Their concern is about the growth in people who are on a benefit because they are too sick to work.
Readers here will remember the distinct Sickness and Invalid's benefits that were abolished in 2013.
They were replaced with Job Seeker/Health or Disability condition (usually temporary) and Supported Living Payment (usually permanent).
Numbers on these benefits have grown. Particularly for those who are dependent for the primary reason of psychiatric or psychological conditions.
Below is my chart from MSD data:
Click to view
The Job Seeker/ Health or Disability condition numbers (dark green line) have increased significantly. It's also clear that the proportion being granted that benefit for psychological or psychiatric reasons (turquoise line) is supporting the growth (which is well above natural population growth.)
ACT's policy is, "All health and disability benefits will be independently issued by an MSD-approved pool of designated doctors."
Many GPs will be relieved at the prospect. Doctors come under a great deal of pressure to sign patients onto a benefit. Seymour talks openly about this and I've heard directly and anecdotally that GPs feel threatened and have for a long time.
At the same time, there are genuine cases whose benefit income remains secure.
But nobody can look at the evidence and deny a problem. Too many are languishing on benefits when the best thing for their mental health would be a job: a purpose, companionship and more money.
Numbers on these benefits have grown. Particularly for those who are dependent for the primary reason of psychiatric or psychological conditions.
Below is my chart from MSD data:
Click to view
The Job Seeker/ Health or Disability condition numbers (dark green line) have increased significantly. It's also clear that the proportion being granted that benefit for psychological or psychiatric reasons (turquoise line) is supporting the growth (which is well above natural population growth.)
ACT's policy is, "All health and disability benefits will be independently issued by an MSD-approved pool of designated doctors."
Many GPs will be relieved at the prospect. Doctors come under a great deal of pressure to sign patients onto a benefit. Seymour talks openly about this and I've heard directly and anecdotally that GPs feel threatened and have for a long time.
At the same time, there are genuine cases whose benefit income remains secure.
But nobody can look at the evidence and deny a problem. Too many are languishing on benefits when the best thing for their mental health would be a job: a purpose, companionship and more money.
Disclaimer: I have had no direct involvement with ACT party policy.
Lindsay Mitchell is a welfare commentator. This article was sourced HERE
5 comments:
Currently over 14% of working age Kiwis aren’t working, they are on a benefit. This figure increases by 0.5% per year. Many economists postulate that once it exceeeds 20%, the weight of dependency causes societal collapse. Looking forward to 2040 anyone?
Funny angle from Seymour who has been on public purse aka welfare for a decade now. Welfare for me but not for others!
I'm really happy working hard today so that others can sit on their arses on a beautiful day.
They need that so that they can recover from the trauma of potty training.
Yeah right.
If the benefit was paid monthly instead of fortnightly it would teach some budgeting skills. .
If the benefit was doubled to a 4 weeks benefit payment and paid monthly, it would mean 12 payments a year .
Yes , the beneficiary would get less over a year but the NZ INC would have a reduction in cost of providing the benefit of 8.5% to be put towards debt reduction.
Then beneficiaries would be assisting NZ.
Anon 10-53. Whilst most of your obvious idols in the Opposition Parties would qualify as being on the Welfare Public Purse, David Seymour actually works hard for his salary
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.