This is no surprise to logical thinkers. Simply upping benefits doesn't mean the extra money will be well spent. Benefit increases have the effect of drawing more people onto benefits, away from work and the structure work brings to people's lives.
But the following admission from the Rotorua Lakes District Council nevertheless surprised me:
"Millions of dollars in welfare has to deliver the desired impact of hope and positive change, instead, Rotorua has seen a steady increase in deprivation since the onset of Covid-19, largely driven by increased benefit rates."
It's an odd sentence though and I wonder if 'has' in the first line was meant to be 'was'?
If local body bureaucrats really believe that simply pouring more money into workless households will create "positive change" they are naive in the extreme.
The report authors note also that Rotorua is second to bottom of 67 councils for crime. Yet isn't it a tenet of the left that decreasing benefits causes crime? Seems the opposite is happening.
Let's hope a few more officials start to cotton on.
Update
In this Bay of Plenty report Rotorua MP Todd McClay uses the term benefit rate to mean the number of people on benefits whereas 'benefit rates' normally mean payment rate.
Either way my contention holds up. Benefit payment rates AND benefit numbers have risen under Labour.
1 comment:
Our current government most certainly DO think that throwing money at any problem will magically fix it.
They're not averse to also throwing money at lost causes, nice-to-haves, woke nonsense and pointless arts projects.
What they can't do is make a practical, workable plan, spend efficiently, and do cost-benefit analyses.
It's amazing how much you can save when you first take the trouble to work out your spending is completely unjustified.
Post a Comment