New Zealand has built a national holiday, government policy, public ceremony and classroom teaching around claims drawn from a family manuscript that the public has never been allowed to read. The claims are treated as authoritative. The source itself remains unpublished and unexamined by independent scholars.
Before this account is taught as history or astronomy, the evidence must be produced. No printed or published edition, e-book, PDF, transcription, translation, list of the alleged 1,000 star names, or list of the alleged 103 constellations has been released. We have been given Rangi Mātāmua’s interpretation of the manuscript, but not the manuscript itself.
The foundation story
The modern account frequently begins with the claim that East Polynesian people deliberately migrated to New Zealand and navigated here using the stars. That is presented as history, but there is no contemporary evidence identifying a planned migration, an intended New Zealand destination, the route taken, or a documented navigational description of the heavens used to reach New Zealand.
Archaeological evidence places people of East Polynesian origin in New Zealand by around 1300 CE. That proves presence. It does not prove the modern story constructed around how they arrived.
Where is the physical evidence?
Māori did not have a written language before European contact. But an extensive and distinct description of the heavens could still have left physical traces in carvings, rock markings, woven designs, clay objects or repeated visual patterns. No securely dated pre-European star chart, constellation map, navigational diagram or identifiable representation of the claimed 1,000 stars and 103 constellations has been produced.
Where are the carvings of identifiable star groups? Where are the rock drawings of constellations? Where are the woven star maps? Where is the physical representation of the claimed navigational knowledge?
A documented chronology
1642 — Abel Tasman reaches New Zealand
In December 1642 Abel Tasman led the first European expedition known to have reached New Zealand. His voyage left a written journal, recorded dates, observations, geographical descriptions and a cartographic record. The alleged Matariki manuscript was reportedly begun 256 years later.
1769–1770 — James Cook charts New Zealand
James Cook reached New Zealand in October 1769, circumnavigated the principal islands and produced extensive charts, journals, observations and measurements. His expedition used documented European navigational and surveying methods, including astronomical observations, sextants, quadrants, the Nautical Almanac, lunar-distance calculations, dead reckoning and coastal bearings. The alleged manuscript was reportedly begun 129 years later.
Nineteenth century — navigation, surveying and shipping
Throughout the nineteenth century, naval, migrant and commercial vessels travelled regularly to New Zealand using compasses, sextants, chronometers, nautical almanacs, astronomical observations, charts and latitude and longitude calculations. Surveyors, teachers, missionaries, engineers and scientists brought books, instruments and scientific knowledge into the country.
Throughout the nineteenth century, naval, migrant and commercial vessels travelled regularly to New Zealand using compasses, sextants, chronometers, nautical almanacs, astronomical observations, charts and latitude and longitude calculations. Surveyors, teachers, missionaries, engineers and scientists brought books, instruments and scientific knowledge into the country.
Circa 1867 — Carkeek Observatory
Stephen Carkeek built a private astronomical observatory near Featherston around 1867. Heritage New Zealand describes it as New Zealand’s earliest surviving astronomical observatory. It was built approximately 31 years before the alleged manuscript was begun.
Stephen Carkeek built a private astronomical observatory near Featherston around 1867. Heritage New Zealand describes it as New Zealand’s earliest surviving astronomical observatory. It was built approximately 31 years before the alleged manuscript was begun.
1868–1869 — standard time and the Colonial Observatory
Astronomical observation was used to establish and distribute accurate time in New Zealand. The Government’s Colonial Observatory operated in Wellington from 1869. Astronomy had become part of official infrastructure for timekeeping, navigation, surveying and mapping.
Astronomical observation was used to establish and distribute accurate time in New Zealand. The Government’s Colonial Observatory operated in Wellington from 1869. Astronomy had become part of official infrastructure for timekeeping, navigation, surveying and mapping.
1874 — university science
University-level science teaching was established at Canterbury College in the 1870s. Alexander Bickerton became its founding professor of chemistry and physics and taught physics from 1874. His later work included stars, novae, celestial collisions and the formation of solar systems. The cautious and defensible claim is that physics, mathematics and astronomical theory were being taught and discussed in New Zealand’s university system from the 1870s.
University-level science teaching was established at Canterbury College in the 1870s. Alexander Bickerton became its founding professor of chemistry and physics and taught physics from 1874. His later work included stars, novae, celestial collisions and the formation of solar systems. The cautious and defensible claim is that physics, mathematics and astronomical theory were being taught and discussed in New Zealand’s university system from the 1870s.
1874 and 1882 — transits of Venus
New Zealand hosted or participated in international observations of the transits of Venus in 1874 and 1882. These programmes required telescopes, precision timing, trained observers, astronomical calculation and international scientific cooperation.
New Zealand hosted or participated in international observations of the transits of Venus in 1874 and 1882. These programmes required telescopes, precision timing, trained observers, astronomical calculation and international scientific cooperation.
1898 — the family manuscript is reportedly begun
Public accounts say Te Kōkau Himiona Te Pikikōtuku and his son Rāwiri Te Kōkau began compiling the manuscript in 1898. Rangi Mātāmua has described it as “400 pages of longhand written in te reo Māori.” Longhand means handwriting. The manuscript was therefore reportedly begun after observatories, government astronomical timekeeping, university science, transit-of-Venus observations, surveying, shipping and generations of celestial navigation were already established in New Zealand.
Public accounts say Te Kōkau Himiona Te Pikikōtuku and his son Rāwiri Te Kōkau began compiling the manuscript in 1898. Rangi Mātāmua has described it as “400 pages of longhand written in te reo Māori.” Longhand means handwriting. The manuscript was therefore reportedly begun after observatories, government astronomical timekeeping, university science, transit-of-Venus observations, surveying, shipping and generations of celestial navigation were already established in New Zealand.
1898–1933 — thirty-five years of compilation
The manuscript was reportedly compiled over approximately 35 years. Four hundred pages of longhand handwriting equate, on the estimate used here, to approximately 100 pages of modern typed script. Claims associated with those approximately 100 typed pages include around 1,000 star names, 103 constellations, narratives, seasonal knowledge, ecological knowledge and ritual or spiritual material. Without publication, nobody outside the custodial circle can determine how much is list, explanation, repetition, interpretation, borrowing, translation or later addition.
The manuscript was reportedly compiled over approximately 35 years. Four hundred pages of longhand handwriting equate, on the estimate used here, to approximately 100 pages of modern typed script. Claims associated with those approximately 100 typed pages include around 1,000 star names, 103 constellations, narratives, seasonal knowledge, ecological knowledge and ritual or spiritual material. Without publication, nobody outside the custodial circle can determine how much is list, explanation, repetition, interpretation, borrowing, translation or later addition.
1933 — the manuscript is reportedly completed
A document written between 1898 and 1933 may contain older oral material, but the date on which a claim was written down does not establish the age of that claim. Paper, ink, handwriting, terminology, corrections, insertions and identifiable borrowings could all be examined if the manuscript were made available.
A document written between 1898 and 1933 may contain older oral material, but the date on which a claim was written down does not establish the age of that claim. Paper, ink, handwriting, terminology, corrections, insertions and identifiable borrowings could all be examined if the manuscript were made available.
1995 — Mātāmua reportedly receives the manuscript
Mātāmua says his grandfather retrieved the manuscript from a cupboard and gave it to him in 1995 while he was an undergraduate. No printed or published edition, e-book, PDF, transcription, translation, provenance report or complete catalogue of the alleged stars and constellations has been made publicly available.
2014 — Marsden Fund grant
A Marsden Fund grant of $710,000 supported the project Te Mauria Whiritoi: The Sky as a Cultural Resource — Māori Astronomy, Ritual and Ecological Knowledge. The grant was administered as a university research project and should not be described as a personal payment, but it establishes substantial public support for the research programme.
2017 — THE “EXPERT” BEGINS TO REPLACE “PEER REVIEW”
Huia Publishers released Mātāmua’s book Matariki: The Star of the Year. The public received his interpretation of the family manuscript, but not the manuscript itself. The same year also marked the beginning of the Ardern Government. From this period onward, New Zealand public life increasingly elevated the approved “expert” above the older discipline of open challenge, independent verification and “peer review.” By 2020, Jacinda Ardern was publicly using the expression ““single source of truth”.”
Huia Publishers released Mātāmua’s book Matariki: The Star of the Year. The public received his interpretation of the family manuscript, but not the manuscript itself. The same year also marked the beginning of the Ardern Government. From this period onward, New Zealand public life increasingly elevated the approved “expert” above the older discipline of open challenge, independent verification and “peer review.” By 2020, Jacinda Ardern was publicly using the expression ““single source of truth”.”
2020 — Prime Minister’s Science Communication Prize
Mātāmua received the Prime Minister’s Science Communication Prize, valued at $100,000.
Mātāmua received the Prime Minister’s Science Communication Prize, valued at $100,000.
2021–2022 — Matariki Advisory Group
Mātāmua chaired the Government’s Matariki Advisory Group, which advised on the establishment, timing, themes and official presentation of the public holiday.
Mātāmua chaired the Government’s Matariki Advisory Group, which advised on the establishment, timing, themes and official presentation of the public holiday.
2022 — Matariki becomes a public holiday
The Ardern Government established Matariki as a national public holiday. Educational resources were distributed to early-learning services, schools and kura, embedding the modern narrative in education.
The Ardern Government established Matariki as a national public holiday. Educational resources were distributed to early-learning services, schools and kura, embedding the modern narrative in education.
2022–2023 — Chief Adviser, Mātauranga Matariki
Official government material identified Mātāmua as Chief Adviser — Mātauranga Matariki. By this stage his interpretation had received university support, public research funding, commercial publication, a Prime Minister’s prize, government advisory influence and nationwide educational distribution, while the complete manuscript remained unpublished.
Where is the “peer review” of the source?
There may be academic articles that discuss Mātāmua’s work, cite his book or repeat claims attributed to the family manuscript. That is not “peer review” of the source. A review of Mātāmua’s published book is not an examination of the manuscript. A paper that cites Mātāmua is not independent verification of the manuscript. Repetition is not corroboration.
· Who outside the custodial circle has read the complete manuscript?
· Where is the independent transcription?
· Where is the second translation?
· Where is the examination of its authorship, handwriting, paper, ink, dates and provenance?
· Where is the comparison with astronomical books, charts and terminology already circulating in New Zealand between 1898 and 1933?
· Where is the independent astronomer who checked the alleged 1,000 star names and 103 constellations against the sky?
· Where is the published “peer review” establishing that the manuscript contains what is claimed for it?
Two “single sources of truth”
Rangi Mātāmua has effectively been installed as the cultural “single source of truth” for the new state-sponsored civic religion of Matariki. His interpretation is cited by government, repeated by universities, embedded in school resources and promoted through publicly funded institutions, while the manuscript said to support that authority remains unavailable for independent examination.
Jacinda Ardern became the political “single source of truth” for the Government’s state orthodoxy. Mātāmua became the cultural “single source of truth” for Matariki. In both cases, the approved “expert” displaced “peer review”: institutional authority became a substitute for evidence being openly examined, tested and challenged by other qualified people.
This is a closed circle. Mātāmua interprets an unpublished manuscript; institutions endorse Mātāmua; and that institutional endorsement is then treated as confirmation of his interpretation. That is not “peer review.” It is institutional repetition.
Are we replacing astronomy with a national myth?
The danger is not that New Zealand has physically burned its astronomical record. The danger is quieter: established astronomy can be pushed aside, culturally repackaged, or confused with religious and spiritual stories in the curriculum.
Matariki is the Pleiades, an open star cluster observed and studied by many civilisations. The stars are not gods and do not control food, weather, health, death or human wishes. Those claims belong to religion or cultural story, not empirical astronomy.
Children should be taught what stars are, why they appear to move, how seasons arise, how gravity governs orbits, how distance is measured, and how conclusions are tested. Cultural stories may be discussed, but they should be identified as stories and beliefs rather than presented as equivalent to measured science.
Is this how knowledge is erased?
History can be altered not only by destroying books and buildings, but by deciding which evidence is recognised, which questions may be asked, and which account is repeated through schools, universities, museums and government institutions.
The author sees a parallel with disputes surrounding Tartaria: historic maps, books, photographs and monumental structures are treated by many researchers as evidence that the conventional account is incomplete. Whether readers accept that interpretation or not, the broader question remains legitimate: what happens when institutions dismiss inconvenient evidence while promoting an officially preferred story?
In New Zealand, a modern Matariki account is now repeated through government and education while the central manuscript remains unavailable for independent examination. This is how an interpretation can harden into public history: one classroom resource, one government programme and one Matariki book at a time.
What publication would allow
Publication would allow independent linguists, historians, astronomers and manuscript specialists to examine the actual source rather than merely review claims made about it.
· Publish the manuscript as a printed edition, e-book and downloadable PDF.
· Publish a diplomatic transcription preserving spelling and page order.
· Publish a complete English translation.
· Identify each handwriting hand and each later insertion.
· Provide paper, ink and provenance analysis.
· Publish the complete star and constellation catalogue.
· Identify parallels with European and Pacific astronomical sources.
· Distinguish original wording from modern interpretation.
Conclusion: This is not “peer review”
The manuscript was reportedly compiled between 1898 and 1933, long after European navigation, observatory-based astronomy, surveying, scientific publishing and university science were established in New Zealand. Yet claims drawn from it have been granted national authority without publication of the source and without any publicly demonstrated independent examination of its contents.
One would have to abandon ordinary standards of evidence to accept this arrangement as scholarship. An unpublished family manuscript, interpreted by the person whose career and public authority rest upon it, cannot become established history merely because government departments, universities and schools repeat the interpretation. The “expert” is not a replacement for “peer review,” and institutional endorsement is not evidence.
Until the manuscript is published as a printed edition, e-book and PDF, independently transcribed, independently translated and subjected to genuine “peer review,” its claims must not be taught to children as established history or presented as science. A national civic religion has been built around a “single source of truth” whose central source has never been opened to public scrutiny.
Judy Gill BSc, DipTchg, is a parent, former teacher, and a staunch advocate for secular education.
References and source links
1. Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga — Carkeek Observatory, List No. 9808
https://www.heritage.org.nz/list-details/9808/Carkeek%20Observatory
2. Te Ara — Astronomy (historical overview)
https://teara.govt.nz/en/1966/astronomy
3. New Zealand History — Early meetings between peoples / Abel Tasman
https://nzhistory.govt.nz/page/early-meetings-between-peoples
4. New Zealand History — European voyaging and discovery
https://nzhistory.govt.nz/page/european-voyaging-and-discovery
5. University of Canterbury archival material — Alexander Bickerton
https://archives.canterburystories.nz/agents/people/226
6. Royal Society Te Apārangi / Marsden Fund — project and public material relating to Māori astronomy
https://www.royalsociety.org.nz/what-we-do/funds-and-opportunities/marsden/
7. Huia Publishers — Matariki: The Star of the Year
https://huia.co.nz/products/matariki-the-star-of-the-year
8. Prime Minister’s Science Prizes — Rangi Mātāmua
https://www.pmscienceprizes.org.nz/
9. Beehive — Prime Minister’s Matariki speech, 2022
https://www.beehive.govt.nz/speech/prime-minister%E2%80%99s-matariki-speech-2022
10. Beehive — New Matariki resources available for schools and kura
https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/new-matariki-resources-available-schools-and-kura
11. Beehive — Matariki legislation and advisory-group material
https://www.beehive.govt.nz/speech/te-pire-m%C5%8D-te-hararei-t%C5%ABmatanui-o-te-k%C4%81hui-o-matariki
12. Ministry for Culture and Heritage briefing material referring to Chief Adviser — Mātauranga Matariki
https://www.beehive.govt.nz/sites/default/files/2023-03/BIM%20-%20Assoc.%20Minister%20for%20Arts%2C%20Culture%20and%20Heritage.pdf
13. NZQA — Earth and Space Science
https://www2.nzqa.govt.nz/ncea/subjects/select-subject/earth-and-space-science/
14. Papers Past — historical discussion of purapura-whetū / star-related tukutuku motifs
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/
15. Te Ara — Māori star compass (modern explanatory diagram)
https://teara.govt.nz/en/diagram/2222/maori-star-compass
16. Te Ara — Māori carving
https://teara.govt.nz/en/whakairo-maori-carving
17. Te Ara — When was New Zealand first settled?
https://teara.govt.nz/en/when-was-new-zealand-first-settled/print
10 comments:
The old saying comes to mind, never let the truth get in way of a good story , especially one that pays so well and keeps giving ( taxpayers money ) Thankyou for your research , are we going to get any official response ?
Indeed, indeed....
I inherited a book titled 'Myths and Legends of Maoriland' which was published in 1946 by A.W. Reed and it has a chapter called 'The Little Eyes' which deals with what is referred to in the book as Pleiades.
It explains they are the left eyes of seven great chiefs or Matariki (little eyes that men love). Clearly this doesn't back up the presentist narrative as the stars are not actually 'revered', they have little real spiritual meaning and their relevance to Maori begins and ends with how they came to be in the sky rather than the premise put to us today.
It is quite sad that such a wonderful myth has been both politicised and monetised by the folk that promoted it to be something that it is not.
In fact, from the book, it is Ra Ririki, the Children of Light or little suns (as in all the stars) that were used to plant or navigate etc. The fact that the myth never includes mention of any calendar, new year or any other thing we are presented with today is clear.
I am not saying Matariki is unworthy of the apparent 'reverence' we are required to accept but it is some of the purest presentist gaslit narrative we have seen. It is in fact the sale of a bill of goods that is a false representation of how actually relevant from the past it was. Sadder still is New Zealanders have been suckered and we paid for the con as well. Truth is a wonderful thing and the celebration of Matariki could have been done without seeming being lied about, cajoled and contrived and that is the problem NZ has.
Rangi Matamua admits that he struggled to translate the document.
It is essential that others independently check the manuscript if Matamua's desire to "share knowledge" is genuine.
https://newsroom.co.nz/2021/02/23/the-lost-scrolls-of-matariki/
The account above is another example of how George Orwell's prescience and imagination in his '1984' have been proved correct. The Ministry of Truth being anything but, and re-writing history to reflect what 'Big Brother' requires as 'truth', except we had 'Big Sister'. This not only applies to the fabrication described above, but also to large swathes of 'remembered' maori history which expunges the awful truth of a people that had, and produced, so little but now stand poised to steal our history and products of our industry from us by lies, cunning and obfuscation.
Thank you so much Judy. We have been wondering how this rubbish has been foisted on NZ with so little authenticity. It is another example of the vacuous brain of Jacinda Ardern who was been the vehicle of delivery.
Imagine if we ever had a Prime Minister who could make a captain's call and cancel the whole shebang. There might be a hikoi but I don't think it's even that important.
Thank you, Judy, for bringing this to the public's attention.
Given prior that prior encounters with Europeans the Maori language was never written; that excluding its dialectal differences, the vocabulary was in the low tens of thousands or words and very likely a fraction of that in everyday use and understanding to the common individual; that they had no known scientific instruments (much less a wheel) and very limited means of recording such information, and that any relaying of it was essentially limited to verbal communication, it surely is absurd to suggest that they had anything like a 1,000 names for the stars and constellations and they could individually identify such. It's even less plausible than the claim that they had travelled to Antarctica. Either way, this nonsense has no place other than in mythology - alongside the taniwah and the likes of the European Santa Claus.
School and teaching time are valuable and there are vastly more important things for children to learn than this unsubstantiated poppycock which, in this instance, emanates from a stone age culture that could hardly be considered neither successful, nor civilised.
Rangi Matamua once wrote that the 400-page ledger was obtained by his great grandparent from Elsdon Best.
Matamua also states that it took him 10 years to decipher and understand the manuscript as the level of te Reo it was written in was beyond his comprehension.
With such an admission, it is surely time the manuscript was independently read and translated.
Compare this with the official dismissal of Doutre's work on the Littlewood document (draft of the TOW. Well researched, evidentiary based yet dismissed as nonsensd - unlike the myth around Matariki.
One might reasonably ask
'If you don't know where you are going to, how can you use navigation'?
Ameni
He obviously won't release the "book" as then the gravy train might dry up. That people fall for this nonsense amazes me. It reminds me of Joseph Smith the inventor of the Mormon church. He dug up gold tablets with the so called words of God on them but only he could translate them. Very convenient. Andrew
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.