In this interview, Chris Hipkins states that the money given to councils for Three Waters was compensation for taking water assets off Councils, the exact opposite of what Nanaia Mahuta said.
Tuesday, March 12, 2024
David Farrar: Hipkins tells the truth
Labels: Chris Hipkins, compensation, David Farrar, Nanaia Mahuta, Three WatersIn this interview, Chris Hipkins states that the money given to councils for Three Waters was compensation for taking water assets off Councils, the exact opposite of what Nanaia Mahuta said.
3 comments:
So up on TREASON charges then?
Duuuu, Nanaia said she wasn’t taking water assets away from councils, she’s a politician and I believe her 👍
Chippy is a politician and therefore I believe him, and he said he was paying councils for taking their water assets.
They weren’t taking the assets they were paying for them , with your and my taxes. So they are both correct ✅
It’s not stealing if you pay for stuff with other peoples money.
Anon 2.19: It comes down to the semantics of 'ownership'. Councils would've still 'owned' the water assets as they would've remained on their books (NM), but they wouldn't have 'owned' the water assets as they wouldn't have had control of those assets (CH).
Typical doublethink from the last unlamented administration, which in this context amounted to daylight robbery of local body assets by the national (small 'n') government.
LFC
Post a Comment