Pages

Monday, February 13, 2023

Cam Slater: The Peter Principle in the Labour Party


You may have heard of Laurence J Peter’s Peter Principle, which observes that people in a hierarchy tend to rise to “a level of respective incompetence”. Nothing epitomises the Peter Principle more than the modern state of political parties and the Labour Party in particular.

With the ascendancy of Chris Hipkins to the prime ministership, we have seen a clear-cut example of the Peter Principle in action. So too with the promotion of lacklustre ministers with a solid record of ordinary performance at best and abject failure at worst. Yet promoted they were.

Chris Hipkins was the minister in charge when this Government repeatedly broke the law in locking down and locking up its citizens, preventing us from availing ourselves of basic human rights enshrined in our Bill of Rights. MIQ was an unmitigated disaster for which there has been no apology. The vaccine rollout was draconian and inept as well as tardy and slow in comparison with other countries. The rollout of RATs was another utter failure, and the shaming and blaming of innocent parties for various outbreaks all happened on Hipkins’ watch. When he was Police Minister he saw crime run rampant, with daily ram raids, spiralling violent crime and retail crime more than doubling on his watch.

And yet, after all that failure, he rose to lead the country, after another abject failure finally realised that she too was incompetent and could no longer cover it all up with flapping arms, word salad, head tilting and frowny faces.

But perhaps the most egregious example of the Peter Principle in action is the meteoric rise of the rather oily and very ordinary Michael Wood. This is a man whose only experience in the workplace was measuring the inside seam of men buying suits at the now-defunct Hugh Wright. After rising to a position of being able to be trusted to fold suits, he then entered the hallowed halls of the union movement and started his rather long and tedious role as understudy to Phil Goff, along the way chalking up no less than 4 election losses: 2 in Pakuranga, 1 in Botany and another in Epsom.

Most recently he has been the Minister of Transport, now elevated to the front bench in the Hipkins ministry.

Andrea Vance outlines his long, long list of failures in that portfolio:
And Vance points out just how dysfunctional Wood’s department is:

Waka Kotahi, the land transport agency for which Wood is responsible, is currently one of the Government’s most problematic departments.

It is under fire because the road network is in a mess, and it can’t seem to deliver major projects on time or on budget. Even the ones it finishes have to be redone.

The agency also has a deserved reputation for being wasteful. From the $51 million squandered on the abandoned cycling and walking bridge project across Auckland’s Waitemata harbour, to the $70m-plus spent on the doomed light-rail project.

Let’s Get Wellington Moving (which WK oversees with the local authorities) has spent $83 million – $47m on consultants – and delivered only a pedestrian crossing. In EIGHT YEARS. And the walkway cost an eye-watering $2.4m.


Despite all that failure, which leaves out the failure of the Hamilton-to-Auckland slow train that no one wanted or bothered to take, Woods has been promoted. Perhaps that was left out in order to save valuable column inches…what’s another failure when there are so many others to list?

Why have these dolts – the inept, the incompetent and the lazy – risen so far up the chain? It surely can’t be because they are good at their jobs: clearly, they aren’t.

If only modern political parties believed in a meritocracy, rather than embedding an ineptocracy.

Is this proof positive that the only principle Labour has is the Peter Principle?

I think it is.

Cam Slater is a New Zealand-based blogger, best known for his role in Dirty Politics and publishing the Whale Oil Beef Hooked blog, which operated from 2005 until it closed in 2019. This article was first published HERE.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...


But..... they are safe in the knowledge that their ever loyal media will cover their disastrous tracks.

Anonymous said...

Well, I think you are right Cam. Labour have embraced the 'Peter Principle' with apparent vigour
and have truly excelled in its adoption, without any detracting mitigation.

Unknown said...

Cam. Do you recall the "rollout of MMP", an idea bred in a University. The concept was to give greater voice to Parliament with varied voices. It was designed to break the 2 Party monopoly and allow "other Players in the Arena where decision making, for the whole of NZ, would have greater viability - or something like that. We had a Referendum, the answer was YES, we had change - which led to some of the "biggest nut jobs" creating Political Parties, wasting the voters time/ to which in another referendum - The People said No (twice) to MMP. Sadly with MMP, both National & Labour created a List of who would stand in a Constituency (with a chance to win) and a list of those if bums on seats were needed, then you "brought in the friends". If you look at the Labour Party at time of John Key being elected, you will see what "friends of Labour", thought they could be MPs - many sadly lacking in both quality & ability to contest a Constituency seat, and whilst in opposition, failed to ""learn" - Jacinda was one, so to was Hipkins as well as "the (now Minister) for Auckland. You only listed Wood, what about others under Jacinda, who "failed to fire" Poto Williams the classic. As for Wood, my money says he is there to run counter check to Brown. And he is not the first Minister for Auckland, Helen Clark appointed Judith Tizzard/as Minister (outside Cabinet) for Auckland Issues [1] - 1999/2002 Assisting the PM, [2] - 2002/2007 - observed, when sitting in the House, during debates knitting.
The other interesting point - Andrea Vance, now placing written comment in a Newspaper that got money from the Govt - wow.

Ross said...

Hard not to agree Cam, but on the other side we have Luxon sleep walking to an election loss for the centre right. Something has to change and quickly.

An example. In recent days it has been highlighted that under the 3/5 Waters legislation they will be borrowing $200 billion and rate payers will carry the liability, after they have effectively had their assets stolen from them, after being built up over decades. Luxon should have known about this, but now that he is aware why isn't he "screaming from the roof tops" and taking the Government to task? Maybe because he lacks the backbone for the job.

Anonymous said...

Michael Wood referred to protesters in the grounds of Parliament as “a river of filth”. A obnoxious little man who has been promoted beyond his station in life

Anonymous said...

Wayne Brown doesn’t suffer fools. Michael Wood (MP for Auckland) will be sent back to the Beehive with his tail between his legs.