"Frontline police told to ‘consider necessity’ of bail arrests as NZ’s largest prison nears capacity"
There are two immediate problems with the headline.
How can any New Zealand prison be near capacity when the prison population has been actively reduced by well over twenty percent since Labour became government?
(Click on image to enlarge)
The possibility arises that one singular prison might still be "nearing capacity" but on reading that the prison in question is Rimutaka, that is also suspect.
In December 2017 the population at Rimutaka was 1,097.
At December 2022 it was 751. More than 300 fewer prisoners (and it is extremely unlikely that in the three months since it has radically changed.)
The second problem with the headline is that Rimutaka is not New Zealand's largest prison. The two Auckland facilities each have consistently larger populations.
The article mentions none of this. There is no discussion about WHY Rimutaka is "nearing capacity." Is it an issue of resourcing? Not enough staff? In recent years Rimutaka reopened some of its older buildings to house overflow from Arohata so it seems unlikely to be a physical capacity problem.
There are some fundamental questions that arise out of a directive to police to make other provision for detainees because Rimutaka is "nearing capacity" that haven't been asked.
Or if they were, they haven't been answered.
Despite Correction's high-profile recruitment campaign, I suspect the directive is based on the safety of corrections officers if staff/prisoner ratios get too high. And that is a valid concern.
But to have come to this dangerous impasse is more evidence of a government failing and flailing with its lack of consistent, coherent policy and planning.
Lindsay Mitchell is a welfare commentator who blogs HERE.
(Click on image to enlarge)
The possibility arises that one singular prison might still be "nearing capacity" but on reading that the prison in question is Rimutaka, that is also suspect.
In December 2017 the population at Rimutaka was 1,097.
At December 2022 it was 751. More than 300 fewer prisoners (and it is extremely unlikely that in the three months since it has radically changed.)
The second problem with the headline is that Rimutaka is not New Zealand's largest prison. The two Auckland facilities each have consistently larger populations.
The article mentions none of this. There is no discussion about WHY Rimutaka is "nearing capacity." Is it an issue of resourcing? Not enough staff? In recent years Rimutaka reopened some of its older buildings to house overflow from Arohata so it seems unlikely to be a physical capacity problem.
There are some fundamental questions that arise out of a directive to police to make other provision for detainees because Rimutaka is "nearing capacity" that haven't been asked.
Or if they were, they haven't been answered.
Despite Correction's high-profile recruitment campaign, I suspect the directive is based on the safety of corrections officers if staff/prisoner ratios get too high. And that is a valid concern.
But to have come to this dangerous impasse is more evidence of a government failing and flailing with its lack of consistent, coherent policy and planning.
Lindsay Mitchell is a welfare commentator who blogs HERE.
1 comment:
So now the police can use their discretion as to whether a bail jumper has broken the law. Surely if an offender on bail breaks his bail conditions he must be arrested and taken into custody. If that is not the case we may as well do away with the police and the judiciary. The whole system is becoming a farce, and the present police hierarchy and government are nothing more than a sick joke.
Post a Comment