The study, initially submitted to The Lancet and another journal but pulled from publication at the last moment, has now been peer-reviewed and made public.
The study analyses 325 autopsies of individuals who “died suddenly” shortly after receiving COVID-19 ‘vaccines’, making it the largest series of autopsy reports on this topic to date.
According to the paper, the mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days, with findings suggesting that 73.9% of the deaths were directly caused or significantly contributed to by the COVID-19 mRNA gene therapy (marketed to the public as a COVID ‘vaccine’), based on independent adjudication.
The authors, led by Dr. Peter McCullough and co-authored by others including Nic Hulscher, claim the study provides evidence linking COVID-19 mRNA vaccines to sudden deaths, especially within the first two weeks post-vaccination. The authors argue that this time frame is significant, as deaths occurring early after vaccination have been labelled by Big Pharma-funded medical authorities as occurring in “unvaccinated” individuals in official data.
According to the paper, the mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days, with findings suggesting that 73.9% of the deaths were directly caused or significantly contributed to by the COVID-19 mRNA gene therapy (marketed to the public as a COVID ‘vaccine’), based on independent adjudication.
The authors, led by Dr. Peter McCullough and co-authored by others including Nic Hulscher, claim the study provides evidence linking COVID-19 mRNA vaccines to sudden deaths, especially within the first two weeks post-vaccination. The authors argue that this time frame is significant, as deaths occurring early after vaccination have been labelled by Big Pharma-funded medical authorities as occurring in “unvaccinated” individuals in official data.
“Unprecedented censorship”
The path to publication was fraught with obstacles. The authors allege that their work faced “unprecedented censorship” from prominent medical journals, including The Lancet and another Elsevier publication, both of which reportedly withdrew the paper at the final stages of publication. “This has never been seen in scientific publishing before,” said one of the authors, reflecting on the process.
Implications of the findings
The study’s findings, which assert a causal link between mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and sudden deaths, have reignited debates over vaccine safety. Proponents of the study claim it fills a critical gap in understanding the short- and long-term effects of the COVID jab, particularly among individuals who experienced adverse outcomes.
Dr. McCullough, a vocal critic of mRNA vaccines, expressed gratitude for the persistence and hard work of the team involved. “This is a monumental achievement in the face of historically unprecedented scientific censorship,” he stated on social media, adding that the paper “proves why deaths were hidden” in the early stages of vaccine rollout.
Click to view
Daily Telegraph New Zealand (DTNZ) is an independent news website, first published in October 2021. - where this article was sourced.
No comments:
Post a Comment