How bad?
Well, here’s the WHO explaining when sex education starts:
"From birth, babies learn the value and pleasure of bodily contact, warmth and intimacy … From birth, parents in particular send messages to their children that relate to the human body and intimacy. In other words, they are engaging in sexuality education."
According to the WHO bathing your baby is educating them about sex. The WHO deliberately conflates caring for a baby and teaching sex.
The UN does similar:
"Young people are sexual beings. All young people should be able to explore, experience and express their sexualities in healthy, positive, pleasurable and safe ways. This can only happen when young people’s sexual rights are understood, recognised and guaranteed."
Not young adults. Young people. How old is a young person? Well, any age actually. The UN deliberately blurs the age at which children are to be sexualised. For example, twelve-year-olds are young people.
Indeed, parents now note that pupils in New Zealand are increasingly described by their schools and teachers as “young people”.
According to the UN, twelve year olds and younger are sexual beings with sexual rights who should be able to explore, experience and express their sexualities in healthy, positive, pleasurable and safe ways.
The UN and WHO statements align perfectly with the advocates for paedophilia. There’s a blurring of what is sexual and what is not, a blurring of age, and a focus on consent making any sex okay. To the UN and the WHO, children can consent to sex. That’s their message repeated over and over.
I take the above quotes from a critical report by Dr. Joanna Williams.
The Relationship and Sexuality Education Guidelines curriculum promoted by the Ministry of Education which is both sexualising and queering our children follows directly the UN’s International technical guidance on sexuality education
It gets worse.
The UN duplicitiously ties the sexualisation and queering of children to their Sustainability Development Goals which New Zealand signed up to in 2015 as Agenda 2030.
It’s signing up to that Agenda that sees a male teacher pairing off my 13-year-old daughters’ class to practice putting condoms on wooden penises with the avowed purpose of having her protect herself when she submits to anal sex.
It’s all part and parcel of the UN’s Agenda 2030.
The Director-General of UNESCO Audrey Azoulay explains in the foreword to the UN’s Technical Guidance on Sexuality Education: “We are convinced that if we do not meet young people’s calls for good quality comprehensive sexuality education, we will not achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) we have set for 2030.”
And notice the sleight of hand: the sexualising of kids is necessary not because the UN is demanding it but supposedly because kids themselves are. Of course, kids aren’t demanding comprehensive sex education. In fact, we hear more and more that our kids are OVER IT. But more to the point, so what if they were? It is not kids who decide what is and what is not appropriate for them: that is the job of responsible adults.
Again, the sleight of hand is from the pedophile’s playbook. The kids want it. It’s the kids themselves asking to be sexualised. The UN and the WHO are just responding to the need. They are truly despicable. They blame the kids, their victims.
The queering and sexualising of New Zealand children is set to continue and to deepen on present trends.
The Right Honourable Winston Peters earlier this year affirmed New Zealand’s commitment to the Agenda 2030. This is despite his Coalition Agreement with National declaring “the removal and replacement of the gender, sexuality and relationship-based education guidelines” government policy.
The New Zealand Government is committed to the Ministry of Education’s Relationship and Sexuality Education through Agenda 2030 even while the same government is committed through the Coalition Agreement to dumping it.
It’s a necessary requirement of politics to be able to ride two horses at the same time. Mr Peters has the uncanny skill of riding two horses in completely opposite directions. It’s a skill that explains his political longevity.
Meanwhile, our children are being psychologically abused by the misnamed Health Curriculum. And next to no one knows and fewer care.
I doubt Mr Peters or Mr Luxon have a clue what they are signing up to. And I am not sure they would care even if they did.
Successful societies stand ready to sacrifice the old for the young. Through the covid years we reversed that willingness: we sacrificed the young for the old. Our children stayed home and got jabbed to save nana. That child sacrifice continues in our schools and it comes down from the UN and the WHO and through our very own government even while our political leaders promise the exact opposite.
We pride ourselves on being a sovereign nation but sex education in New Zealand is dictated from afar with our national leaders just ticking the box. I spend my time talking to my local principal and board chair. They pretend to listen. And I pretend they can do something about it.
It’s like when we vote. We think we are voting for policy. Just like our leaders think they are making policy when they sign their coalition agreements.
But the decision that counts has already been made by non-elected power brokers far away. Our political leaders simply prove their subservience.
One day it will come. One day Agenda 2030 will be ripped up for the perverted and destructive agreement that it is.
That will be the truly blessed day that we once again put our kids and our country first.
Rodney Hide is former ACT Party leader, and Minister in the National-ACT Government from 2008 to 2011. This article was first published HERE
8 comments:
Thank you Rodney for exposing what most of us have no clue about. Sexuality today is all about freedom to choose what gender one wants to assume, just as a Māori is someone who “feels” that way. The world has gone mad. Alcohol can be damaging, but generations of drug use might be an underestimated component of todays thinking, that needs to be studied.
The problem here is that if kids aren't taught about sexual matters by responsible adults, they will be 'taught' about them by peers in the school playground.
At age 11 I still didn't know how babies were made and couldn't work out what the other kids were talking about when it came to sex. A family friend took pity on me and took me along to a parents and children's gathering at which a doctor explained the wonders of human reproduction. I was horrified!
Of course nowadays knowing how babies are made is a trivial issue compared to the really important ones such as boys who are really girls and girls who are really boys.......... shudder.
The 'responsible adults' I allude to are teachers, but many of them are now radical gender activists who try to con pre-pubescents into undergoing hormone treatment with a view to blocking puberty so that the poor confused child can 'transition' eventually leading to surgical removal of perfectly healthy organs.
We need government to define, in legislation, what men/boys and women/girls are using objective criteria (karyotype accounts for the sex of over 99% of people) and restricting gender to psychological and social constructs about masculinity and femininity as defined by sex. The Min of Ed then needs to produce a curriculum on sex education that is based on the foregoing and is mandatory for all teachers to follow whatever their own views about the issues invoked.
The State has a duty of care towards its youngest members. This would be one way of exercising that duty responsibly and spiking the guns of those who would subvert our children.
The creeps slide into positions of influence under cover of darkness so to speak. Then over time they introduce their twisted agenda small bits at a time
The “cult” running the UN, WEF, WHO and others, are sick twisted perverted psychopaths who want to “normalize” pedophilia to being a “right”.
They changed its name to “minor attracted persons” to make it “less sick” and began introducing it to children throughout STATE run institutions, to accept “sick and queer” behaviour as being normal.
My introduction to sexuality wasn't too dissimilar to yours Barend.
I share your horror Rodney.
However I question your equating the use of condoms with anal sex.
Using condoms confidently and seeing them as your responsibility as a young person is vital to preventing the spread of HIV and syphilis and gonorrhoea. Not to mention chlamydia ( we have an epidemic of this) wart virus, which can blind babies in the birth canal and herpes simplex. ( equally horrifying)
None of my children were indoctrinated with the option of anal sex in their sex education at NZ state schools.
I am enormously gratefully to the mature women who took on the role of teaching my sons how to use a condom and giving my daughter the confidence to demand the use of one and making sure she knew how to buy them and what sort. All part of being a parent Rodney. Discuss discuss discuss. And allow your girls to seek further information. Be honest and if you are uncomfortable there are excellent people in our health communities who can answer all the questions. without judgement.
Personally Family Planning was a mine of information and advice.The business model used by this organisation needs to be spread far and wide.
” It’s like when we vote. We think we are voting for policy”.
Under the 1852 Constitution Act, the politicians in Wellington may have been “elected” by the NZ people, but they were elected only as “representatives” to a system set up by London and accountable directly to the Crown, not the people. Voters could change the faces, but they couldn’t change the system itself.
The fourth Labour government in 1986 decided to declare legal independence from Great Britain, and turn the New Zealand parliament into the “Crown” itself by seizing all the power and authority from Westminster and enthroning a “Queen of New Zealand”.
They did this through the Constitution Act of 1986 and the Imperial Laws Application Act of 1988. There was only one problem, it was, and remains to this day, technically illegal and unconstitutional.
The public awoke the morning after, not realising New Zealand’s parliament had just seized absolute power and enthroned itself as “the Crown”. It never went to a public vote, and ever since 1986, our parliament has governed as “supreme sovereign” and never sought ratification for that coup from the people.
Supreme power is not held by the New Zealand people. We are still “subjects” but now to a “parliamentary monarchy” in Wellington rather than to the English monarchy in England.
We are an illegal, unconstitutional monarchy where Parliament in Wellington took supreme power for itself in 1986, and that power has intoxicated politicians ever since, with ruling politicians doing whatever they liked.
We have to legally clean up the aftermath of the 1986 Coup d’Etat. The UK Government had no authority to actually transfer the Crown to the NZ Parliament, because at the midnight moment of passing the Crown to Wellington its power to do so (an act of colonialism) ceased to exist. Likewise, Lange and Palmer had no legal ability to accept the Crown in 1986 – they had to get ratification from the people first. They never did so. Australia and Canada are in the same boat.
REF- TIME TO ADDRESS NZ’S SECRET 1986 COUP D’ETAT
By Ian Wishart
I have a good idea . When a whole class of Year 8s has reached the required reading level for their age, they are given a pamphlet on sex education to take home and read if they wish.
The difference in sexual knowledge between today and 70 and more years ago is astounding. I recall a 3rd form colleague (who later became a secondary school prinipal) being totally nonplussed by the virgin story at sunday school. The Christine Keeler affair revealed a few snippets of then non missionary sexual behaviour, now known and much more, for better or worse, to all primary students. Many parents seemed not to attempt even the basic birds and bees talk. Even by the 5th form very few would have have known what homosexuality was. The mental effort now applied to matters sexual possibly explains much of falling scholastic achievement.
Post a Comment