Tuesday, September 20, 2022

Michael Bassett: Jacinda's waste of public interest journalism funds

Do we need any more evidence that this government tolerates waste of taxpayers’ money? The sight of a small army of New Zealand journalists in London covering the Queen’s funeral when there was a perfectly adequate, often superior coverage available from the BBC, warrants an investigation into the Public Interest Journalism Fund (PIJF) that features so large in our media’s calculations these days.

Eighteen months ago, following sob stories from the Main Stream Media (MSM), ministers devised a scheme for handing over $55 million of taxpayers’ funds to them so long as they signed up to the government’s bullswool version of the Treaty and didn’t bite the hand that feeds them. The money is payable until the next election. Editors, including Murray Kirkness and Shayne Currie of the New Zealand Herald, couldn’t get their noses into the taxpayer trough quickly enough. Same with Radio New Zealand, and the TV stations, all of them crying poverty because Covid had reduced their advertising revenue.

What happened after that was extraordinary. Newspapers promptly shed reporters and there are now only a few of them left. Papers have been fined down, there are fewer pages, more prominent advertising and lengthy banal stories. There is no longer much general news of interest to readers in the MSM. But came the Queen’s death and the TV stations and Radio New Zealand suddenly found they had money galore to send journalists to London on what amounted to taxpayer-funded trips of a lifetime. Radio New Zealand and the two main TV channels have been the most profligate. For some time now Lissette Raymer, based in London, has proven to be a thoroughly competent Kiwi journalist covering British and European affairs. There was no need for the services of all those TV 1 and TV3 journalists, none of them the equal of the BBC’s more knowledgeable, super competent staff producing all that the world needs to know about the monarchy and the funeral. The journalists’ costs for travel, accommodation and mourning dress will be enormous! And when traced back, it will have come out of our pockets.

As the polls here at home turn sour for Jacinda Ardern’s ministry, one suspects that the government and the MSM wanted to make sure that the Prime Minister’s tiny role at the funeral was given special coverage for New Zealand viewers; they didn’t trust the BBC to give Jacinda pride of place. Getting a whole lot of Kiwi journalists to the other side of the world also increased the likelihood that some would follow Princess Jacinda to New York to report on her speech at the United Nations. These days Jacinda’s minders are never happier than when the Prime Minister is off-shore, getting scraps of adulation from those who like her platitudes and toothy smiles, and haven’t had to suffer her appalling governance. And the journalists will get home just in time to celebrate the long-delayed day of commemoration for the Queen next Monday, a week after the official funeral ended. They will be here to eulogize Jacinda who bestowed an extra holiday upon us.

It’s high time this cynical manipulation of the media with taxpayers’ money used for Labour’s political purposes came to an end. When the PIJF was first introduced, the Herald assured us that the paper, founded in 1863, would stick to its historical principles. But it quickly became clear that lots of things were changing. Debate about Maori matters and the government’s policies virtually ceased. Critics were banned from papers. Analytical debate about what Jacinda, Nanaia Mahuta and Willie Jackson mean by co-governance went off limits. Anything said by Opposition spokespeople was to be rubbished. TV1 has been slightly more tolerant, RNZ less so. Force-feeding of the population with Maori words has become imperative, but ability to use a word or phrase does NOT equate to speaking a language.

What seems to be clear is that the MSM is terrified by the prospect that a change of government could mean the end of the PIJF. Already, Jacinda’s $55 million has almost gone, and I wouldn’t put it past this ministry to increase the sum to ensure she gets an easy ride to the 2023 election. There will be a lot of journalists grateful for their completely unnecessary jaunt to London to see the Queen.

Historian Dr Michael Bassett, a Minister in the Fourth Labour Government, blogs HERE.


Robert Arthur said...

Spot on. It is impossible to get any Letter to Editor published if faintly critical of Labour or of the pro maori stampede. The PIJF could be useful long term but the conditions would have to be made vastly more inclusive. Topics of great public inteest are very inadequately covered. In assembling a submission on the new zoning rules I door knocked in an older mid city street of mostly senior professionals. Only 1 of about 10 had any general idea of what is afoot, and then only the vaguest notion. Only the somewaht red herringtopic of Special Character housing has acquired significant coverage.

Anna Mouse said...

Well said Mr. Bassett. You know from experience how easy it is to get banned from the NZ Herald.....

That said the more embarrassing problem for the legacy media who have availed themselves of the odious PJIF 'loan' is that most of the cash was for the develpment of Maori stories by the hiring of Maori reporters.

Those newly annoited Maori journalists are going to find that without the PJIF cash the legacy media companies will have to either suck it up, sack them or dispose of some 'other' employees.

Remember that in the Pae Ora Health Bill anyone who is deemed non Maori is referred to as 'other populations' so it is an easy guess who may lose their jobs as the virtue signalling wokist CRT ideology now embedded takes its toll.

Anonymous said...

is it possible for national/act to promise that they will stop the funding, pass a law banning any such funding in future, ask media to take down all funded articles for good, and start with a clean slate?

Robert Arthur said...

The PIJFund and incredible willingness to spend on mostly puerile advertising has boosted newspaper fortunes beyond their dreams. The buyout of Stuff was a bargain. Did the buyer guess/know what was afoot? There is now an added disincentive to not cover many public interest topics. Because if the masses need to know governement will spend a fortune on advertising. $50 million is/was a fabulous amount but chicken feec compared with the millions tipped to maori for marae maintenace and a myriad other unaccountable bribes. Has any of the regular contributors maintained a tally of the race based spending?