I suppose it’s fairly easy to sack a customs worker for not getting a Covid jab, as they have here, and despite that they’ve already got the unions and advocates exercised.
But this is a bigger issue, I suspect than many of us have given thought to.
63 percent of American employers, according to a poll this week, are going to be demanding their workers are jabbed.
63 percent is a lot, and it will grow, given there will be some who will be sitting and waiting to see how it unfolds, and if it unfolds towards vaccination, they’ll pile on.
Now, the legals.
Obviously it’s easier in a job ad to say “and you must be jabbed.”
It’s a lot harder to go to an employee of long standing and say “right give us your arm.”
That wasn’t part of your job description, you didn’t agree to it when you started.
And no other jab or inoculation is required, so why now?
A lawyer is having a field day with this.
Now, next step, you’re running a large company, 1000 or more people.
You know full well there will be around 10 %, for whatever reason, who wouldn’t get the jab. They may be suspicious, maybe anti-vaxxers, so what are you going to do with them?
And what if a bunch of them turn out to be key players?
What if your CFO doesn’t want one? Your head of human resources? Your star salesperson? What are you going to do? What is anyone going to do?
This is different to a travel passport; the ball automatically falls in the court of those missing out. If you’re not jabbed, you can’t buy a ticket, so that’s your problem.
Back in the workplace your key people are your problem.
And that’s before you get to the political minefield of something like that ending up with competitors or in the public domain.
How much thought has been given to this, if any?
63% is a solid majority and because it’s a solid majority it creates the weight of expectation.
And the weight of expectation often leads to tension.
In a free and open society, we like to think we largely make our own rules and dance to our own tune.
In Russia, of course, they tell you what to do.
But no jab no job, in a place like New Zealand, how big a powder- keg do you reckon that could become?
Mike Hosking is a New Zealand television and radio broadcaster. He currently hosts The Mike Hosking Breakfast show on NewstalkZB on weekday mornings.
4 comments:
Very big. Any sane employer knows they can't insist on a jab if no provision has been made in the employees existing individual contract. Provision can and probably will be included in new individual contracts for new starts. If employers want to insist on the jab, they have to vary contracts and offer them to employees who are not obliged to accept.
In this case, the employees hold all the aces.
Perhaps there is a market for fake papers, and the whole thing becomes a sham.
These jabs are not for life. Latest info I came across is that the Pfizer jab gives protection for 6 months "or longer' but the implication was that you'd need jabs at least annually.
Vaccination is an intrusive medical intervention. We have a right to say 'no' and exercising that right should not cost us our livelihoods.
Good thoughts Mike. Using the USA to set a 63% figure into the discussion might be a little alarming for us here in NZ - 90% of the people I know are awake to this fake situation being propagated by the PM's office, and will not be a guinea pig for the unelected tyrant sitting in that office. Yes, they are loosing their jobs and having to find new ones with smart employers who are not breaching their employees Bill Of Rights by playing this vax discrimination game. If 90% of the people I know are playing it safe, and not allowing an experimental injection into their veins that is now killing and maming thousands across the world, with all evidence fully available to us outside of the main stream media channels, how many in your circle also refuse to risk death from this jab?
Post a Comment