Showing posts with label International Criminal Court. Show all posts
Showing posts with label International Criminal Court. Show all posts
Sunday, November 24, 2024
Brendan O'Neill: Making it a crime for the Jews to defend themselves
Labels: Brendan O'Neill, International Criminal Court, Israel Hamas conflict, Moral disarray of the WestThe ICC’s issuing of arrest warrants for Israeli leaders is a vile act of moral inversion.
Let’s speak plainly about what happened yesterday. Four hundred and eleven days after the Jews were subjected to the worst act of anti-Semitic barbarism since the Holocaust, arrest warrants were issued for the Jews who fought back. Thirteen months after Israel was invaded by the racist killers of Hamas, indictments were made against the men who pursued those racist killers. A little over a year since a species of fascism was visited on the world’s only Jewish nation, the Jewish nation’s own leaders found themselves turned into fugitives for the ‘crime’ of fighting that fascism.
Saturday, November 23, 2024
Perspective with Heather du Plessis-Allan: It's a really tough time to be the UN
Labels: Benjamin Netanyahu, Heather du Plessis-Allan, International Criminal Court, United NationsTell you what, it’s a tough time to be the UN.
I can’t help but feel that the UN’s credibility is increasingly on the line at the moment with how often it’s being ignored.
Take for example what’s just happened overnight: the International Criminal Court – which was set up through the UN and endorsed by the UN's General Assembly – has issued an arrest warrant for the Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu.
Friday, November 30, 2012
Ron Smith: Terrorist rules
Labels: Hamas, humanitarian law, International Criminal Court, Israel, Palestinian Authority, Ron Smith, TerrorismA commentator on my previous posting (of 19 November) explicitly makes the argument anticipated but dismissed there, that weaker parties in these irregular wars will tend to see themselves as not bound by humanitarian law. He says: “Having and obeying the rules of warfare tends to be something that only the strong can do. Without supporting one side or the other it is obvious that Hamas or the PLO is not militarily able to take on the IDF in the open. To do so would be suicidal. Were I a freedom fighter (which in their eyes they are) I’d use the means I had available and stuff the rules.” (emphasis added).
It is easy to understand the sentiment that lies
behind this kind of observation, and the commentator is right to observe that
Hamas cannot take on the Israeli Defence Forces in conventional conflict, with
any prospect of success. But it is a long way from this observation
to justifying killing arbitrary Israeli citizens (not members of the military
forces), which is the dominant Hamas tactic. This, as noted earlier,
is simply terrorism and has been universally condemned (in United Nations
resolutions, international conventions and humanitarian law) and it doesn’t
matter whose ‘eyes’ we are using.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


