Pages

Friday, August 23, 2024

Francesca Rudkin: What should councils be funding?


Yesterday the Prime Minister spoke at the Local Government NZ (LGNZ) conference, warning councils to restrain their spending to the basics or run the risk of having your hand forced by central government.

Apparently, the remarks got a frosty reception – possibly because no one likes being told off and possibly because since Covid all some councils have been doing is going through their budgets line by line.

Local Government Minister Simeon Brown backed up the Prime Ministers thoughts on the Mike Hosking Breakfast this morning.

“The reality is, with an average 15% rate increase, our expectation is that councils get on with the work just like Government has had to do, go line by line, cut the waste, focus on the basics and ensure that they can pass those cost savings on to ratepayers at this cost of living crisis time. So, you know we're doing our part. We've also put in place Local Water Done Well, which gives councils far greater access financing for water infrastructure, that means they should be able to do that and reduce the cost burden on ratepayers.”

Simeon Brown also said yesterday: “Council rates are increasing by around 15 per cent on average this year, which is more than four times the rate of inflation. This is unacceptable and councils must ensure they are doing everything they can to reduce pressure on ratepayers.”

As difficult as it was to hear for some councils, it’s hard to argue with the sentiment, right? Regardless of whether we’re tightening our belts after a global pandemic or not, we expect our councils to always be making sensible funding decisions. To focus on core council activities and maintain assets for the future.

This week we also saw the released of a report into Local Government performance, that warned councils were not replacing ageing infrastructure to the extent they should be.

Different councils around the country have different issues – but they have potential hefty rate rises in common and a need for central government to help fund infrastructure.

If yesterday’s speech was anything to go by, then the time for handouts is over. Councils are about to negotiate their city deals with central government to line up funding, and this speech is a clear warning to some councils you might have to adjust your spending and your wish list.

In regard to handing out cold hard cash to help councils, the Prime Minister made it very clear that the previous government might have taken that approach, but the party is over.

Simeon Brown, inspired by the New South Wales model, has also floated the idea of putting in place a regulator, which regulates what price increases can be put on for non-core programmes that councils do. The aim of this is to maintain cost controls for councils, something which he believes we’re not currently seeing. Is this necessary? It feels a little too controlling – but you might feel your local council needs another layer of control.

So, for cental government it’s all about rubbish, roads and water – and price caps.

As a rate payer, this all sounds good – but we all have different ideas of what should be a core function of a council. Are libraries and sports fields and parks as important as rubbish, roads and water?

What do you want to see your council spend money on? What are the priorities for you and what would you like dropped?

Francesca is a well known film reviewer, writes for NZ Herald's Timeout magazine, and contributes to Jack Tame's Newstalk show. This article was first published HERE

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

When Wellingtonians vote for people like Tori as their mayor, and Genter & Paul as their local MPs, they deserve everything they get. Cycleways, gridlocked traffic, expensive pet projects, leaky pipes and budget blowouts has been what they choose, so why should the taxpayer be left subsidizing their wacky choices.

Anonymous said...

Just for starters they can stop wasting resources on all the Marxist "work" on woke DEI, making gestures "on our behalf" regarding Gaza and Maori wards.

Anonymous said...

"Are libraries and sports fields and parks as important as rubbish, roads and water? " Hipkins appears to think that PM Luxon should go to the local library to be educated on things Treaty - how could that be considered a reasonable strategy when libraries like Hutt refuse to hold info like Sir Apirana's 1922 explanation or Tross Publications that carry more Treaty truth than Hipkins can handle? Let's face it when asked what was in the Treaty Article 1 PM Ardern did not have a blessed clue. Mind you, if you go to a library, a pre-requisite to learning is actually reading/assimilating the information within - assuming they stock the books with balanced and complete material and do not exercise leftist/Marxist censorship.