Pages

Thursday, August 6, 2026

Kerre Woodham: It's getting harder to decide who to vote for


A friend of mine said to me the other day, “do you have the cliff notes of Labour's policies going into the election? I haven't heard much from Chris Hipkins.” I said, “well, you haven't heard much from Chris Hipkins because he doesn't need to say much.” The best tactic for Labour right now, and they've they copped onto that very early, was to stay shtum and let National and its coalition partners do their very best to lose the election. Christopher Luxon's suck it up cupcake to business owners in Rotorua and then the subsequent apology was yet another case of him having to explain himself. “I didn't mean it like that, you know what I'm saying.” He's done it so many times before. He did it with the bottom feeders comment, he did it with the sorted comment. He doesn't mean it, but it comes across badly, it's mischaracterised, it's misrepresented, he has to explain himself, and when you're explaining, you're losing.

He doesn't trust journalists because he feels he's misrepresented, mischaracterised, misspoke every time he opens his mouth, but then that makes it very difficult to get the message across that National is the best party to lead the country. Why should Hipkins open his mouth? He'll only cop flak every time he does. Far better to stay shtum. He doesn't need to say anything. And it's Luxon's inability to connect with the public. One on one, he's absolutely fine as anyone who has met him can attest. As an orator, yeah, not so much. It's costing National. I mean, look at Jacinda Ardern. She was able to sell us a whole bunch of nothing in 2017, and then during Covid was able to sell us a whole bunch of draconian, and then increasingly odd, nonsensical rules that people, a lot of people just swallowed. And that was because she had the ability to communicate and connect.

It's a shame that personalities play such a big part in politics, but that's the reality. Always has been. If you go back to the fourth Labour Government, David Lange was selected, elected, voted in as a leader because he could sell incredibly divisive and game changing and society changing policies to the electorate. You had a group of people who were working very hard on completely transforming New Zealand, and he was sold to the New Zealand public as “you can trust me, nothing can go wrong while I'm in charge”, and people believed it. They would never have got away with introducing as many of the radical policies that they introduced without having a brilliant communicator at the helm.

When I read Sir Ian Taylor's opinion piece in Stuff this morning, I thought, yeah, I could have written this myself, but I didn't, and I probably wouldn't have written it as well. But I am so exactly like Sir Ian Taylor, apart from the brilliant creative and millionaire bit – I'm just nodding along as I'm reading it. Like Sir Ian, for most of my life, I have been a centre left voter. Like Sir Ian, I too turned off them in Covid when their ability to deliver on the most basic of the policies became abundantly clear and that there were a bunch of numpties trying to put legislation in place. Like Sir Ian, I found National MPs were willing to listen and they were coming up with good sound policy they'd been working on in Opposition. I liked many of their would-be ministers and I really hoped that by voting centre right, we'd find a clear path through the mess that had been left behind.

But then along came ACT and New Zealand First, and as Sir Ian says, and I quote, “I was left with the uncomfortable realisation that my vote had helped create a coalition increasingly shaped by minority party ideologies that ran directly against many of the things I believed in.” Amen, Sir Ian, that's exactly how I feel. I'm okay with with centre right, but with those divisive policies from ACT and now —now that it's election year— from New Zealand First, they don't sit well with me. And that's why people are looking at TOP and that's why Sir Ian says he's listening. I know their policies are ill thought out and poorly costed, but so are New Zealand First's. And if I'm going to have a difficult minor party in a coalition or sitting on the benches, I'd rather have young people there than a bunch of old men who represent self-interest and dog whistle politics.

How on earth can you have Winston Peters doing a brilliant job as Foreign Affairs Minister and then he turns into a foaming racist in election year? If he was racist to his core, you'd be like, okay, well, he's a rac, but he's not. He's just appealing to racists because he knows that's where he'll get his votes. He knows that there will be a lot of people who vote for New Zealand First because they don't like others. I mean, probably as far as I'm concerned, reason will prevail. I'm doing the whichparty.nz almost weekly, which helps you sort out who to vote for. I'm looking at the ministers in the Coalition Government and comparing them to their counterparts on the left, and the vast majority of government ministers are head and shoulders above the alternative in my mind. But I do not think I have ever felt less inspired, less hopeful about an election, ever.

Kerre McIvor, is a journalist, radio presenter, author and columnist. Currently hosts the Kerre Woodham mornings show on Newstalk ZB - where this article was sourced.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

It’s funny people paint act as far right - they really just stand for policies that were just common sense and very centrist about 30yrs ago - and msm are just out to get anyone from the coalition with anything they can- so I know who I’m voting for….ACT

Anonymous said...

"It's getting harder to decide who to vote for"?
Not really.
If you rule out the hardcore socialism and those who spout Marxist poison.
You are not serious are you about voting again for anything RED?
Did you have a section of brain removed recently?

Anonymous said...

So ACT's TPM was divisive and the likes of TOP's candidate (Kingdon-Bebb), who co-authored He Puapua, is not?

Really Kerre, like the man you align with, it appears you can't discern fact from fiction and what political path really would be good (or bad) for our country.

Anonymous said...

Either nz first or act is the common sense vote. Sir Ian Taylor was being interviewed this morning being interviewed and said he was really interested in the Opportunity party and that Q was coming to his business conference. When he was asked about which policies of her party that he liked, he said he hadn't looked into their policies. This is the problem with fellow nzers in general. We have not learned from the Ardern disaster.

Anonymous said...

While the cults (I have not mis-spelled that word) now seeking your vote in November will promise fidelity and honesty of intention the actuality will be, as you well know from experience, vastly different. Any realistic voter from the past now knows that voting is, sadly, a sick joke. This is why it is so hard to cast your vote. Do I vote for these lefty wanna-be tyrants, or these comatose perhaps-but-probably -not-really centrists? At least we can be absolutely certain that what they promise will not be delivered, and what they never mentioned will be thrust down our votes with malevolent force. So, I will seek out the large red box that is labelled, in block letters, NONE OF THE ABOVE, and hope my team comes home victorious.

Anonymous said...

There was no "foaming racism" from Peters. There was a quip against communist China that is being reframed as racism, when that wasn't the intention at all. That Luxon and Woodham see it the other way tells you all you need to know about the lens through which they see reality.

Anonymous said...

We all know the cliff notes for labors “policies”

Tax tax & tax with a massive side order of printed/borrowed monies 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤣

Anonymous said...

Certainly cannot vote for Labour, Greens, Opportunity (Labour Light). Winston thinks that NZ can survive with zero immigration (of course Maori Party believe that, too). So, we lose half our workers. Only rational choices remaining.

Post a Comment

Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.