Pages

Monday, March 21, 2022

Bryce Edwards: Labour needs to rediscover its political soul


In the last few days the Labour Government has come in for criticism for its panicked pandering to opinion polls. Last week it announced petrol tax cuts and reduced public transport fares. This was in response to pressure from opponents and the public who alleged the Government was out of touch on the cost of living crisis, and following a poll showing Labour behind National.

Likewise, the Government has decided to fast-forward the dismantling of the Covid protections framework – expect to see Covid passes and mandates being phased out. This all has the appearance of Labour choosing pragmatism over principle.

TVNZ’s Jack Tame has been scathing, telling his Newstalk ZB audience on Saturday that the recent petrol tax cuts were a kneejerk reaction: “The truth is, petrol taxes would never have been cut if Labour had been well ahead in last week’s poll. They saw the poll numbers. They freaked out. They dropped almost $400m to try and win back some popularity.” Tame argued that there are more targeted ways to relieve the cost of living crisis.

He calls the government’s actions “cowardly”, “cynical and reactionary”, concluding: “Once again, Jacinda Ardern’s Government has shown it’s more interested in doing what is popular than what is right.”

Tame’s point is that the petrol tax cuts went against the bigger and longer-term goal of shifting people off reliance on fossil fuels through higher prices. He argues that other crises such as housing see the Government only ever thinking about the short-term.

In terms of the transport package, there’s evidence Tame is right. On Friday the Government admitted that the decision had been rushed into implementation bypassing the usual scrutiny of officials. Finance Minister Grant Robertson admitted that Cabinet decided to sidestep putting the tax cuts through a Regulatory Impact Analysis in which the proposal’s strengths and weaknesses, as well as alternatives, are considered by relevant government agencies. Instead, Cabinet agreed to a “post-implementation assessment”.

The website Interest.co.nz asked economists for their view on the reforms: “The policy didn’t meet the sniff test of the economists interest.co.nz spoke to, who characterised it as political, reactionary, poorly targeted, short-termist and interventionist.”

Of course, the counter argument is that the Government was listening to the public and being nimble in their response. Focus groups and market research would have given the Government a good steer on exactly what pressures were afflicting the public and how to address them.

It seems that the Government has to resort to a reactive approach instead of being proactive because it lacks any real underpinning vision about where it wants to take the country. To have direction, political leaders need to have policy, values, and be embedded in a milieu of critical thinking and innovation.

This is traditionally what a political party is. It’s a big think tank of on-the-ground policy development based on a vision of a particular sort of world that it wants to create. The problem for Ardern and her colleague is that this is entirely lacking for them. There is no mass membership party feeding ideas and policies up from its base. In fact, the last Labour Party annual conference showed that the party barely has any debate at all, and certainly no real decision making powers like it used to.

Without a useful anchor in society, the Labour Government is now just floating around, lost at sea, only reacting to events as they arise. It means the party and government have little chance of taking the country anywhere, and voters will eventually tire of its managerial approach. To sell itself based on its competence during the Covid crisis is not going to work again at the next election – especially since much of that competence has been more questionable since 2020.

Leftwing blogger Steven Cowan wrote in the weekend that Labour’s values now seem to be “defending the status quo” and “staying in power”, which is hardly very inspirational. Labour used to stand for more than that.

And for Cowan the problem is that voters don’t have much choice of parties: “Elections have been captured by big money, lobbyists and the media while the policy convergence between the present parliamentary parties has crushed real choice. It has produced disenfranchisement and disillusionment”.

Columnist Andrea Vance is even more scathing of where Labour values have gone, writing yesterday: “In their second term, Labour has become adept at downplaying their mistakes, discrediting those who criticise, encouraging misinformation and diverting attention from bad news, while wrapping themselves in meaningless cultural signals.”

The Government can jettison the more unpopular parts of its reform programme – especially things like its hate speech law reforms, and perhaps Three Waters – but what will these be replaced with? When a party lacks connection to its voter base, and has no strong ideological underpinnings, it is forced to make up policies as it goes, reacting to opinion polls. It means that badly formulated policies like KiwiBuild are quickly dreamt up, and just as quickly discarded when they become embarrassing. Cycling bridges are announced and then un-announced, again all in reaction to polls.

The even bigger problem is that Labour has forgotten its own traditional voter base. This is observable in the fact that they have overseen a massive transfer of wealth to the rich, while the poor have simply got poorer. Bernard Hickey says this transfer has been more than $1 trillion. Hence Duncan Garner writes today in the NBR, “Labour has served the wealthiest Kiwis to a high standard indeed during this pandemic. And they won’t be thanked, they’ll be shown the door. More than $20b was spent on wage subsidies alone, paid to bosses to help pay wages. Then there was the Reserve Bank’s aggressive loosening of monetary policy, which saw some homeowners gain billions of dollars in wealth as housing prices soared while the poor were still in a motel waiting for a phone call from Kāinga Ora.”

This is why transformation is not possible under Labour at the moment, and why the party has become a conservative one. It’s been cut adrift from its original principles and support bases. This makes it more likely to lose power at the next election. Ultimately Labour needs to find a way to reconnect with some of its original working class constituents and ideologies. That’s the political soul of the Labour Party, and something that seems sorely missing at the moment.

Dr Bryce Edwards is a politics lecturer at Victoria University and director of Critical Politics, a project focused on researching New Zealand politics and society.

4 comments:

Kiwialan said...

Think Tank are the key words in this article. To think you need a brain capable of critical thinking and problem solving which is a big problem for this bunch of woke socialists trying to govern us. Most of them wouldn't have the brain power to save themselves, they have had their noses in the union, academic or treaty trough for life and have no idea of the real world or solving real world problems. They bluster, bully and bring out the racist term to close down reasonable argument. Kiwialan.

DeeM said...

Jack Tame is scathing that the government cut petrol taxes to help most Kiwis make ends meet because Jack's more worried about the long-term, completely theoretical effects of climate change.
I realise that Jack probably spends more in hair products and teeth whitener each week than an average family spends on petrol, and he perfectly demonstrates the total disregard elites like him have for everyone else.
Why would anyone take Jack's advice on anything is the real question. What is Jack an expert on - smiling coyly at a camera while asking patsy questions of any Labour or Green MP he interviews? Yes, that's about it!

But Robbo did admit not subjecting the petrol price cut to the rigours of a Regulatory Impact Analysis. Thank Christ because that would have taken months, only to come up with a load of old crap about how any taxes would have be Treaty-centric and involve full consultation with Tangata whenua.
Maybe Labour should shoot from the hip more often. At least they have a small chance of achieving something.

But then Bryce persists with the notion that Labour have no vision of where it wants to take the country. Actually Bryce they do and you've written about it before so you should know better. It's called He Puapua and that is their one and only vision which they have pursued with determination through a pandemic.
They are completely inept at everything else and finally the public are recognising that.

Labour is WOKE. It hasn't got a soul anymore. Just like the UK Labour Party and the US Democrats, it follows along a few years behind enacting all the same failed bullshit that they do.
And then claims to be leading the way!

Terry Morrissey said...

“Once again, Jacinda Ardern’s Government has shown it’s more interested in doing what is popular than what is right.” Since when has this government done what is popular? They would be the most reviled government in the history of New Zealand.
“This is traditionally what a political party is. It’s a big think tank of on-the-ground policy development based on a vision of a particular sort of world that it wants to create. The problem for Ardern and her colleague is that this is entirely lacking for them.” That then makes it a dictatorship under the control of a demented communist.
“This all has the appearance of Labour choosing pragmatism over principle.” No.They have completely lost the plot.
“Tame’s point is that the petrol tax cuts went against the bigger and longer-term goal of shifting people off reliance on fossil fuels through higher prices. He argues that other crises such as housing see the Government only ever thinking about the short-term.” Another instance of a journalist’s true colours creeping into his interviewing slant. An obvious acolyte of the UNCCC, the greens and Al gore.
“Of course, the counter argument is that the Government was listening to the public and being nimble in their response.” Not on this planet they don’t.
Columnist Andrea Vance is even more scathing of where Labour values have gone, writing yesterday: “In their second term, Labour has become adept at downplaying their mistakes, discrediting those who criticise, encouraging misinformation and diverting attention from bad news, while wrapping themselves in meaningless cultural signals.” Now that is encouraging. How did that get printed?
“This is why transformation is not possible under Labour at the moment, and why the party has become a conservative one.”
The labour cult is NOT conservative. They are definitely communist.
Just as a point of interest, of 23 of labour’s top people, at least 13 are female. To quote Michael Caine, “Not many people know that.”

Ian Fryer said...

Actually Bryce is incorrect. They know exactly where they are going
He Puapua will destroy our country. Its unconstitutional and not campaigned upon. They are taking their lead from the World Economic Forum and the Great Reset. He is correct.in saying though that traditional Labour values are gone. Labour voters also don't want or like He Puapua. They don't want to be hijacked by Maori Elitists out of touch with their own people.