It’s been an interesting, and worthwhile-watching, week so far – with the entertainment provided by Mr Scab-Ripper-in-Chief Peters turning the tables, so to speak, in holding media to account, a highlight. They don’t like it up ’em, do they Captain Mainwaring?
To see the industry figures run for cover while weakly lobbing back damp-squib Molotovs Mr Peters’s way in accusations of ‘baseless’ and ‘unfounded’ is quite remarkable, and hilarious. They know it. They didn’t just damage trust in their brand: they wrapped it around a lamp post in accepting tainted, conditional money. The last thing they need is Hipkins chipping in, snapping at Peters’s heels, with his toothless two-cents worth: “Hipkins pointed out the fund was set up when Peters was last deputy prime minister, and said he supported it at the time.” Which is, unsurprisingly, a fib.
Cabinet, including Peters, approved the financial vote for a news-media industry support package to be administered by NZ on Air of a yet-to-be-determined shape and scope in a paper which mentioned countering Covid mis/disinformation three times, but articles of the Treaty not at all.
NZOA scoped interested parties in early 2021 after Peters had left office, in which discussions industry players expressed disappointment that NZOA had the view of sponsoring specific content, rather than providing financial bridging support to the industry as a whole. They warned NZOA:
Cabinet, including Peters, approved the financial vote for a news-media industry support package to be administered by NZ on Air of a yet-to-be-determined shape and scope in a paper which mentioned countering Covid mis/disinformation three times, but articles of the Treaty not at all.
NZOA scoped interested parties in early 2021 after Peters had left office, in which discussions industry players expressed disappointment that NZOA had the view of sponsoring specific content, rather than providing financial bridging support to the industry as a whole. They warned NZOA:
Most interviewees mentioned that the Government was running a reputational risk in becoming involved in the direct funding of news.
In what would be described later as NZOA “effectively holding a ‘beauty contest’ to choose which proposed stories/investigations merited support”.
NZOA ignored those concerns and went on concocting, half-cocked and off-piste, deciding to “apply a Te Tiriti based partnership approach to the delivery of the PIJF” in ‘partnership’ with Te Mangai Paho whose function is ‘to promote Maori language and culture’. From that collaboration, the Frankenstein funding criteria emerged in which applicants were required to ‘Inform’ of some things, ‘Provide’ of others, ‘Reflect’ and ‘Encourage’ still more, but only one thing, one, were they to “Actively promote”, and that, as we all know, was the political arsenic “the principles of Partnership, Participation and Active Protection under Te Tiriti o Waitangi acknowledging Maori as a Ti Tiriti partner”. A purely political stance.
2 comments:
The left media love to attack winston because he represents the good old days of western values like law and order, equality for all, freedom to be self depracating or to tell jokes, that always brought people together in shared laughter. Eg Billy t james. He was funny because he took the mickey out of everyone, not just one racial group. The uk media are just as woke as our media in 2023, going nuts over " the royal racists" who never actually said anything racist. Why don't they just say " It is not racist or bias to wonder what parent a child may take after." But they won't even say that. Boris has said that wokery is destroying the west and he is right. Winston says the same thimg here. Well winston, many kiwis are right there with you. Keep calling out the left media on our behalf.
By not immediately coming clean the msm have effectievly prolonged the debate nd the public attention. The actaul wording of the PIJF conditons and of the NZ On Air Framework do not seem to have appeared in the msm yet. Until such time as the blatant words are published Winston can justifiably continue to The RNZ Mediawatch handling has been disgraceful. They too have studiously avoided the exact wordings and have wriggled and squirmed and waffled to claim no effective bribery.
Post a Comment