With her latest racial ranting, Te Pati Māori (Māori Party) Co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer has lowered her own abjectly low standards. Faced with a person like this, it’s hard to remain civil.
In her 14 July 2024 interview with Jack Tame, Debased Debbie described the current Government as white supremacist and genocidal towards Māori citizens of New Zealand.
You can hear salient excerpts from the interview here (the recording comes from the Hobson’s Pledge “Nazis”).
Debbie Ngarewa-Packer on Q&A - 14JUL24 | WATCH Jack Tame dismantle Debbie Ngarewa-Packer's ridiculous claims that our Government is "white supremacist". | By Hobson's PledgeFacebook | Facebook
For good measure - albeit somewhat tangentially – D N-P also told Tame that New Zealand’s current Government is complicit in a genocide in Gaza, and is also “ecocidal”. According to an “expert” panel of lawyers convened by the World Economic Forum (Klaus Schwab’s odd mob), ecocide is defined as follows:
Click to view
We mustn’t lose sight of the fact that Ngarewa-Packer wasn’t spitting her vile bile from some obscure corner of the internet, or even on Māori TV. Her Podium was our national television broadcaster, TVNZ, with no apparent apprehension on her part that she could be digging herself into any sort of kumara hole. Sticking it into her nation, smashing us right in the teeth, accusing every member and supporter of the current Government of racist genocide.
In ordinary times, one could reasonably expect powerful societal responses to Ngarewa-Packer’s startling alleged genocide of anyone with a Māori ancestor.
What might New Zealand’s Human Rights and Race Relations Commissioner, Karanina Sumeo, think of all this? Karanina has a master’s degree in “social policy” from…you guessed it…Massey University and a PHD in “public policy” from…you know it…Auckland University of Technology.
Karanina strikes me as a nice person. If she agrees with D N-P, one should expect her to come out powerfully against the Māori-genocidal Government.
Or, if perchance Debbie’s accusation that some New Zealander leaders are systematically killing Māori people is…false, we might expect the Human Rights Commission to pipe up about that. Unfortunately, it’s as if there’s some sort of secret compact between Māori and Pasifika people that they won’t criticize each other on matters of race.
What the Human Rights/Race Relations Commissioner should do, of course, is take Deborah aside and firmly invite her to tone down the race rhetoric. But that didn’t happen with Tusiata Avia, and isn’t happening with Ngarewa-Packer, Māori Party Co-Leader Rawiri Waititi, Waititi’s bonkers wife (Kiri Tamihere-Waititi, John Tamihere’s daughter) or any others in the cozy coterie of crazy race baiters. The only deathly thing is the silence.
The most mysterious thing about Our Deborah’s drivel – at least to me – is whether there’s any sincerity to her utterances that there’s a genocide against Māori (or some Māori, or some mysterious Māori “Identity”). She’s probably insincere - which I think makes it worse - but who knows? Either way, considered objectively and dispassionately, she’s deliberately trying to foment a violent race war in New Zealand, or at least acts of political violence. Mercifully, that’s unlikely, because there is of course no genocide and most Maori see what D N-P says for what it is - rancid lunacy.
But apologists abound for the sort of putrid piffle that the likes of D N-P spout. Defenders of Ngarewa-Packer come in two basic strains. (I’m excluding those who actually agree with her race-hate tripe.)
The first defender group asserts that Hate Packer is simply exercising her free speech…and what’s wrong with that – don’t you believe in free speech? This defence conflates the overall societal benefits of citizens speaking freely with the quality of any particular item of speech. But just because the concept of free speech is laudable and beneficial doesn’t of course mean that what someone says necessarily has any merit - or isn’t awful. And even the most ardent Free Speecher draws the line at speech that advocates violence, which is a line that Ngarewa-Packer is brazenly walking, with impunity. (I still favour D N-P saying whatever she wants, however distasteful and dotty.)
The second strain of Debbie Defenders claims that she’s just unappealingly appealing to her constituents and those she’s hoping to recruit into her ideological camp. Which is about as convincing as arguing that a nascent Ku Kluz Klan party in New Zealand could legitimately promote lynching of brown-skinned people, in order to appeal to any constituency harboring such dark and retrograde aspirations.
Debbie and her race rabble are big on blood purity and what it takes to be a “Proper Maori”. Te Pati Māori relentlessly blood shames Māori or others who don’t believe in their racial philosophies, particularly their advocacy for a separate Māori Nation. But the lady doth protest too much, me thinks.
Behold Celtic Debbie, before her Monetized Māori Metamorphosis.
We’re all just Mongrel Muggles. Superb former Human Rights Commissioner Hiwi Tauroa must be turning in his grave…
John McLean is a citizen typist and enthusiastic amateur who blogs at John's Substack where this article was sourced.
John McLean is a citizen typist and enthusiastic amateur who blogs at John's Substack where this article was sourced.
12 comments:
Definition: the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group.
So ask her to produce the bodies of the victims and if she cannot, then charge her with racial hatred and put her in prison for life: full unnatural life !
The Māori population reached its lowest count of 44, 000 (down from an estimated 100, 000 in 1840) around 1890..
This decline is attributed to: (1) a massive loss of breeding age females during the Musket Wars of the 1820s and 1830s; and (2) lack of initial resistance among the Māori population to introduced respiratory ailments).
Since there are now an estimated 1, 000, 000 New Zealanders with a Māori ancestor, the ‘Māori’ population has increased some 2, 272% over the 134 years since 1890.
If that’s State-sponsored ‘genocide,’ either the government isn’t very good at it or isn’t trying too hard.
The Genocide Convention defines genocide as "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group."
These five acts include killing members of the group, causing them serious bodily or mental harm, imposing living conditions intended to destroy the group, preventing births, and forcibly transferring children out of the group.
This is the definition used by the International Criminal Court. Note that mass killing is not necessarily a part of a genocidal programme.
Please don't shoot the messenger; I think it is important that we are aware of the vagaries of 'lawspeak' at the international level!
This is the same wahine that recently claimed that Maori owned the wind !
Surely that demonstrates her illogical and irrational thinking.
MSM stop giving her any oxygen.
Debbie Ngarewa-Packer can you find me some full bloodied Moriori ?
No ?
Why not ?
Because Maori slaughtered Moriori on the Chathams from 1835 and performed one of the most complete genocides the world has known.
And then blamed Pakeha !
Apparently we didn't do enough to stop it - note that this was pre 1840 and the Treaty.
Under the last Labour govt , we the taxpayers of NZ apologized to the Moriori remnants and paid them compensation. One of the worst offenses by that Government and they very quietly slipped that through Parliament.
Note that Willie Jxn said that he could not be held to be responsible for the actions of his ancestors !
One thing forgotten about the decline of the Maori race in the 19th Century was that a Maori was then defined as a person with half or more Maori ancestry. It was less a matter of people getting killed than diversification of genes.
There is no such thing as ‘international law’ just non-binding international conventions lacking an enforcement mechanism peddled by globalists to progressively [sic] undermine national sovereignty.
Laws are a function of national sovereignty and apply to those under the territorial jurisdiction of a nation state.
The woman is a fool - she does not have the capacity to reason.
Is or was her hair naturally that black?
Most normal persons dismiss her ranting but many maori are not "normal" in that, judging by school acheivements, their IQ is below average. On top of imagine decolonisation exhoratations they soak up her rantings.
If Anon 4:45 is right, it looks like I wasted a lot of money, energy and time sitting exams in international law. Granted, international courts have no enforcement mechanism. But not granted is the claim that international law seeks to undermine sovereignty. On the contrary, the principle of jus voluntarium prevails (except for a handful of instances that come under jus cogens, such as the prohibitions on slavery and piracy), and international law recognises the sovereignty of small, weak nations when being bullied by big, powerful ones.
International law is a major step towards a rules-based international order.
I initially thought she should be charged with libel, but just like Trump, it would give her a bigger soapbox to promote her drivel. TV One and Jack Tame should pull their heads in and be ashamed at this cheap trick to give her more oxygen. A waste of taxpayers money. They are acting like TV 3 before they were canned
Regarding Debbie's comments:-
The elephant in the room to me is this...
Always flip the script
If a white New Zealander had publicly made similar comments about Maori people there would have been great outrage. Cuddles Coster would be enforcing "hate speech" offences/ the HRCommission would be up in arms, etc etc, Condemnation would rain down from on high.
Post a Comment