If what I have listened to recently is true, then yes, Labour and National most definitely are. My source is a podcast from Stop Co-Governance. This is a podcast that talks about matters of race with particular regard to Māori. I put credence on what is discussed for ONE reason: it goes a long way to explaining Luxon’s behaviour and attitude when it comes to Māori issues.
The matters referred to started with the Key Government, when they were in coalition with the Māori Party. We are all aware Key has been mentoring Luxon. The ‘game’ is the tribal takeover of New Zealand. It is based on an article written by someone calling themselves Pee Kay. This person suggests National is working with the Māori activists to take over the country. That sounds pretty unbelievable…until you look at National’s attitude on these matters.
The Key Government and the Māori Party, through their confidence and supply arrangements, began doing trade-offs with each other. Effectively: you scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours. From that point, the Māori sovereignty activists’ belief in their agenda was amplified and they began getting serious traction towards achieving their goals of a new constitution and dual sovereignty. There was also the goal of FULL MĀORI CONTROL BY 2040. Two years later, in 2010, Key announced the government’s support for the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
Then, in 2019, the Labour Party commissioned a group of university academics to write the He Puapua Report. This is basically a blueprint for the takeover of New Zealand by Māori activists. All of the above, and what has come since, is based on the myth that there was a ‘partnership’ between Māori and the Crown. That means everything – power, resources, etc – was supposed to be shared. This, as we know, is totally untrue.
But He Puapua went beyond sharing. It was the founding document to replace our democracy – a radical restructure that comprises a Māori government and a government for Non-Māori. Here’s the kicker: a structure where Māori have the POWER OF VETO. And what that effectively means is Māori ARE the government. Claire Charters, the lead author of the report, wants Māori sovereignty enshrined in law as soon as possible. This is because of the terrible effects of colonisation on Māori.
Charters then makes the outrageous claim – a blatant lie – that “the proven effectiveness of Māori leading their own solutions has been demonstrated numerous times in Aotearoa”. If that were true, then why are the statistics the way they are: all negative in the case of Māori. This nonsense re the effects of colonisation and the myth of sovereignty is still being perpetuated by Waititi and the Māori Party now.
Yet, at the Kohimārama Conference in 1860, where 144 chiefs met after trialling the Treaty for 20 years, they said they wanted four things – British government, British law, Christianity and the Queen and the Governor to be their parents. Pee Kay, the writer of the article, asks who the puppeteer that is running this radical activist movement is. He suspects it’s the Iwi Leaders Forum. This group, formed in 2005, is made up of the chairs from 71 tribes whose stated claim is Māori autonomy and self-governance, with Māori being in control of the government.
It was the brainchild of Mark Solomon, a former leader of Ngāi Tahu, and others involved include Margaret Mutu and Tuku Morgan. Pee Kay asks who is funding this group. Is it the government and us the taxpayers? This is something the group strenuously denied. But thanks to Winston Peters doing some digging in 2013, we found out IT WAS. Three million was given to prepare an application by the group to become a “commissioning agency” responsible for millions of dollars in funding to Whānau Ora.
They were being given OUR money to be used in applying for even more money. Honestly, you couldn’t make this stuff up…but it gets worse. Pee Kay found evidence the Ministry of Environment indirectly gave them $3.8 million in the years 2012–2017. That was right in the middle of the Key Government, which means, in effect, funding was coming from the NATIONAL PARTY. The obvious next question is: what about all the other ministries. Did they give money as well?
The National Party have had a very close – chummy – relationship with the Iwi Leaders Forum. During the Key years, 2009 to 2017, they met 44 times. Of those 44, only 15 had a discussion topic. What was discussed in those 29 meetings that the public are unaware of? What we have here is a problem with both the National and Labour parties in terms of getting too close to those who hold the reins of power in Māoridom.
You should now understand the reluctance of Luxon to move on the race issues he campaigned on and his reluctance to support the Treaty Principles Bill. There is every reason to suspect he’s being held to ransom by the likes of the people Pee Kay mentions. Another question is how close are the Māori Party to these people. Hipkins will be no different to Luxon in handling these matters. They are probably both in the same waka and paddling furiously for Māori dominance.
JC is a right-wing crusader. Reached an age that embodies the dictum only the good die young. This article was first published HERE
The Key Government and the Māori Party, through their confidence and supply arrangements, began doing trade-offs with each other. Effectively: you scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours. From that point, the Māori sovereignty activists’ belief in their agenda was amplified and they began getting serious traction towards achieving their goals of a new constitution and dual sovereignty. There was also the goal of FULL MĀORI CONTROL BY 2040. Two years later, in 2010, Key announced the government’s support for the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
Then, in 2019, the Labour Party commissioned a group of university academics to write the He Puapua Report. This is basically a blueprint for the takeover of New Zealand by Māori activists. All of the above, and what has come since, is based on the myth that there was a ‘partnership’ between Māori and the Crown. That means everything – power, resources, etc – was supposed to be shared. This, as we know, is totally untrue.
But He Puapua went beyond sharing. It was the founding document to replace our democracy – a radical restructure that comprises a Māori government and a government for Non-Māori. Here’s the kicker: a structure where Māori have the POWER OF VETO. And what that effectively means is Māori ARE the government. Claire Charters, the lead author of the report, wants Māori sovereignty enshrined in law as soon as possible. This is because of the terrible effects of colonisation on Māori.
Charters then makes the outrageous claim – a blatant lie – that “the proven effectiveness of Māori leading their own solutions has been demonstrated numerous times in Aotearoa”. If that were true, then why are the statistics the way they are: all negative in the case of Māori. This nonsense re the effects of colonisation and the myth of sovereignty is still being perpetuated by Waititi and the Māori Party now.
Yet, at the Kohimārama Conference in 1860, where 144 chiefs met after trialling the Treaty for 20 years, they said they wanted four things – British government, British law, Christianity and the Queen and the Governor to be their parents. Pee Kay, the writer of the article, asks who the puppeteer that is running this radical activist movement is. He suspects it’s the Iwi Leaders Forum. This group, formed in 2005, is made up of the chairs from 71 tribes whose stated claim is Māori autonomy and self-governance, with Māori being in control of the government.
It was the brainchild of Mark Solomon, a former leader of Ngāi Tahu, and others involved include Margaret Mutu and Tuku Morgan. Pee Kay asks who is funding this group. Is it the government and us the taxpayers? This is something the group strenuously denied. But thanks to Winston Peters doing some digging in 2013, we found out IT WAS. Three million was given to prepare an application by the group to become a “commissioning agency” responsible for millions of dollars in funding to Whānau Ora.
They were being given OUR money to be used in applying for even more money. Honestly, you couldn’t make this stuff up…but it gets worse. Pee Kay found evidence the Ministry of Environment indirectly gave them $3.8 million in the years 2012–2017. That was right in the middle of the Key Government, which means, in effect, funding was coming from the NATIONAL PARTY. The obvious next question is: what about all the other ministries. Did they give money as well?
The National Party have had a very close – chummy – relationship with the Iwi Leaders Forum. During the Key years, 2009 to 2017, they met 44 times. Of those 44, only 15 had a discussion topic. What was discussed in those 29 meetings that the public are unaware of? What we have here is a problem with both the National and Labour parties in terms of getting too close to those who hold the reins of power in Māoridom.
You should now understand the reluctance of Luxon to move on the race issues he campaigned on and his reluctance to support the Treaty Principles Bill. There is every reason to suspect he’s being held to ransom by the likes of the people Pee Kay mentions. Another question is how close are the Māori Party to these people. Hipkins will be no different to Luxon in handling these matters. They are probably both in the same waka and paddling furiously for Māori dominance.
JC is a right-wing crusader. Reached an age that embodies the dictum only the good die young. This article was first published HERE
10 comments:
We have had decades of National leaders and prominent MP’s discreetly and quietly leading us to the point New Zealand now finds itself at.
National governments have a long history of placating Maori activists demands with, quite often, surreptitious favouritism.
John Key, in particular, along with and treaty Minister Finlayson were extremely inclined to bend to the Maori Elites wishes. Key secretly (although he is want to claim otherwise) sent Pita Sharples to the United Nations to sign the UN Declaration of Rights of Indigenous People, UNDRIP.
Post the signing, Foreign Affairs Minister at the time, Murray McCully, stated that “…the signing the document will allow New Zealand to clarify its position and exclude itself from some aspects of the agreement which relate to the law in this country”. How has that worked out Murray?
Finlayson has never been shy about making known his endorsement of co-governance. He has asked. “Why should the state be the one to control everything? Why can’t there be principles of sharing power?”
And “I will continue to talk about co-governance as something to be embraced, not feared — and some people won’t like it. Bad luck.”
Interestingly, John Key’s government, in 2009, determined to allow the Tino Rangatiratanga flag to fly alongside the New Zealand flag on the Auckland Harbour Bridge.
The Tino Rangatiratanga flag is now regularly flown at international cricket, womens rugby and at the FIFA Women's World Cup in New Zealand 2023, the Tino Rangatiratanga flag took centre stage at every match.
Is this simply corporate “virtue signalling” or further evidence of the incremental creep of Maori Sovereignty?
I do not believe they did not know the Tino Rangatiratanga flag is the emblem of maori self-determination, sovereignty, independence and autonomy!
And while taxpayer money is thrown at Māori only schemes/settlements, NZ’s economy will keep deteriorating and the divide between Māori and non-Māori widens. Apartheid moving strongly ahead.
The logic is pretty clear. Luxon's behaving like a scalded cat over the TPB was telling on all this. The Iwi chairs forum has him in its thrall and is definitely pulling the strings. Scissors anyone?
Luxon is the Prime Minister, he and his party are the dominant party in the coalition. He has the support of the other two party's. He campaigned on removing race issues from legislation.
He has zero reason for not acting on the mandate given to his Government by the people.
Your article does not explain his treasonous stance.
As Julian Batchelor has explained over and over, the evidence is that Luxon is complicit in the on going destruction of New Zealand democracy, as are all the members of his party.
The complexity of the reasoning behind this stretches way back before John Key or Christopher Luxon entered politics.
Current issues are but a moment in time on the unstoppable march through our world of the Marxist revolution.
Very interesting article JC. “Something is rotten in the state of Denmark”. This would indeed explain Luxon’s weird behaviour. National and Labour both need to come clean on their alliances and policies to do with maori and the future of NZ before the next election. No more dissembling and skirting the issues like Luxon got away with last time. He implied lots but committed to nothing. Dirty play from National - and perhaps even dirtier than we have realised to date. Furthermore, tax payers should not be funding any organisation whose purpose involves destroying or perverting our national sovereignty and parliament. Helen Clark had it right on our foreshore and seabed law, but I’m beginning to wish her govt hadn’t dropped our law to do with sedition.
Why do these politicians pander to the Maori radicals?
It seems to be all part of a very patient long-term plan to destroy the British foundation of this country, and thus its culture, its economy, and its place in the civilised world. Both major parties appear to be completely on board with this overarching aim. Unless we, the general public, wake up to this process that we are living through the future for our children and grandchildren will be the stuff of nightmares.
Luxon is has been brainwashed by so many different forces. I have been beating a drum about him for quite a while. Read his 2025 Waitangi Day speech to Ngai Tahu. Grovelling all the way. Clichés, Slogans, Taglines all through it. Sounded like a travelling salesman. The 2025 Ngai Tahu speech was very different to the 2024 speech which was delivered at Waitangi.
Sample 2025 quotes:
“We want to shift decision-making away from central Government to iwi and communities where real change happens.”
“Iwi leaders and communities will continue to shape the political landscape with constructive partnerships that hold the Government accountable and work for the benefit of all.”
We are entering QUISLING and TREASON territory !!!
Speech Links:
2025 https://community.scoop.co.nz/2025/02/waitangi-day-speech-to-ngai-tahu-onuku-marae/
2024 https://www.beehive.govt.nz/speech/rt-hon-christopher-luxon-waitangi-speech
This story needs to be glued to every lamp post in NZ since the msm won't carry it. It is way too important a truth, so we should be asking Winston and Seymour what they are intending to do about it since they are in bed with a quisling.
If Winston could put his ego (and his personal dislike of David Seymour) in his back pocket for a while and really liase with Act, I'm sure between them they could persuade Mr Luxon to change his ways. But I cannot see that happening
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.