In May the Press published a summary of a Ministry
for the Environment (MfE )report extolling the improvements in health which
have been achieved in New Zealand by the reduction in concentrations of PM10
in the air we breathe.
The report said an 8 per cent nation-wide reduction between 2006 and 2012 resulted in 14 per cent fewer deaths and 15 per cent fewer hospital admissions from man made air pollution. Other reports from the Ministry say that respiratory health is the main effect. These numbers came from a model relating numbers of premature deaths and hospital admissions to measured or estimated concentrations of PM10.
The report said an 8 per cent nation-wide reduction between 2006 and 2012 resulted in 14 per cent fewer deaths and 15 per cent fewer hospital admissions from man made air pollution. Other reports from the Ministry say that respiratory health is the main effect. These numbers came from a model relating numbers of premature deaths and hospital admissions to measured or estimated concentrations of PM10.
What the Press (Fairfax NZ) report did not say
was that the health impacts were not derived from hospital records or
mortality statistics (which seems strange seeing that one of the contributors
to the report was the official Government Statistician). This is "I
say so" science. The sort the church authorities relied on to prove the
sun went round the earth each day. Not the "You can see so" science
of Galileo and Copernicus.

