a political outcome they prefer.
Things are going to get very tight and tense and the media will have to keep its head screwed on or the country will fall apart.
I note that an article appeared the other day about the lack of cohesion in NZ society from the Helen Clark foundation.
I’m no fan of Helen Clarke but I do believe she is on to something.
Luxon is clearly focused on getting the country through the Middle East war in the best shape possible, having the media pick it apart just shows you how petty they are.
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.