Wednesday, December 20, 2023

Michael Bassett: Who needs Chippy when we have the Herald?

In case you are in any doubt, the New Zealand Herald, with TV1 in hot pursuit, has taken over the role of being the Labour-inspired Opposition to the new government. Chippy and Toni can take a holiday until the low-level editorial team at the Herald come to their senses, or the paper collapses.

The Herald’s policy became clear last week when it failed to carry in its print version an excoriating report by Auditor-General, John Ryan, on the defeated Labour government’s infrastructure blowouts. Instead, well buried on the Herald’s website, was a masterful summary of the 77-page report, showing that against advice from officials, between 2017 and 2023, Labour had rushed out $15 billion’s worth of infrastructure programmes leading to “chaotic, costly blowouts just months after they were first announced”. Because the projects weren’t ready when first announced, ministers then had to tip an extra $1.9 billion over them just to keep them going. The Auditor-General noted that Labour’s ministers were so poor at bookkeeping that to this day it is “difficult to determine from publicly available information all the initiatives that received funding”. The government’s schemes went over budget many times. There followed a lengthy, dismal account of warnings to ministers that went unheeded by Labour. Ryan added: “It concerns me that significant spending of public money continued to occur without appropriate processes for ensuring value for money and transparent decision-making.”

In the days of honest journalism, such a report would have been front-page news. “All the News that is fit to Print” used to be a slogan at the Herald’s masthead. Not any more. Instead, the paper implied the new ministry was derelict in its duty by not shelling out an unexpected $1.47 billion to KiwiRail for inter-island ferries. Reasonable people realise that Nicola Willis was correct to reject this request, the more so because it became obvious in subsequent days that there were cheaper options that KiwiRail appeared to have tossed aside. The praiseworthy contrast between the Auditor-General’s report on the previous government’s slack stewardship, and the new ministry’s caution, hadn’t occurred to the Herald.

Despite Herald journalists having been shown up last week to be one-eyed, the paper this week has continued in its role as the self-appointed Opposition. Tuesday’s front page is a full-blown attack on the new Prime Minister because he took Maori lessons paid for by the taxpayer when Leader of the Opposition. It now transpires that several other National MPs also had state-paid Te Reo lessons. They were available to Labour MPs in my day, and it is highly likely that there are several current Labour MPs who have taken freebies too. The only valid criticism of the PM is that he appears carelessly to have said at one stage that he thinks everyone should pay for them themselves. The Herald then ties his criticism of freebies to an earlier statement of his that is critical of public servants receiving bonus payments in perpetuity for no other reason that they had taken Te Reo lessons. This is stretching things. Certainly not comparing apples with apples. And then, to cap it all, Luxon cops a swipe for referring to the Ministry of Homes and Communities by the name Kainga Ora that was bestowed on it by the former Labour ministry. Quite correctly, the new government has directed that government departments should be called by their English names that everyone understands. But in this case, Labour had given the department a name that wasn’t a correct translation of its former title. What small games the Herald is playing!

As if this wasn’t enough coalition-bashing, Tuesday’s paper then carried a two-page “analysis” by Derek Cheng, about perceived shortcomings in the government’s promise to get tough on gangs. After nearly 40 column inches of barely relevant stuff on overseas efforts to control gangs, most of them unsuccessful, Cheng finally got around to talking to Paul Goldsmith, the new Minister of Justice. Goldsmith outlined the new government’s thinking. But he wasn’t let to speak for long: we were soon back to turgid expositions from Cheng and others, most of the two pages ending up of almost no use to man or beast. The paper then followed with ritual snide remarks about Luxon and Nicola Willis by the Herald’s in-house walking and cycling fanatic, Simon Wilson.

Quite why the new government has been given no leeway as it settles into office and comes up to speed hasn’t been explained by our mainstream media. TV ONE and Radio New Zealand are barely any better than the Herald with their comments, and are almost as quick to assume Chippy’s Opposition role.

Far be it from me to be a defender of the new Coalition ministry. While they get a bare pass mark from me for what they have done so far, they have a long way to go to fulfil the election hopes of their supporters. But if ministers are to receive a constant battering from so-called news reporters then we are in for a dismal three years of “gotcha” journalism. The only bright spot will be that the struggling Herald might well collapse.

Historian Dr Michael Bassett, a Minister in the Fourth Labour Government, blogs HERE. - where this article was sourced.


Anonymous said...

In the Petrie dish that is NZ and the very small readership of the Herald, every eyeball counts. Kicking the leader gets the right upset and the lefties love it. It matters not one jot that Labour have run the country into the ground. Todays budget will really highlight that fact.
This will be glossed over by Grannie Herald because a more newsworthy item will take the headlines.
Maybe 🤔. Will it rain on Christmas Day???

Don’t pay to read the rubbish NZHerald push for news. It’s biased opinionated crap.

Anonymous said...

One News' rubbish last night on whether government MP's knew the English name of Kainga Ora is another classic example of how low journalism has fallen in this country. Can't understand why the media is working so hard to lose what little public trust and confidence remains to it.

Anonymous said...

Time the PM quit learning Maori. It is such a problem. And it is not newsworthy. Who cares.

Rob Beechey said...

When we watch how the MSM refuses to critique the grinning buffoon, Robertson and his devastating legacy of indebtedness, the intelligent among us then realise how bias the corrupt media really is.

Tom L said...

European media detailed this week the capture in Germany of a leader of a 450 strong network of Hamas members planning terrorist attacks throughout Europe .

What does the New Zealand MSM report ? Nothing.

I wonder what dear Chloe would have chanted had such attacks taken place!

And I wonder if Green and Maori Party MP's would still be sitting in Parliament wearing the black and white checky scarf of a proscribed terrorist organisation ?

Anonymous said...

Clearly No more Tax Payer hand outs to the Media. Don’t allow it Winston….

Anonymous said...

Not to mention SBS News in Aus, which appears to be totally committed to the Maori cause as representing the true NZ. This time, Wednesday evening news in context of Luxon visit to Aus.

Anonymous said...

TvOne News are not as dumb as we might think. They will know exactly down to the last demographic detail who their viewership is, what they like and don't like, what they value and don't value, through extensive polls and surveys. Notice how many pet shows are on TV these days? This is essential for their advertising revenue. No doubt they have discovered the average viewer is not remotely interested in politics (unless it directly relates to them) so keep it "brief (ie soundbites), interesting and find as much drama and scandal as you can. Unfortunately, they are probably just giving the people (viewers) what they want - at the expense of what is best for them - unbiased reporting. Even political reporter Jason Walls on Newstalk ZB the other day admitted politics is "boring". If the reporters are bored then they are going to be looking for the drama too - instead of being informative. The political reporting in this country is treated like a joke - and reporters don't take it seriously enough.

Richard said...

Poor old Michael fading eyesight combined with failing mind means he actually can't read much in the Herald and what he does he can't understand. How mean of the Herald to print the straight fact of Mr Luxton's lessons. And how dare it say anything about the shiney new Government. If it was honest it would only print good things about it.

Because it was never mean to the previous Government was it Mr Michael. That line-up of communists posing as reporters - Mathew Hooten, Mike Hosking, Mrs Hosking, Barry Soper, Mrs Du Plessis Soper, the Joyce guy etc were just cotton wool for that government. As were the posse of comment writers who only slipped up every time there was a story about anything at all and lapsed into quite a bit of cricising the Government.

But that's OK Michael, writing about what you think is happening, as opposed to what is, is a good exercise in imagination. And old brains can keep ticking over quite well if that's all they are called upon to do.