Pages

Sunday, November 16, 2025

Geoff Parker: Kiwis need to be more forthright - Silence is Surrender


For too long, New Zealanders have watched in silence as governments of all stripes have chipped away at the principle that every citizen should stand equal before the law. The steady advance of race-based governance, special rights, parallel systems, and political power granted on the basis of ancestry has gone virtually unchallenged by the everyday New Zealander. That era has to end. This country won’t fix itself, and it certainly won’t return to democratic equality if the public continues to whisper their frustrations privately while remaining silent publicly.

New Zealanders need to be far more forthright in defending a single, unified system of government. The creeping trend toward co-governance, race-specific policy, and constitutional preferences didn’t happen overnight — it happened because the public allowed politicians to trade away equal citizenship piece by piece while hoping someone else would push back. Appeasement hasn’t worked. In fact, every time a government has yielded to activist pressure, the demands have intensified. That alone should tell us that silence is not a strategy. Silence is surrender.

This is not about ordinary Māori people. They, like everyone else, want secure families, honest government, and a fair shot at success. The real issue is the machinery of race-based politics that has been built and entrenched over the past several decades. A political industry has grown around the idea that different ancestry entitles people to different political influence. That philosophy is fundamentally incompatible with democratic equality. And yet it has been permitted to take root because too few New Zealanders were willing to call it out plainly.

The result? Increasing pressure for co-governance in public services, separate representation mechanisms, race-based consultation rights, and, most concerning of all, attempts to reinterpret — or even rewrite — constitutional arrangements through the back door. These pressures will not subside on their own. They will only stop when the wider public stops tolerating them.

New Zealanders must rediscover the courage to speak openly. Not in coded language, not in apologetic whispers, but directly and without fear. We must insist that all public authority — Parliament, local government, the courts, and every ministry — serves the entire public, equally and without favour. New Zealand cannot function as a modern democracy if political rights depend on who your ancestors were. That path leads only to division, resentment, and permanent political instability.

Being forthright means demanding that politicians stop making decisions based on which group can mount the loudest accusation of historical grievance. It means rejecting any proposal that divides the country into hereditary categories. It means telling every political party, without ambiguity, that race-based governance has no place in the future of this nation.

It also means refusing to be intimidated by claims that defending equal citizenship is somehow “racist” or “colonial.” That accusation has been used for years to silence debate, and far too many people have fallen for it. Standing for civic equality is not extremist — it is the foundation of Western democracy. Every liberal society is built on the idea that the law applies equally to all. New Zealanders who defend that principle are not the problem; they are the last line of defence against a system that would permanently fracture our country.

The time for polite avoidance has passed. Ordinary New Zealanders — workers, small business owners, retirees, parents — must begin saying clearly that the future of this nation will not be carved up according to ancestral lines. If we want a country that treats every citizen fairly, then we need to push back, boldly and consistently, against any attempt to entrench racial preference in governance.

New Zealand belongs to all of us. And it is up to all of us to speak up, stand firm, and ensure that our democracy remains grounded in one timeless principle: one people, one law, one standard for every citizen of this nation.

Geoff Parker is a passionate advocate for equal rights and a colour blind society.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

More NZ citizen distracting racist clap trap.

Mr Parker doesn't give one example of cogovernance or any other Maori favoritism instigated by the coalition government.

Meanwhile NZs:
- ballooning deficit and debt,
- extremely poorly managed finances,
- untouched bloated government staff numbera,
- unnecessary and suspicious government grants to special interest groups,
- strangely protected, price colluding aussie banks, insurance companies, and supermarkets continuing to increase prices whilst kiwi businesses fail in droves,
- record numbers fleeing NZ;
- failure of the NZ government to attract the foreign investment they are seeking (what company would come to nz to pay nefariously elevated energy prices?)

All remain unmentioned!

Mr. Sandy Fontwit said...

To The coward who always hides behind "Anonymous" and always has the same inane rant that the Maorification of NZ is not a problem and any attempt to call it is out is just diverting attention of the REAL problem which is greedy corporations. 1) You have NO idea how economics works, and 2) You are completely blind to the on-going take-over of NZ by greedy wealthy elite trace-Maori CORPORATIONS (Iwi) which get HUGE amounts of free taxpayer money AND get all kinds of tax breaks that normal corporations do not get.

anonymous said...

Anon at 7.24, With respect, the author is addressing a key underlying cause of the problems stated in your "economy-driven" checklist. Examples:

no 1 ballooning debt: stopping the never -ending Treaty settlements would save billions - as would asking the super -wealthy Iwi to take charge of social benefits to persons of Maori ancestry;

no 4: suspicious grants to special interest groups. Why so much funding for kapa haka? The " booming" Maori economy could easily sponsor this cultural issue;

no 6: record departure numbers. Varius reasons exist for this disturbing trend - but the issue routinely ignored by the media and Left-leaning "academic experts" that that many people - of all ages - see no future in a 2- tier ethnocratic society. Otago University's entry to Medicine and Dentistry ( based on equity not concrete academic results) exemplifies this problem.

So, looking behind your accurate "economic" checklist, deteriorating inequality in NZ society is undoubtedly a major root social cause - simply, the strategy is to make no mention of this.is not mentioned. Worldwide , numerous countries with these race-based problems are unable to develop thriving economies - because their societies are mired in race-based conflicts.

NZ' s is running out of time to avoid this tragic outcome.

Doug Longmire said...

Thanks, Sandy. You said it for me !!

Doug Longmire said...

Excellent article, Geoff.
All this divisive racist nonsense started in the 1980's and ha pushed it's way into all aspects of our our society.
Truly - New Zealand society is a prime example of the slow boiled Frog syndrome. Softly, softly, catchee monkey !!

mudbayripper said...

Thank you Sandy and thank you Geoff. No economy can operate successfully within a devided society.

Hugh Jorgan said...

Well said, Mr Fontwit.

Geoff Parker said...

@Anonymous 7.24am - Comprehension not your strong point then? - nowhere in the article was the Coalition Gov’t singled out, in fact the very first sentence says > ”...as governments of ALL stripes have chipped away....”

As for examples of Co-Governance:

Waikato River Authority
The board is 50/50: five iwi-appointed members and five Crown-appointed members.

Te Urewera (formerly Te Urewera National Park)
Governance is by a Board with both Tūhoe representatives and Crown representatives.
ngaituhoe.iwi.nz
Initially, the board had 4 Crown and 4 Tūhoe members; after three years, it shifts to 3 Crown and 6 Tūhoe.

Whanganui River / Te Awa Tupua
Governance includes a co-governance strategy group called Te Kōpuka, made up of iwi, central & local government, environmental and recreational stakeholders.

Tūpuna Maunga (Auckland Volcanic Cones)
The Authority is jointly made up of mana whenua (local Māori) and Auckland Council members (plus a non-voting Crown rep).

Maungatautari Ecological Island Trust
Its board includes mana whenua (Māori), landowners, and wider community members, and they co-manage the ecological island reserve.

*********************

And examples of “other Maori favoritism”

* Maori-only schools,

* Special Maori content in the education curriculum,

* Maori-only education scholarships,

* Maori-only housing projects,

* Maori-only health initiatives,

* Maori-only welfare initiatives,

* Maori-only prisoner programmes,

* Maori-only positions on government agencies,

* Maori-only consultation rights under the Resource Management Act,

* Maori-only co-management of parks, rivers, lakes, and the coastline,

* Maori-only ownership rights to the foreshore and seabed,

* A special Maori Authority tax rate of 17.5 percent,

* A special Maori-only exemption to allow blood relatives to qualify for charitable status,

* Maori language funding,

* Maori radio and TV,

* Maori-only seats on local councils,

* Maori-only appointments onto local government committees,

* Maori-only local government Statutory Boards,

* Maori-only local government advisory committees,

* Maori seats in Parliament,

I rest my case :)

Anonymous said...

Once again, Mr Fontwit, doesn't give one example of cogovernance or any other Maori favoritism instigated by the coalition government (Finace Minister Willis' suspicious $48m gift to kapa haka is the exception).

Meanwhile in the world of facts and truth...

Dr David Wilson, NZ First MP gives an excellent speech on the illegal Aussie owned, NZ banking cartel.

Aussie banks stole $8b excess profits from struggling Kiwis this year!

Think about that number when you're feeling outraged at the NZ taxpayer distracting Maori bashing articles. Minister Willis has budgeted a mere $500m for addressing Maori issues this year!

Geoff Parker said...

Funding for Maori IS REPEATED EVERY YEAR and is at least $1.16-billion, and is on top of other funding distributed through Health, Housing, Social Development, and Education.
https://sites.google.com/site/treaty4dummies/home/race-based-funding-cost

That was published in 2012 - 2013, so that is 12 years that we know of, of at least $1-billion = $12-billion

Then on top of that there is all the dodgy Claims settlements that in March 2024 = $4.6billion, all listed here > https://sites.google.com/site/treaty4dummies/home/treaty-settlements-list

Geoff Parker said...

As for your "Maori bashing" inference - Fair minded New Zealanders do not "Maori bash". They simply fight for democracy and to oppose all forms of racism in New Zealand and the fake history of our country on which so much of it (racism) is based.

Geoff Parker said...

Anonymous @7.24am & 9.16am tries to downplay the Maori takeover of NZ - but noted public figures like Winston Peters and Don Brash acknowledge it > A discussion between Don Brash and Winston Peters published in the NZ Listener around 2017 - the MAORI PREFERENCE HAS ESCALATED SINCE THEN.

“After I had finished my testimony, I left the committee room. Mr Peters followed me out and suggested coffee. I said, "you know Winston, this racial preference thing is the MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE facing the Government right now". He corrected me: "No," he said, "it's the MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE facing the country right now." I believe he meant it.”