Click to view
* We now have a fascist white supremacist government
* She hopes David Seymour never breeds
* The Government has a deliberate policy to kill off maori
Yet this person gets treated by the media as a neutral expert, with masses of air and print time. Now imagine a right leaning academic said the Ardern Government was a Marxist racist Government, how Jacinda should never breed, and they have a deliberate policy to kill off Europeans. How much media space would that person get – zero right. They would rightfully be dismissed as an extremist.
People have every right to be an extremist. It's good we get to see how deranged some of these people are. But lets not pretend they are neutral experts.
David Farrar runs Curia Market Research, a specialist opinion polling and research agency, and the popular Kiwiblog where this article was sourced. He previously worked in the Parliament for eight years, serving two National Party Prime Ministers and three Opposition Leaders.
14 comments:
It's fun watching these far-Left "experts" losing their shit and showing their true colours. They think this endears them to the public at large but it only resonates with the other nutters they exclusively associate with.
True to form, TVNZ doesn't report it, even after it's brought to their attention.
Actions should have consequences and yet again they are failing in their basic duty of full, fair and balanced reporting. Will they ever learn?
Interesting...
Those comments would clearly qualify as "hate speech" and be subject to criminal proceedings, under Comrade Ardern's definition.
As usual for the Left, an "ad personam" attack.
The only thing they know how to do.
Darwin who is one of the people the Left, follow religiously and many of his ideas the basis for Marxism, was a blatant white supremacist. Just read his book 'Descent of Man'. Darwin believed for example the aborigines of Australia were an inferior race close to the apes and who should be culled .This is exactly what happened in Tasmania.
DeeM.
Yes it is fun to watch. They don’t get it that this is democracy in action, the Coalition is doing exactly what they said ithey would do and the majority agrees.
DeeM once again I agree, the left nutters are squealing loudly, which means they are scampering for the hole they crawled out from.
Fantastic to watch the pendulum swing.
Still once again, shame on tvnz for not reporting this, they probably ran something on how great labour are instead.
Oh if only I had it my way there would be massive change at tvnz and they would be forced to tell the truth. Wouldn't look great for the left loonies tho now would it?
Erica (above) is poorly informed. Darwinism was rejected by the early Marxists and was anathema to Stalin because of the role of competition in Natural Selection, which they found ideologically unpalatable. Soviet science was set back by Stalin's insistence that evolution followed Lamarckian rules viz the inheritance of acquired characteristics.
Victorian science saw human races as being categorisable with reference to a spectrum from the most primitive to the most advanced (Arthur Conan Doyle believed that the Anglo-Saxon race was the one at the top of the tree.) The notion of White supremacy was pretty well universal and could even be described as a good thing in one sense - in that it came with a duty of care towards the lower races. Darwin went along with the prevailing view of higher and lower races - he certainly didn't invent the notion and it is grossly unfair to blame him for racism of any sort which after all has been around for as long as human beings have recognised racial differences. Which is a long, long time........
I am not the only one to believe there is little question Darwin's theory of evolution is the philosophical basis of anti-Christian Western culture and contributed to institutionalized atheism, one of the main tenets of Marxism.
Rejecting God, Darwinists postulated that life arose accidentally by purely naturalistic processes. All the Christian values could be trashed as eg believing all men were equal and to be treated with dignity and respect which also opened the way for accepting Darwin's racist perspective.
Of course racism has always been around but not only does Darwin believe in white supremacy ,he offers a powerful biological explanation for it, namely that white people are further evolved: As white people exterminate and replace the world's
"savage races" and as great apes go extinct, Darwin Wrote , that the gap between civilized man and his closest evolutionary ancestor will widen. White Europeans at the top and apes at the bottom.
In his theory, coloured people fall somewhere in between. Modern man is essentially restricted only to white Europeans,with all other races viewed as essentially sub-human.
The Darwinian text of 'Descent of Man' from which the above quotes and ideas come, contain disturbing racist and white supremacist ideology which could only
have boosted the ideology for some people. The text has therefore notably been absent from most biology courses and reference to it omitted by Barend.
Far from killing off maori, with its generous benefits and fancy new state apartments and no preesure to identify fathers and now a myriad pro maori maori health practioners the Govt is encouraging not killing off maori. The birth statistics are such that we will need all the help the Islams can provide to ward of maori control by democratic process (now that the co governance con is apparently recognised)
The person should be dismissed from her position pronto. Any colonist or descendant making similar but counter statements would be cancelled big time.
>I am not the only one to believe there is little question Darwin's theory of evolution is the philosophical basis of anti-Christian Western culture and contributed to institutionalized atheism, one of the main tenets of Marxism.
No, you're not - there are plenty like you. That is to say, folks who believe in a Bronze Age tribal desert spook waving a magic wand. And who do not do their homework........
>Rejecting God, Darwinists postulated that life arose accidentally by purely naturalistic processes
try having a look at Darwin's seminal book 'The Origin of Species by Natural Selection' - just the last paragraph of that work - and you will see that Darwin mentions a Creator. He was a deist at that time (he later became an agnostic) who believed that God had set the wheels in motion and then let them run their course - the same view that other great deists had, such as Isaac Newton.
As for the atheism, it was Ernst Haeckel who was the main driving force behind instilling explicit atheism into science. Thomas Huxley came close but invented the word 'agnosticism' to accommodate the growing idea among the intelligentsia that there are things that are unknowable.
It would be nice if people like you had the intellectual decency to check out primary sources when making wild accusations. But you live a lie so you might as well tell a few.
Nolw go tell Old Spooky to throw a thunderbolt at me.
Read Guns, Getms and Steel by Jared Diamond.
Incidentally white film never killed off Maori. Maori were systematically doing that themselves. White people helped free Maori from vicious tribal warfare and supplemented the gene pool quite generously.
Let's narrow the topic down to the descent of man which is also the title of Darwin's book, written 12 years after the Origin of Species.Descent is most relevant to the topic at hand of white supremacy and racism. This book offered a detailed explanation of man's descent from ape -like ancestors contrary to much Christian belief. Incidentally Newton was a dedicated Christian , as were Bacon, Kepler, Pascal, Faraday, Copernicus etc.see Wikipaedia.
Professor of Zoology, Ernest Mayr of Harvard University 2001, defined Darwinism as the rejection of all supernatural phenomena and causations. The theory of evolution by natural selection explains the adaptatedness and diversity of the world solely materialistically. It no longer requires God as creator or designer. This is the conclusion Darwinism inevitably led to.
I will happily align myself with the 3000 professors and scientists with a Ph.D in some field of science worldwide and which includes a dozen Nobel prize winners in a list assembled by Dr Jerry Bergman who reject Darwinism as defined as variation caused by mutations plus natural selection ultimately accounts for all life forms.This is but a small percentage of the estimated 113,000 Darwin Skeptic scientists and academics in the US alone according to Harvard researcher (Gross and Simmons). The people on these lists could be much greater but there is a concern' coming out of the closet' would adversely impact their careers. Observe the ridicule Darwinists inflict on those with a counter view right on this site.
For me Darwinism is a theory in crisis and the sooner it is replaced with something else the better.
Science progresses by self-criticism and continuous modification. No scientific theory is complete and the synthetic theory of evolution (viz Natural Selection + genetics) is no exception. The dissatisfaction with a scientific theory in its current form does not, however, create any space for spooks. Saying that a spook did something is just another way of saying the speaker doesn't know how something came about.
You say that "For [you] Darwinism is a theory in crisis" but how much credibility do you have as someone who evidently has not even read Darwin and believe in Bronze Age tribal spooks? Zero.
Hopefully God will step in and help us here.
Post a Comment