New Zealand’s history is messy, fascinating, and occasionally absurd. The Maoris weren’t exactly sitting around in a utopia when the Europeans turned up. They were busy having a go at each other in tribal warfare and, yes, usually eating the losers.
The British didn’t arrive with halos over their heads either, but they did bring literacy, a legal system and building standards for a life above the dirt. They also brought an uncanny knack for signing treaties which actually meant something substantial when they were signed. The representatives of Queen Victoria would never have signed a treaty in her name without guaranteeing her full sovereignty over that colony. To say otherwise is part of the 'occasionally absurd’ bit.
History is full of uncomfortable truths, and we need to face them without indulging in the fashionable guilt or grievance narratives that dominate today’s hysterical reactions. And I mean hysterical.
Maoris were a tribal warrior society. They had their own cultural norms, some of which— like cannibalism — were undeniably primitive in the extreme. But the Europeans didn’t come to destroy Maori; they came to build a civilisation along with the Christian ethic of treating others as equals before God, that was the goal. Thank God it was the British and not the French or Portuguese who did the colonising. British missionaries, in particular, out of genuine affection, preserved the Maori language and even tried to mediate conflicts between tribes hell-bent on bloodlust, like Te Rauparaha's, no doubt screaming their “Ka Mate” haka while carving a bloody gash across the Waikato leaving nothing but misery and slaughter in their wake.
Far from eradicating Maori culture, many of the British were instrumental in safeguarding its survival. They recorded their language, they intermarried and mingled their bloodlines together and above all they formed valuable and much desired friendships. The British and Maori became kinsmen.
Yet, what do we see today? A toxic culture of division being perpetuated by activists who are only interested in ginning-up resentment. Instead of celebrating the benefits of a shared heritage — one that includes Western advancements that raised the standard of living for everyone — these agitators push for separatism. Co-governance, race-based laws, and constant demands for ‘decolonisation’ are going to rip our social fabric apart.
Here’s the truth: no nation can survive on the basis of two separate legal systems, one for one race and one for another. That is not equality, it’s apartheid, plain and simple. And what makes it worse is that this divisive ideology is being peddled under the guise of liberal ‘justice.’ It’s not liberal it’s just woke and it’s not justice, it’s Maori supremacy, brought to you by the United Nations.
We need to reject this path and embrace the only principles that made New Zealand a success: equality before the law, individual rights, and a shared national identity. We should respect Maori heritage, but respect isn’t achieved by bending the knee to historical grievances or rewriting the rules of governance to privilege one group over many others.
Maori culture, like Western culture, is worth preserving — and not through racial favouritism or endless guilt-tripping about colonisation. It’s preserved through genuine pride, mutual respect, and the recognition that we’re all citizens of the same country.
Kiwis are some of the most patriotic people you’ll ever meet. There’s a pride that runs deep in this country — pride in our way of life, pride in the freedoms we enjoy, and pride in the fact that we’ve created a society which, despite its flaws, is still one of the best in the world to live in. We’re fiercely protective of our home, our culture and our shared history.
So when we talk about Maori and Pakeha relations, it’s important to remember that the vast majority of New Zealanders — regardless of their background — are united in their love for this country. They want a future where we can all live side by side as equals, without the need for separate laws or separate systems of governance. This isn’t about ignoring the past or rejecting the Treaty; it’s about building a future that reflects the reality of what New Zealand is today: a diverse but unified country, where every person, regardless of their ancestry, has the same rights and accountabilities.
Many activists will try to tell you that New Zealand’s history is one of unrelenting oppression. They will paint colonisation as an unmitigated evil. Yes, colonialism was never perfect but I'm damn sick of the ‘apologitis’ which has become nothing more than a political virtue signal. When Maori make a formal apology to the descendants of the almost-genocided Moriori, let me know and I’ll die on the spot from pure shock.
Maori culture is invaluable and deserves respect, but so does the rest of New Zealand’s history and all of its people.
The Hikoi protest is nothing short of divisive. Protest is a legitimate form of free expression but when it’s used as a weapon to tear apart a nation it crosses a tragic line. The Hikoi is driven by activists who insist on highlighting Maori grievances to the exclusion of everything else and only serves to entrench hatred in this land.
What’s missing from the Hikoi is any genuine effort to heal and move forward together as one people. It’s one thing to acknowledge the past and its injustices, but it’s another entirely to hold the entire nation hostage to those grievances, as if the only way forward is by continually looking back upon one group of people. The reality is, most Kiwis want the same thing — respect for Maori culture and respect for our European heritage which gave us a parliament (and everything else).
It’s time to stop using history as a weapon to divide us. New Zealand should be better than this. We don’t need more race-based activism; we need unity, a shared vision for the future, and a commitment to ensuring every Kiwi — regardless of their background— has an equal shot at success.
Christopher Luxon’s weak-kneed approach to the Treaty Principles Bill is exactly what NZ does not need. At a time when Kiwis are yearning for strong leadership that stands up for unity and fair-mindedness, Luxon is pandering to the loudest voices, and it’s not just unmanly, cowardly and disgusting, it’s dangerous.
Rather than taking a firm stand for one law for all New Zealanders, he’s bending over backwards to appease those pushing a race-based agenda. He’s sending the message that we’re willing to accept two sets of rules for two sets of people. That’s not leadership; that’s total capitulation.
Kiwis are royally pissed at the constant ass-kissing. We want a New Zealand that’s united — not a country fractured along racial lines. Luxon should be advocating for the solid democratic principles that once built this country: equality before the law and a shared national identity, not this milquetoast compromising that does nothing but embolden the separatist nutters and their backward bollox of an agenda.
Leadership is about making tough decisions, not chasing “likes.” By not facilitating a way forward for Winston Peters and David Seymour, both important leaders within his coalition government, to work together to achieve one law for all, shows you Luxon does not want that. Never trust a globalist. He has failed the leadership test. We need someone who will stand up for what’s right, not what’s convenient.
So what’s the solution? It’s very, very simple: equality before the law.
One law applies to all New Zealand citizens, no exceptions. We respect the past, but we don’t let it dictate the future needlessly. We celebrate our shared heritage — warts and all — and focus on building a country where everyone has a fair go regardless of their ancestry. That means ditching the guilt trips, the victimhood, and especially the craven pandering.
Olivia is a NZ blogger, author and essayist who likes to write about history and its wide influence on our present time. This article was sourced HERE
Maoris were a tribal warrior society. They had their own cultural norms, some of which— like cannibalism — were undeniably primitive in the extreme. But the Europeans didn’t come to destroy Maori; they came to build a civilisation along with the Christian ethic of treating others as equals before God, that was the goal. Thank God it was the British and not the French or Portuguese who did the colonising. British missionaries, in particular, out of genuine affection, preserved the Maori language and even tried to mediate conflicts between tribes hell-bent on bloodlust, like Te Rauparaha's, no doubt screaming their “Ka Mate” haka while carving a bloody gash across the Waikato leaving nothing but misery and slaughter in their wake.
Far from eradicating Maori culture, many of the British were instrumental in safeguarding its survival. They recorded their language, they intermarried and mingled their bloodlines together and above all they formed valuable and much desired friendships. The British and Maori became kinsmen.
Yet, what do we see today? A toxic culture of division being perpetuated by activists who are only interested in ginning-up resentment. Instead of celebrating the benefits of a shared heritage — one that includes Western advancements that raised the standard of living for everyone — these agitators push for separatism. Co-governance, race-based laws, and constant demands for ‘decolonisation’ are going to rip our social fabric apart.
Here’s the truth: no nation can survive on the basis of two separate legal systems, one for one race and one for another. That is not equality, it’s apartheid, plain and simple. And what makes it worse is that this divisive ideology is being peddled under the guise of liberal ‘justice.’ It’s not liberal it’s just woke and it’s not justice, it’s Maori supremacy, brought to you by the United Nations.
We need to reject this path and embrace the only principles that made New Zealand a success: equality before the law, individual rights, and a shared national identity. We should respect Maori heritage, but respect isn’t achieved by bending the knee to historical grievances or rewriting the rules of governance to privilege one group over many others.
Maori culture, like Western culture, is worth preserving — and not through racial favouritism or endless guilt-tripping about colonisation. It’s preserved through genuine pride, mutual respect, and the recognition that we’re all citizens of the same country.
Kiwis are some of the most patriotic people you’ll ever meet. There’s a pride that runs deep in this country — pride in our way of life, pride in the freedoms we enjoy, and pride in the fact that we’ve created a society which, despite its flaws, is still one of the best in the world to live in. We’re fiercely protective of our home, our culture and our shared history.
So when we talk about Maori and Pakeha relations, it’s important to remember that the vast majority of New Zealanders — regardless of their background — are united in their love for this country. They want a future where we can all live side by side as equals, without the need for separate laws or separate systems of governance. This isn’t about ignoring the past or rejecting the Treaty; it’s about building a future that reflects the reality of what New Zealand is today: a diverse but unified country, where every person, regardless of their ancestry, has the same rights and accountabilities.
Many activists will try to tell you that New Zealand’s history is one of unrelenting oppression. They will paint colonisation as an unmitigated evil. Yes, colonialism was never perfect but I'm damn sick of the ‘apologitis’ which has become nothing more than a political virtue signal. When Maori make a formal apology to the descendants of the almost-genocided Moriori, let me know and I’ll die on the spot from pure shock.
Maori culture is invaluable and deserves respect, but so does the rest of New Zealand’s history and all of its people.
The Hikoi protest is nothing short of divisive. Protest is a legitimate form of free expression but when it’s used as a weapon to tear apart a nation it crosses a tragic line. The Hikoi is driven by activists who insist on highlighting Maori grievances to the exclusion of everything else and only serves to entrench hatred in this land.
What’s missing from the Hikoi is any genuine effort to heal and move forward together as one people. It’s one thing to acknowledge the past and its injustices, but it’s another entirely to hold the entire nation hostage to those grievances, as if the only way forward is by continually looking back upon one group of people. The reality is, most Kiwis want the same thing — respect for Maori culture and respect for our European heritage which gave us a parliament (and everything else).
It’s time to stop using history as a weapon to divide us. New Zealand should be better than this. We don’t need more race-based activism; we need unity, a shared vision for the future, and a commitment to ensuring every Kiwi — regardless of their background— has an equal shot at success.
Christopher Luxon’s weak-kneed approach to the Treaty Principles Bill is exactly what NZ does not need. At a time when Kiwis are yearning for strong leadership that stands up for unity and fair-mindedness, Luxon is pandering to the loudest voices, and it’s not just unmanly, cowardly and disgusting, it’s dangerous.
Rather than taking a firm stand for one law for all New Zealanders, he’s bending over backwards to appease those pushing a race-based agenda. He’s sending the message that we’re willing to accept two sets of rules for two sets of people. That’s not leadership; that’s total capitulation.
Kiwis are royally pissed at the constant ass-kissing. We want a New Zealand that’s united — not a country fractured along racial lines. Luxon should be advocating for the solid democratic principles that once built this country: equality before the law and a shared national identity, not this milquetoast compromising that does nothing but embolden the separatist nutters and their backward bollox of an agenda.
Leadership is about making tough decisions, not chasing “likes.” By not facilitating a way forward for Winston Peters and David Seymour, both important leaders within his coalition government, to work together to achieve one law for all, shows you Luxon does not want that. Never trust a globalist. He has failed the leadership test. We need someone who will stand up for what’s right, not what’s convenient.
So what’s the solution? It’s very, very simple: equality before the law.
One law applies to all New Zealand citizens, no exceptions. We respect the past, but we don’t let it dictate the future needlessly. We celebrate our shared heritage — warts and all — and focus on building a country where everyone has a fair go regardless of their ancestry. That means ditching the guilt trips, the victimhood, and especially the craven pandering.
Olivia is a NZ blogger, author and essayist who likes to write about history and its wide influence on our present time. This article was sourced HERE
57 comments:
Excellent article ... One of the best I have seen, well done Olivia
Brilliant.
Appeasement has not and will not work.
Olivia, really well written, thank you.
Have you sent copies to every MP ?
Don't bother sending it to the Maori MPs, because they have closed minds, wouldn't read it, and certainly would never agree with a word of it.
Excellent - now to construct an action plan to prevent tribal rule.
Well said Olivia, thank you. A commentary such as this should be published in a mainstream news paper, but it won’t be. No chance against the inherent bias which has ruined the likes of the Herald.
Maori revere the bones of their ancestors. In the early days of Auckland, Robinsons Mill announced that it would pay 3 pence for every bag of bones delivered to them to be used for fertilizer. Robinsons asked the Northland Maori what they should do with the "rather many" bones that they delivered to them. They replied that they did not know and did not care. Robinsons counted the skulls, and there were in excess of 60,000 of them.
Kevan
It seems that the only people who would disagree with you Olivia are those in all the important positions in this country. Perhaps the stable door is wide open and the horse well and truly gone? We need a very thorough cleaning of these stables before NZ can ever hope to recover its former pride and reputation. I am not confident for our future.
To Anon at 9.55. Exactly right. Critical Race Theory has long infiltrated NZ's main institutions. Parliament demonstrates this daily. Seymour knows the gravity of this issue. He is pushing the TP Bill now so that - despite Luxon's blockage - voters will have a chance to engage and save NZ from and other Left wing disaster in 2026. This will be the last chance and only be a temporary reprieve.
Olivia - please draft a submission letter for us all to sign
Thank you Olivia. I agree with previous writers-This should be compulsory reading for every man, woman and child in the country and the subject matter the main reason National was able to form a Coalition government. That Chris Luxon cannot see this, or doesn’t want to, is deeply concerning. If he does not see the need for David Seymour’s bill, he should have been already informing those that backed him, how he intends to get the country back on track to an equal rights system as opposed to apartheid.
Well stated, but I would change just one sentence:
'It’s time to stop using MADE UP history as a weapon to divide us..........'
Absolutely outstanding Olivier. I’m a fifth generation kiwi who was proud of our historic bi-cultural unity until political engineering turned our country upside down.
The agitators just want to be in the maori elite club. Simple as that in a tribal society. The grassroots people will be treated as such by the elites.
Outstanding article, Olivia.
It is an excellent, accurate and very unbiassed description of our country and it's history.
Thank You for you level headed approach to this potentially inflammatory issue.
The vast majority of us are united in our love of our multicultural nation.
Outstanding commentary Olivia - well said. Your views will be shared by thousands who are thoroughly pissed off with the tiresome, never-ending maori circus that has poisoned NZ to its knees.
Absolutely, anon.
An excellent commentary, thank you Olivia.
Mr Luxon’s inanity towards the Treaty principles Bill was clearly illustrated when asked what he did not like about the bill, he relied, very vehemently and angrily, “NOTHING!” Amazing!
Principle 3 states: Everyone is equal before the law.
Wow! Mr Luxon dislikes that? Hard not to think Mr Luxon is the wrong choice as our Prime Minister.
Many are now perceiving Mr Luxon as a Prime Minister that believes and supports the “down trodden and dispossessed” fabricated construct but his predominant fear is the one of civil unrest. He would be absolutely fearful of having his CV tarnished with “The leader who caused racial conflict in NZ.” He is going to leave that foul task to a successor.
His objective is to “check the politics/Prime Minister” box on his CV, do his stint in politics, ensuring there are enough “successes” on the CV and move on to a role on the international stage.
Luxon will be remembered as the PM who said - “the maori gravy train didn’t stop with me!"
Excellent piece.. on our it really is at present in our desirable country which is why I support David Seymour 100 per cent like so many others
Well done Olivia,you have summed up what most Kiwis are thinking but do not have your skills to collate it all.
This needs to be in every newspaper in the country,fat chance there I`m afraid. I won`t even mention TV.
Any chance of you becoming an ACT MP? Minister of common sense sounds good.
Great little comment from Anna Mouse at 7.08am.
Thanks again Olivia.
Kawana those bones ground up for fertilizer belonged to a pre-Maori race, that's why Maori did not care about the bones. This had been documented.
I think your article Olivia and the responses sum up what many in my circle, including Maori, are thinking at the moment. I can't disagree with anything. I think you have hit the nail on the head with your comments about the lack of leadership on this issue, of one Christopher Luxon. Stonewalling without offering an alternative path by the senior coalition partner, or at least an explanation of their position, will be will be this governments downfall and then we will be in big trouble.
Olivia,
Outstanding. So well said.
I started to read this much earlier but got distracted with the many things to do for the day.
At first, because you said "The British didn’t arrive with halos over their heads either..." I left it there, but I gave you a second chance and extremely glad I did. Probably because you have so many positive comments too. Congratulations you really have captured what so many people are feeling.
I had just finished reading Barry Soper's piece too, above, but was confused by what he was saying. But this piece was not confusing or pandering.
I wrote about my ancestors the other day but it was a few days later than the post was so got relegated to the pages that are way in the past. I'm going to repeat it here because it speaks to a few very valid points you talk about. I'll paste in another comment below.
Thank you so much.
People forget the hardships which these colonists, they were pioneers, had to endure, life was not easy. The journey they took was long and treacherous too. These pioneers came in good faith.
One of my great great grandfathers was one of 500, and the only European to be involved with building Rangiātea Church in Otaki. Te Rauparaha, who, coincidentally in this case, wrote the Haka Kamate Kamate, was a notorious chief, but as he grew older became more philosophical, and was quite a wise pollitician. Although he did not become a Christian he felt this church would be a way forward and good for the people of Ngati Poneke. He obviously liked my great great grandfather and honoured him by giving him the name Huia, which of course was a treasured bird for it's feathers which the chiefs wore on their head. He was a skilled carpenter and crafted the windows. He was a small and thin man, indeed weathered, but, had great fortitude.
Now on the other hand, my other great great grandfather, was a gentleman, a business man, and made his money as a reputable pork butcher. Te Rauparaha liked this man too! For he was able to procure large amounts of pork meat and was also given a gift by Te Rauparaha. This happened to be a Waka Huia, a carved box, in which you put these feathers into, owned by chiefs only.
November 19, 2024 at 12:32 PM
Regrettably while this article makes good sense, maori have so debased their own culture ( that which might have been of value eg not utu and cannibalism) that i will go for the more modern invention of poi and a few songs such as Pokarekareana. The ghastly haka, culture of war and brutality and witchdoctors are best consigned to history.
In fact, Philip, it was wise of them to destroy such evidence, of course.
Thank you Olivia for mentioning the determination by early missionaries to teach Maori literacy in their own language. It was the Maori chiefs who had a petition to parliament to have their children learn English because they believed that was most advantageous to them.
It was Progressivism-Marxism that destroyed our once excellent traditional education which taught English literacy well. This destructive dual force mentioned , has created the Maori underclass, with poor literacy skills and our country with the long tail of underachievement .
Improving this underachievement is what desperately needs to be focused on to get equality for all. But since the recent protest is also tainted with the Marxism in Critical Race Theory, they are highly unlikely to ever consider this. Their ideology , as always is paramount to them instead of a genuine concern for people's real needs.
I think it is very kind of Olivia to not dwell on the more morbid aspects here. It was not just merely the spoils of war, but also a fresh supply, a larder so to speak, that would be at hand and employed also to do menial tasks.
It's sad that this has to come up from time to time. Sometimes it is best to leave the past in the past. It is time to move on. Focusing on improving ones outcomes is the ticket here, and Tangata Maori have all the resources, because, going about on their high horse will bring out all the dirty laundry.
I disagree wholeheartedly with the sentiment in this post. Its disregards the true history of New Zealand and seeks only to benefit a certain group of people.
Equality is nothing without equity. And I would urge you to spend more time researching equity and privilege, particularly the systemic privilege prevalent in New Zealand that favors one group over others. Equality seeks only to benefit those already living in privilege, equity seeks to see all people living with the same outcomes, regardless of where they are from.
The hikoi was a peaceful protest that showed the huge solidarity many people feel towards the divisive hate that is a government thinking that they can make changes for the indigenous group of New Zealand, without even giving them the opportunity to speak on the bill themselves. 100,000 people took the time out of their day to be there, with many more standing in solidarity with this movement.
I would urge you to seek the answers you are looking for from reputable sources and consider the privilege you yourself hold in living here, when others have had to learn to survive in their own native country subject to IMPORTED racism and disadvantage. To suggest that Maori living in New Zealand are subject to privilege over everyone else means you have no idea what it is to be living in New Zealand as an indigenous culture that had to fight for the right to even just retain their language, or their livelihoods.
The concept of needing to change New Zealands founding document is what is divisive.
The description of Maori in this post is divisive and offensive, and I'm not even Maori. It basically depicts Maori as illiterate and that the beloved British came providing everything that they didn't have and needed. I'm sure if you spoke to many indigenous New Zealanders they would also find this description offensive, untrue and seeking to justify the harms caused to many nations in the name of colonization.
Perhaps it would pay to learn more about Maori culture and history, from the actual people themselves, as opposed to a severely biased colonized account that seeks to justify the mistreatment of Maori.
“A toxic culture of division being perpetuated by activists who are only interested in ginning-up resentment. Instead of celebrating the benefits of a shared heritage — one that includes Western advancements that raised the standard of living for everyone — these agitators push for separatism. Co-governance, race-based laws, and constant demands for ‘decolonisation’ are going to rip our social fabric apart”.
Exactly Olivia. The seeds of which were sown with the enacting of the 1975 TOW Act, by our very own government of the day, with no referendum given to the people who’s sweat equity pays for this “so called democratic parliament”.
Re: ANON 3:08
>"Equality is nothing without equity."
I'll accept that for the sake of argument. But what translates equality of opportunity into equality of outcomes is people pulling themselves up by the bootstraps. You have equality of opportunity in this country but you may CHOOSE (a horrible word for PC-pseudointellectuals) to not do anything about it. In which case it's your lookout, not the State's and not the taxpayer's.
>>... systemic privilege prevalent in New Zealand that favors one group over others. "
This is the neo-marxist dogma: wherever group B appears to be a bit below group A, it must be because group A is sitting and shitting on group B. How about some empirical evidence of this? Not of the disparities - that's common knowledge - but of the wicked system bringing this about. This is just utter bullshit but marxofascists, like fundamentalist religious believers (with whom they share a great deal), will cling onto this absurdity for dear life.
>"... an indigenous culture that had to fight for the right to even just retain their language, or their livelihoods."
Retaining your language when you speak a minority tongue is up to you and your family, as it was for us Dutchies and other European immigrants. As for livelihoods, the modernisation of the economy created heaps of new livelihoods. What on earth are you on about?
>"... I'm sure if you spoke to many indigenous New Zealanders they would also find this description offensive".
Yeah, that's right, put on the I'm-so-offended act to squash any rational discussion and debate on the issue. Typical marxofascist response alongside the question-begging.
What a drag..........
'It basically depicts Maori as illiterate and that the beloved British came providing everything that they didn't have and needed.'
Explain to the folk here how a society that had not alphabet nor written langauage is not in fact illiterate?
The English came to NZ and they did give them the alphabet with which to codify Te Reo in a written form.
That said I disagree wholeheartedly with your entire post. This article in no way disregards the true history of New Zealand. The true history has been obfuscated for too long.
Someone could spend 1000+ words explaining how many things you are completely ignorant of, factually incorrect and plainly wrong in your comment but I am guessing it would be wasted.
I will put one thing on the table. I do not know where you got your figure for the statement '100,000 people took the time out of their day to be there....' FFS even Packer never made that many up.
I'd suggest frankly it you who needs to seek answers from reputable sources away from the rabbit hole of sanctimony you seem to collect your thoughts from.
As the vast majority of the others have said, a splendid effort Olivia, that summarises much of what many of us think. Our PM has completely misread the room and, in his denunciation of Seymour’s Bill, he is also a patent hypocrite when one reads what he signed in his coalition agreement with NZ First and what it also seeks to achieve by way of equality for all. As many others have identified, he is an invertebrate and not the leader our country so desperately needs at this time.
As for anon@3.08pm's comments - a typical case of someone whose woke mind is embedded in grievance and misdirected privilege, showing a gobsmacking ignorance of our true history, yet alone someone with a desire to move forward in unity, prosperity and, by necessity, as equals.
but .. but Maori were the first here - yeh right!
The comments here show what an awful mess NZ has got itself into.
Tried to share this on FB and got instantly dleted. who is pulling strings?
No one is headed for equity in any way shape or form, sorry to say, by all hailing to the Marxists. Anonymous at 3:08 pm.
This I can assure you, "this perfect ideal of society", is a smokescreen and is no way forward.
Anon@8.20 - thanks to past politicians and those in the judiciary. When will we learn to demand our say?
Well written - and I am sure the view of most New Zealanders - old and new. Luxon’s response to the treaty principles bill is very disappointing. The problem is that with MMP we are not likely to get a strong political leader with enough of a majority to do what is necessary. The UN is a significant part of the problem for New Zealand and globally. I see significant turmoil ahead before any of this is resolved. UN pushing the climate agenda - but why do they not look at the factors in the universe that have created catastrophic swings in climate over millions of years - before any human life.
What is FB ?
Excellent summary Olivia.
The Hikoi contained fewer than 1% of NZers and only a small % of Maori, whatever that means.
I would suggest that the vast majority do not know nor understand the content of Seymour's Bill.
The Elitists of this movement should be very careful not to invite a backlash from a Society which is no longer Maori and Pakeha, but a wonderfully Cosmopolitan mix of several other Peoples and Cultures.
It is high-time that the Activists understand the meaning of an important word in their language.
Whakakotahitanga.
Which means
UNITY.
God help New Zealand !!
The UN is the problem.
Wonderful factual writings Olivia! I hope the PM is inwardly digesting the contents & peparing to support David Seymour 100%
We have a wonderful country & the activists & so called Maori elite need to realise how the majority of the country feels !!
Thank god some one still has some common sense, I agree with everything Olivia says.
There are no full blooded NZ Maori. Our ancestors largely loved each other so we are a mix.
A total load of bullshit you’re telling me British didn’t have their inter tribal warfares and killings amongst themselves, Scots, Irish, Welsh that’s not including Vikings. Today those countries still hate the British with venom. Your story sounds like a fairytale. You know absolutely nothing about our chief Te Rauparaha. I know where he was born been there. British abolish all maaori being spoken in schools, abolished all tohunga practises. Maaori not allowed into certain establishments that was still the case when I was born. It’s all written in the history books. Whereby British killed hundreds of thousands In their homeland and other countries they tried to conquer.
>"you’re telling me British didn’t have their inter tribal warfares and killings amongst themselves, Scots, Irish, Welsh that’s not including Vikings. Today those countries still hate the British with venom."
Other than some anti-monarchical Irish, the English, Scots and Welsh get along just fine. As for the Scandinavian countries (presumably what you mean by Viking country), it's all peace and harmony except maybe when they're facing off in soccer. You're not on something, are you?
>"I know where he was born been there."
Great. Share that information WITH HARD EVIDENCE. We'll soon see which narrative qualifies as 'a fairytale'.
>>"British abolish all ... tohunga practises."
Evidence? No hearsay bullshit, hard documentary evidence. The word 'all' is the problem here. And you do realise, of course, that legislation after 1907 wasn't 'British' but by the independent Dominion of NZ.
>"Maaori not allowed into certain establishments that was still the case when I was born. "
Name them.
>"Whereby British killed hundreds of thousands In their homeland"
Not here they didn't, at least not according to anyone who could count. Now, there was this genocidal maniac called Te Rauparaha, of course........
Touché. Another genocidal maniac who killed 60,000 of fellow countrymen between 1820-1830 was Ngapuhi Hongi Hika.
Olivia’s powerfully written piece has broken a record on Breaking Views by attracting more endorsement than any other contributor. Her work deserves to be presented to Cabinate and acted upon, forcing the PM to get over himself and publicly support David Seymour’s bill.
See: http://onenzfoundation.co.nz/the-six-documents-that-made-new-zealand-into-a-british-colony/
I am wondering when Peters and Seymoor are going for a vote of no confidence, and get Luxon have to pack his bags.
Even in the National party there will be a better choice as leader.
Maybe even Judith Collins ( do I have to trust her ??)
A good start would be to get rid of Maori seats. Long past there use-by date, especially since MMP. Next thing would be to ban Te Pati Maori party until they pledge allegiance to our parliamentary system of governance and recognise Parliament.. Why are they sitting in a Parliament they don,t recognise? Sedtion
EERIE! You have been inside my head Olivier! Apart from the tiny group of anonymous (a proportion of nutters is always with us) it is pleasing to see the silent majority giving voice for a change in comments. Your view deserves a wide audience and is sorely needed.
Absolutely brilliant Olivia! Have posted the link all over the Fb hikoi pages 🤣
“Maori culture is invaluable and deserves respect”?
Really?
THE MYTH OF THE NOBLE SAVAGE
Communists have been pushing the Maori barrow in New Zealand since 1935, when the Communist Party of New Zealand ran in the General Election of that year on a plank which included: “Self-determination of the Māoris [sic] to the point of complete separation.”
Ever wondered why?
Communism, despite its oft-stated commitment to atheism, actually demonstrates a remarkably religious framework.
Marxism is based on a blasphemous, secular version of the Christian creation story and account of the Fall of Humankind.
If your goal is to subvert all existing social conditions, clothe your message in vestments people will subliminally recognise, so they don’t twig to what you’re trying to do.
Once upon a time, people lived in a [sinless] state of ‘primitive communism’ [Garden of Eden] in which there was no money or private property, meaning greed and selfishness were unknown.
Social or economic inequality didn’t exist, and everyone lived in peace, harmony, and amity with one another and with nature.
The Serpent in this Eden was the development of private property [Original Sin], which caused man to become alienated [the Fall] from his ‘true nature’ as a ‘social being.’
At that point humanity started to become greedy, self-seeking, acquisitive, and environmentally exploitative.
This is why Marxists defend, idolise, and extol primitive peoples: they see them as exemplifying humankind’s true, authentic nature that the development of private property caused to be lost [Paradise Lost].
Marx was never known for his originality. He filched this idea from Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s concept of ‘The Noble Savage.’
The notion of ‘The Noble Savage ’ was Rousseau's romantic conception of man as enjoying a natural and noble existence until civilisation makes him a slave to unnatural wants and corrupts him.
Rousseau believed that only the ‘uncorrupted savage’ is in possession of true virtue.
Far more apt, as the actual history of the Māori and other primitive peoples makes clear, is the Hobbesian ‘State of Nature,’ in which ‘every man’s hand is against every other man’s,’ ‘no man is secure in his life or in his property’ and ‘life is nasty, brutish, and short.’
What is now New Zealand consisted, pre-Treaty, of two main land masses and some offshore islands inhabited by numerous petty warring tribes “bearing few, if any political relations to one another; and who have proved incompetent to act, or even deliberate in concert,” as Lord Normanby put it in his 1839 instructions to Captain Hobson.
The was no country until the English came and created one under the sovereignty vested in Queen Victoria by the TOW.
In the absence of a universally acknowledged civil government and laws to provide for land ownership, in 1840, the various tribes owned NOTHING.
They simply used or occupied it under the constant threat of extermination until a stronger bunch of bullyboys came along and took it off them.
Standing astride a bit of dirt, taiaha in hand, until someone puts a patu through your head and stuffs you in the hāngi pit is NOT ownership.
The only universally acknowledged tikanga between tribal groups was "te rau o te patu" [the law of the club] aka "might makes right."
Light years away from the love fest mythologised by Marx and Rousseau.
If anyone can point to a single discovery, innovation, or invention that has come out of Māori culture to the wider benefit of humanity, table it.
An ugly, gesticulating, tongue-poking, eye rolling, thigh-slapping war dance of limited curiosity value when deployed before a rugby match or as a marketing tool for the tourism industry doesn’t count.
It is nonsensical cultural relativism to suggest that a primitive culture is fit to touch the hem of the korowai of the greatest culture age world has ever seen—the West’s Judeo-Christian culture.
Māori culture?
Worthless and atavistic if we’re objective and honest.
I suppose everyone is entitled to identify with a particular culture that is part of their ancestry. In the ancient past most cultures experienced their positives and negatives (if I can put it that way); everyone has had their share of heroes and villains.
Maybe I am biased, as some would suggest, but I don't think that I want to be influenced greatly by a pagan culture that, up until a few generations ago, practised war, slavery, infanticide and even cannibalism (surely one of the most taboo of human depravities).
Excellent, thoughtful article.
What does "decolonization" actually mean?
Away from its buzz-word status?
To 'decolonize' a country surely means to remove all the trapping the colonists bought with them.
That means removing western clothing, forgoing the written language which was created by the missionaries, walking everywhere instead of travelling by Harley, eating the neighbours you don't like, forgoing sanitary products, and not wearing silly cowboy hats in Parliament.
You cannot 'decolonize' a country without removing the civilized trappings of colonization.
If you claim otherwise, you are a hypocrite.
Post a Comment