After 14 years of advocating for New Zealanders’ rights and “people power”, the NZ Outdoors & Freedom Party is entering a new era and has streamlined its name to a single, sharp, and unmistakable name: ‘freedom’.
The rebrand marks a strategic pivot toward a fundamental “paradigm upgrade” for New Zealand’s political system: the transition from a traditional parliamentary model to a system of Direct Democracy.
“For too long, the people of New Zealand have been sidelined by a system that treats public consultation as a toothless illusion,” says ‘freedom’ Leader Sue Grey. “We are tired of watching Wellington ignore the voices of everyday Kiwis while pushing through top-down agendas. It is time to shift power from the politicians back to the people.”
The Core Platform: Power to the People
‘freedom’s new platform is built on three pillars designed to dismantle bureaucratic overreach and restore individual sovereignty:
The Core Platform: Power to the People
‘freedom’s new platform is built on three pillars designed to dismantle bureaucratic overreach and restore individual sovereignty:
- Enshrining fundamental rights and freedoms: ‘freedom’ is calling for constitutional reform. Fundamental rights and freedoms which are currently recognized, but NOT protected by the NZ Bill of Rights Act (NZBORA), will be elevated to supreme law. This would prevent any future government from overriding fundamental rights, such as freedom of speech, conscience, movement, bodily autonomy, and the right to refuse medical treatment
- Implementing Direct Democracy: Inspired by the Swiss model, Freedom proposes two powerful, binding mechanisms:
- Citizens’ Veto: The power for citizens to gather signatures to force a binding nationwide vote to strike down unpopular legislation.
- Citizen-Initiated Lawmaking: The power for citizens to draft and trigger referendums on new laws, bypassing the traditional parliamentary bottleneck.
- Decentralisation: freedom advocates for moving decision-making to the local level. Direct Democracy will reduce the size of the central government and will reallocate decision making and funding to local communities.
Direct Democracy will shrink the influence of traditional politicians and political parties, transitioning their role from “decision-makers” to “administrators” who carry out the will of the public.
“Career politicians won’t like Direct Democracy. That’s too bad!” says Sue Grey. “We are here to return power to the people. Once these changes are enshrined and the power is safely in your hands, our job is done.”
The Roadmap to Change
‘freedom’ has outlined a transition strategy to direct democracy.
A binding public referendum for a constitutional change to entrench our fundamental rights and freedoms and the transition of decision making to “direct democracy” to return power to the people.
“The battle lines are clear,” says Sue Grey. “We want to take power away from Wellington and return it to where it belongs: to the people of New Zealand.”
Daily Telegraph New Zealand (DTNZ) is an independent news website, first published in October 2021. - where this article was sourced.

6 comments:
Direct democracy means we would never have had women voters, or drivers. We’d never have tax, or public services, or funded schools or police or hospitals. Is this another neoliberal house-cat? Railing against the system, while being utterly dependent on it! I hope Sue gets the help she needs.
The Swiss model has always appealed to me.
Not sure, however if the average Kiwi cares enough to make it work.
Ironically. I can't see thiose who identify as Maori embracing such a concept, even if it was, historically, their fundamental social structure.
Freedom sounds good, for a change.
Ameni
Sue Grey, It is well and good , admirable to stand for parliament , however NZ needs to "Lock Labour Out" this election .
Why not discuss joining with ACT, supporting ACT, because you will get nothing done outside of the tent but a diminished parliament size is already ACT policy and I imagine your party votes would be welcome for the coalition this election.
anonymous 6.42 - I'm having a little trouble understanding where you are coming from.
Could you elaborate a bit for the plebs?
I was unaware that women can not vote or drive in Switzerland.
Or that the Swiss don't pay tax.
I seriously think that 'anonymous' comments are pointless and typically, not worth reading. How does anyone know which 'anonymous' you are, to enable them to form some sort of opinion, of what your core, personal views are?
For all we know, you are just AI generated garbage.
No bull.
Ameni
Ihprocpro, the public would never vote for things that affect them directly, such as tax. Tax is needed to pay for things like roads, the police, and hospitals. It really is that simple. Also, the public is becoming more and more disconnected from reality as we see on this very site from week to week. Voting based in incorrect information would also lead to bad outcomes. Happy days from a fellow anon - you’re anonymous as well, from the looks!
Still don't get it 'anonymous'.
At least I have a unique handle.
One anonymous is like any other anonoymous to me.
I'll give up, lest I get another confusing reply from another 'anonymous'.
Ameni
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.