Buying new kit often takes longer than a government lasts. The chain of sign-offs required often takes years. A single big purchase can outlast the government that started it.
The system still thinks in terms of ships and aircraft. In fact, how well a force fights now comes down to how well it can gather and sift information and then act on what it knows.
The Defence Capability Plan does say as much. It stresses the information domain, intelligence, digital overhaul and space. The strategy papers grasp the shift but the machinery that must deliver has not kept up.
Australia's 2023 Defence Strategic Review found the same thing. The Australian Defence Force was not set up or kitted out for the threats it faced, despite decades of heavy spending.
The review did not call for more money alone. It also called for faster procurement, including off-the-shelf technology. It signalled a shift of emphasis from hardware to joined-up fighting power. Australia had the money. It found a gap in the system rather than the chequebook.
New Zealand does not lack plans. We have a National Security Strategy, a Defence Policy and Strategy Statement, a government data strategy, a space strategy and a defence industry strategy. Five strategies, each sound on its own terms.
What we lack is the ability to turn any of them into real fighting strength before the world moves on.
For a small country, the highest payoff lies where nimbleness matters most: intelligence, digital links, open-source intelligence and space awareness. A well-run small state can punch above its weight in these fields. But these things are worth little if we cannot procure what we need in a timely way.
The chequebook is open. Whether New Zealand buys readiness or merely buys time hinges on whether we overhaul the system that spends the money.
The Defence Capability Plan does say as much. It stresses the information domain, intelligence, digital overhaul and space. The strategy papers grasp the shift but the machinery that must deliver has not kept up.
Australia's 2023 Defence Strategic Review found the same thing. The Australian Defence Force was not set up or kitted out for the threats it faced, despite decades of heavy spending.
The review did not call for more money alone. It also called for faster procurement, including off-the-shelf technology. It signalled a shift of emphasis from hardware to joined-up fighting power. Australia had the money. It found a gap in the system rather than the chequebook.
New Zealand does not lack plans. We have a National Security Strategy, a Defence Policy and Strategy Statement, a government data strategy, a space strategy and a defence industry strategy. Five strategies, each sound on its own terms.
What we lack is the ability to turn any of them into real fighting strength before the world moves on.
For a small country, the highest payoff lies where nimbleness matters most: intelligence, digital links, open-source intelligence and space awareness. A well-run small state can punch above its weight in these fields. But these things are worth little if we cannot procure what we need in a timely way.
The chequebook is open. Whether New Zealand buys readiness or merely buys time hinges on whether we overhaul the system that spends the money.
Explore John's research through our new research note and watch the webinar to hear why getting the system right matters more than the $12 billion itself.
General John Howard is a retired military leader who now works with boards and senior executives as a private advisor on strategy, risk and organisational
performance. This article was sourced HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.