However my use is more in reference to modern day New Zealand political parties who are in danger of becoming irrelevant in the minds of those who are finding things difficult just trying to feed, house, clothe and educate their families. Ironically, it has little to do with loyalty to outmoded doctrines or philosophies of yesteryear.
For example, current political party leaders of all persuasions are having difficulty reconciling their actions, comments and support for policies that appear to be in direct contradiction with their party’s founding principles.
As a consequence voters are beginning to question whether this equivocation on most of the big issues confronting the nation is paramount to a betrayal that will ultimately cost the leader their job.
In the circumstances, it appears we are in for a time when leadership challenges become common place and who knows where that will end come the General Election in 2026.
Maybe I am reading too much into recent events that suggest both the current main party leaders - Luxon and Hipkins, plus the co-leaders of Te Pati Maori are all carrying the can for misdeeds or utterances from rebel members of their own caucuses.
Unfortunately for National and the Government, Luxon’s problem is more to do with his tendancy to back “Woke” policies of foreign governments that are the antipathy of modern conservative belief which is the cause of rumblings of discontent within the membership. For him this stance, if continued, could be terminal.
On the other hand, Hipkins too often appears like a possum caught in the headlights where his instinctive reaction is to blame his parlous position on something or someone else - but in politics the best strategy is often to admit a mistake that was avoidable and promise to do better.
Meanwhile the Te Pati Maori leadership are becoming collateral damage of their own arrogant, racist response to every proposal put before the House that doesn’t give Maori everything they consider their entitlement under the false interpretation of the Treaty of Waitangi.
My guess is that these leadership questions - if they continue, particularly within the “Parties of the Left”, will make it almost impossible for the return of a three party Labour led Government in November next year. On current polling, Labour and the Greens can’t do it on their own.
That isn’t to say that the current Coalition parties don’t have problems of their own although it would appear that leadership of both Act and NZ First is secure and that of National will be almost totally dependant of Caucus reaction to the Prime Minister’s performance in the next few months.
Personally, I would back a leadership change mainly because there are a couple of standout performers in the current cabinet, namely the Education Minister Erica Stanford and even Chris Bishop, who are capable of stopping the erosion of support from those disenchanted with Christopher Luxon.
But irrespective of who leads the Coalition into the next election, the thing that will ensure victory more than anything else is the campaign slogan providing voters with a reason for ticking the box in their favour.
Using a famous quotation from former President JF Kennedy: “Ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country” - our Coalition slogan should be “We will provide the opportunities for you to do it for yourselves.”
Our Governments’ main responsibility should always be to create an environment that encourages individual endeavour and enterprise.
It should be a “hand up” rather than a “handout”.
Simple really.
Clive Bibby is a commentator, consultant, farmer and community leader, who lives in Tolaga Bay.

4 comments:
Like economists predicted 8 of the last 5 recessions, breaking views authors predicted 10 of the last 0 national party leadership challenges.
I spoke to a senior Cabinet member recently who told me they're all very happy with Luxons leadership.
Kiwi battlers aren't as pleased with Luxon though as their costs keep going up.
Price colluding Aussie banks made $8b in excess profits this year. Every one of those kiwi dollars are taken back to Oz to enrich Australians.
The same scenario for groceries which cost $10,000 more a year for a kiwi family than our Aussie equivalents.
Kiwi Battlers' insurance costs rose an economic gravity defying 18% last year.
The blame for Kiwi Battlers' ridiculous cost of living lays squarely at the door of Mr Luxon.
Luxon promoted the dishonest, obtuse Nicola Willis to finance minister and he stands by as Willis continually lies to Kiwi Battlers to protect the aforementioned Aussie thieves.
Is this really the reputation you were hoping to achieve when you entered politics Chris?
The $10,000 a year grocery swindle requires definition .$200 weekly extra spend in NZ over Aussie is frankly unbelievable . For some families and couples $200.00 weekly spend is adequate and all the funds available. Why has this extra $200 cost of a families groceries NZ trolley being claimed .? How could it be?
Clive, my comment you may ponder what It has to do with NZ. But hopefully, my written thoughts might elaborate the thought process.
I "quote" - ' As a consequence voters are beginning to question whether this equivocation on most of the big issues confronting.... ' "end quote".
Recently America has seen a political process in New York City with 3 men running for the coveted seat as Mayor.
Of the 3 -
a. - one is a persistent candidate, who appeals to " a specific voting group, but not to the majority nor the younger generation.
b.- one has been the Governor of The State of New York, and left that office "under a cloud", but being a persistent "political pest' decided to re-try his political luck as a potential Mayor.
c.- the third is 'a no body' out of no were, who prior to and thru the campaign verbally expressed 'what he thought people needed to hear'. He was caught lying, being less than honest, implying what he said, was not what he meant.
And post election which he won >
- it has been proven, that he was financed by less than salubrious people
- the American media shown just what New Yorkers (those that voted) are now likely to face, and the "gent" is not denying it.
The other information that has come to light - is how many New Yorkers "never left" home to go and vote, those numbers are greater than those who voted.
As one US Media source noted - " As a consequence voters are beginning to question...". To paraphrase your comment.
Auckland may have problems, so do New York (and San Francisco, Los Angeles and others) that involve lack of Policing, crime statistics that are beyond manageable (if NZ thinks our Justice system is chaotic, they need to look at New York), poor waste management along streets, homelessness that is increasing, immigration levels that are an epic issue and The Democrat Party having failed from Obama to now, to be part of the management of their Country, they are currently "doing a Te Pati Maori" thingy, that is causing chaos across America.
So, yes Sir, you words have significance - and one would ask "how many Kiwi's are taking note, or are we again, focused on The All Blacks & Silver Ferns and the cricket".
Here is a clue......
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/529553/new-zealand-groceries-more-expensive-than-australia-uk-and-ireland-research
The Edith Cowan University compared the prices of some common supermarket staples in NZ and Australia but didn't include ALDI and LIDL prices in their Australian study which would obviously have made the oz NZ grocery price difference much greater..
After wasting more of our time and money on another grocery sector study (the 2022 study told the government the price colluding nz grocery duopoly needed to be monitored and punished more frequently and more harshly) the crooked Nicola Willis stood in front of the cameras to proclaim ADLI and LIDL didn't take part in her survey.
Even the obtuse Willis knows ALDI and LIDL are responsible for a substantial fall in Australian food bills but ALDI and LIDL can't get competitive access to NZs wholesale food markets unless she changes and enforces the law so there is no point in them wasting their time and money participating in her grocery sector study subterfuge.
Post a Comment