Worse, this obsession understates, and perhaps fears, the potential of citizens to sacrifice for the greater good. It implies that people are purely self-interested economic units, rather than members of a community willing to endure hardship for shared values.
Perhaps nowhere is this distraction campaign more effectively managed than by the New Zealand National Party, which often portrays itself as the only rational, middle of the road, choice. They are followed in close second place by the media, and by polling companies, who flatly refuse to ask the right questions, or to ask these questions in ways conducive to an accurate response.
By constantly directing attention toward the national spreadsheet, they manage to ignore, or at best, treat as secondary, the fundamental restructuring of society brought about by the creeping influence of Critical Theory, not least Critical Race Theory.
We are watching a seemingly unstoppable shift in focus from individual opportunity to group identity, from meritocracy to equity-based outcomes, and from equality of opportunity to equality of results. Yet, when these issues are challenged, they are often dismissed by the political establishment as "culture wars", distractions from the "real" work of economic management.
This is a dangerous miscalculation. The "real issue" is that society is being fundamentally re-engineered in schools, public institutions, and the bureaucracy to fit a worldview that persists in categorizing citizens into either oppressed or oppressors categories, and that aims to engineer social change in ways that radically alter our bedrock traditions of fairness and order.
The National Party's approach uses pro-market rhetoric to reassure its base, while failing to act as a meaningful bulwark against institutional capture by dangerous and self-interested ideologues. By focusing almost exclusively on “tax relief” and “roads,” they often mask their complicity in, or negligence regarding, the persistence of co-governance principles, and the promotion of identity politics in government policy.
This "economy first" mantra, when weaponized to ignore cultural and ideological shifts, is a betrayal of the greater good. It suggests we can afford to lose our national unity, our tradition of a fair go, of personal responsibility, of reward for effort, of civility of discourse, and of shared endeavour.
If the "economy" continues to be the only legitimate subject of political debate, the only issue by which National chooses to be judged, we may well look up from our marginally cheaper shopping carts, to behold a country that we barely recognize, governed by principles to which we never agreed, and did not fully foresee, and to a country past winding back.
It is time for the National Government to talk openly about the things that actually matter, and to ignore, or counter, those whose sole objective is to silence those with whom they disagree.
The social contract that has delivered the fairest and most prosperous of times, for the greatest number of people, is being progressively displaced by a dystopian world in which little makes sense, where division is the perpetual engine of change, where much is expected for little sacrifice, and when those who built by the sweat of their brows are constantly denigrated.
The National Party, over many decades, has lost its way, traded off many of its core principles, and ceased to be an essential counterbalance to the left.
It has traded its mandate, and history may well, and deservedly, judge it very harshly.
If a left wing government is returned to resume its policies of division and destruction, which it may well be, National will well deserve the wrath of those whose vote they took for granted, and whose voices they ignored.
Caleb Anderson, a graduate history, economics, psychotherapy and theology, has been an educator for over thirty years, twenty as a school principal.

10 comments:
I don’t have a lot of hope in politics. NZs relative productivity continues to languish. Manufacturing is en route to complete elimination from the economy. But no political party will tackle the root cause which is lack of capital. And we know that lack of capital is related to the lack of local small scale lenders that exist in high productivity economies.
NZ will never take on the banks which shows who is really in charge. And the banks will continue their strategy of monopoly and rent extraction.
Nah, the real issue is climate, and the economy cannot run on top of a climate that doesn’t allow it to run. Mankind really has stuffed up here, the contrast between people going around the moon vs the planet turning into a greenhouse due to our actions is a helluva contrast. The culture war distraction will fade into rightful obscurity soon enough.
Absolutely agree, if there ever was a party needing to be punished at this coming election it's the National party.
Well said, Caleb. And who would ever have guessed that our most pressing issue is really the climate? Ironic that anon@7.53 should also refer to space, for Einstein was clearly right about that comparison with a human feature being infinite.
True: first society ( and its general well-being) , then the economy ( a sub- set the of the former). Climate is a lower sub-set with consequences for both society and the economy.
This used to be taught in schools - before the waiata singing and obscure cultural ceremonies took precedence.
Weep for NZ and curse the people who allowed this to happen.
For those that agree with Caleb, please do your bit and post a link to it to all National MP's - their addresses can be found here: https://www.nzcpr.com/quick-email-mps/
As the saying goes, 'the more the merrier.'
How right you are Caleb. But there will be no salvation in ‘politics as usual’. These are the very people who have driven us into the swamp of despair. They will be quite unable to get us out. A completely new approach to the government of this country is now vital. We need an end to political parties, as rotten as they now are. We need honest, rational, independent and capable people to assume the Parliamentary role.
I agree with what you say Caleb but there is one redeeming feature the National Government has done and need recognition for and that is Erica Standford's getting rid of the infernal programmes of Reading Recovery and Whole Language reading instruction which were producing devastating failure in literacy with far too many students including low decile ones and Maori and Pasifica .Also her implementation of structured instruction in primary maths is commendable. NCEA was a disaster for particularly less able students desoite supposedly helping them the most and insisting on literacy and numeracy testing at year 11 is so important .
Economists are often self centered and believe they have all the answers and the best solutions for building society.
But from my perspective as an educationalist having our children well educated is paramount for a bright future and building up society .
Marxism has brought in destructiveness in CRT and Maori culture infiltration into so many areas but that was a consequence of our rotten progressive education system selectively damaging the most disadvantaged including Maori students who genuinely were victims of ineffective teaching methods , lack of discipline and lack of content.
With the recent changes in education Maori and other low SES children will benefit among the most. Marxism is and never has been the answer. But academia are saturated with it.
Well said.
National, under John Key ably assisted Chris Finlayson certainly had a critical race theory agenda the vast majority of New Zealanders were unaware of. It was all so nicely hidden but continued on with by Labour until it began to dawn on most of us that being anything but Maori was a handicap. The WHY has never been explained. Its a government within a government, a whole other political party.
National 2023 knew all very well the discontent brewing and tuned their campaign to suit. They got it. So did ACT and NZF. But since then National have carried on Keys/Labours legacy barely giving these concerns much more than lip service, grudgingly implementing NZF 's attempts to reign in the juggernaut and openly hostile to ACT's failed Treaty Principles Bill.
Enter Christopher Luxon. If nothing else I've watched his aloofness on all sorts of things and it always seems he fears being caught out voicing his true thoughts that conflict with Nationals perceived ideals.
His silence on this issue as you say disguised behind vague economics goals also hints at a broader concern. To me he's taken up the baton of an ethno state. His silence is avoidance and it suggests deception that always goes with co-governance motives. It explains why the normally perceptive Judith Collins seems to be deaf, dumb and blind to this in every portfolio she holds. It's why Goldsmith is equally missing in action. Luxon KNOWS this state of affairs is unacceptable so he hides it. It's like the mission is to ensure democracy ends and ethno nationalistic governance succeeds.
Perhaps that's why, unpopular as he is, he clings to power, likely to take National down with him. To finish the job. Perhaps that's why he's selling his property investments. He's got that insider knowledge that they could well be worthless.
But needless to say, it's not going unnoticed any longer.
When you realize that history is written by the victors, Luxon will be liked back on as a hero.
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.