Pages

Saturday, January 6, 2024

Karl du Fresne: The Crewe murders revisited


No criminal case in New Zealand history has been more thoroughly worked over than the Crewe murders. The killing of Jeannette and Harvey Crewe (above) in their Pukekawa farmhouse in 1970 has been the subject of multiple trials, appeals, inquiries (including a royal commission), books, documentaries, countless newspaper and magazine articles and even a feature film. Could there be anything left to say?

Well, yes. Nothing startlingly new, necessarily – but The Crewe Murders: Inside New Zealand’s Most Infamous Cold Case, is still a gripping read.

The book, by journalists Kirsty Johnston and James Hollings, presents no compelling fresh theories and uncovers little in the way of previously unreported evidence – not surprisingly, given the degree to which the crime has been scrutinised over more than half a century. Crucially, the authors reach no conclusions about who was guilty of the murders, for which Arthur Allan Thomas served nine years in prison before being granted a royal pardon. But it’s a significant piece of work for all that, simply for the painstaking way Johnston and Hollings have reconstructed the crime and attempted to sift known facts from speculation, theory, rumour and scandalously flawed (and even faked) evidence.

The passage of time and the deaths of almost all the protagonists (Thomas himself being an exception – he’s still alive at 86) have taken much of the heat out of the Thomas controversy and enabled the authors to take what one hopes is a clearer, more detached perspective than was possible when it was a cause celebre. Nonetheless, the powerful and inescapable impression left by the book is that in its determination to protect itself and preserve the stability of “the system” (the authors’ term), the New Zealand establishment closed ranks. A gruesome double murder had been committed, leaving a baby orphaned, and a perpetrator needed to be found even if it meant constructing a palpably flawed case and ignoring its multiple failings and contradictions.

As the arguments against Thomas’s conviction became ever more compelling, police, judges, Crown lawyers and even prosecution witnesses resorted to increasingly desperate and shameful measures to cover shortcomings in the way the case was investigated and prosecuted. Cronyism and conflicts of interest repeatedly got in the way. Vital information was withheld from the defence or suppressed outright, police blatantly courted jurors and when serious questions arose about dodgy police exhibits, they were conveniently dumped at a tip and buried forever.

The government eventually so lacked confidence in the integrity and ability of the legal and judicial fraternity that it went to Australia to find a judge who could be trusted to head a royal commission of inquiry. The commission’s report came as a bombshell, describing Thomas’s conviction on the basis of false evidence as “an unspeakable outrage” – a phrase that deserves to be ranked alongside Justice Peter Mahon’s “orchestrated litany of lies” in respect of Air New Zealand’s evidence at the Mt Erebus inquiry.

All this came on top of an incompetent police investigation and multiple glaring inconsistencies and far-fetched scenarios in the evidence. It’s now accepted that Detective Inspector Bruce Hutton, who headed the murder inquiry, planted the cartridge case that helped convict Thomas. The royal commission said so. (Not only was Hutton never prosecuted, but then police commissioner Mike Bush paid tribute to him as a man of “integrity beyond reproach” at his funeral in 2013.)

In the end, it wasn’t the institutions that society trusts to uphold the law – the courts and the police – who ensured that justice was done in the Crewe case, but the media and a dogged group of citizen activists. Oh, and a couple of politicians: Robert Muldoon and his young justice minister Jim McLay, who made the courageous decision to issue Thomas with a pardon.

Decades later, all this makes sobering – no, make that chilling – reading. But The Crewe Murders can also be appreciated as an absorbing piece of social history. Pukekawa emerges as a feral sort of place – a New Zealand Ozarks with a history of Gothic murders where dark, clannish feuds, rivalries and suspicions simmered. (As an aside, I once visited Pukekawa in the late 1970s without knowing where I was. I was covering an international motor rally for The Listener and pulled in at an isolated service station to buy petrol and cigarettes. I spoke briefly to two surly men and got the distinct impression outsiders weren’t welcome. I came away with an inexplicably creepy feeling that I’ve experienced only two or three times in my life. It was only when I saw a sign a couple of hundred metres down the road that I realised where I was.)

Ultimately the book doesn’t get us any further, insofar as it doesn’t identify the killer(s) or even speculate on who it might have been, though you sense the authors were hoping they might break the case open, as any investigative journalist would. Notwithstanding his pardon, Thomas still can’t be definitively ruled out. (Hutton may have genuinely believed him to be guilty; what was unforgiveable was the fabrication of evidence against him.)

At the end of the book, I was left with one nagging thought. Harvey Crewe was a big man and his wife wasn’t slightly built. A dead body is an extremely awkward, cumbersome thing, not easily manhandled, yet someone managed to shift the two bodies from the Crewe farmhouse, wrap them in blankets, manoeuvre them into a vehicle, take them to the banks of the Waikato River and dump them in the water. It struck me that all this was highly unlikely to be accomplished unobserved by someone acting alone, yet the book is silent on this intriguing aspect of the case. Perhaps, after all, there’s yet another book still to be written …

The Crewe Murders is published by Massey University Press and sells for $45.

Karl du Fresne, a freelance journalist, is the former editor of The Dominion newspaper. He blogs at karldufresne.blogspot.co.nz. - where this article was sourced.

6 comments:

Peter said...

An intriguing case for sure and a damning indictment of the mentality of some within our Police force that were never held to account and in fact went on to promotion.

Meanwhile, more than a quarter of a century later, Scott Watson still resides in prison where two murders have yet to been proven; the bodies never found; and the convicting evidence fails to stack up to robust scrutiny.

There is still something very 'off" with our Police and judicial systems and the glacial speed at which they move.

Anonymous said...

I find it interesting that after all these years regarding the Crewe murders that the case still generates interest.

Pat Booth, journo - Auckland Star (?), whom I am sure you will recall, spent time & effort to place before the Public the inadequacy's of the Police evidence, from the first trial.

Regretfully, with the then Police investigation, we will never know what actually occurred and even your point re "moving bodies" - If I recall was one factor that was never really investigated at the time. Lots of theory, but no actual - "We believe..."!

Also there have been a previous book written about this case, I am going to "dig" in my library to locate.

Oh a question, your recollections of visiting Pukekawa, do you have, in the back of your mind, the tune Dueling Banjos and visions of Burt Reynolds?

Anonymous said...

When will they do a book on Scott Watson and the Milford Sound murders?

Anonymous said...

What scares me is that any of us through no fault of our own could be wrongly accused of a crime in NZ because of a less than scrupulous police force.

Doug Longmire said...

Message to both Anon's above.
There two excellent books on both the murders named above:-

"Beyond Reasonable Doubt" by David Yallop is the exhaustive and detailed dissection of the Crewe murder case and is essential reading.

"Trial by Trickery" by Keith Hunter is a similar book dealing with the Sounds "murders" and the appalling Police tactics re Scott Watson.

Both are essential reading for any New Zealander who is concerned about the underhand tactics, including evidence planting, that the Police will stoop to. In both cases above there were many witnesses who came forward with testimony that would have totally cleared the accused. But the Police simply ignored it.

OlderChas said...

I have read all the books mentioned here, but the one that really took my breath away was Lynley Hood's "A City Possessed" - an investigation of the railroading of Peter Ellis in what became known as the Christchurch Creche case. Absolutely shocking manipulation of evidence and mis-direction by our judiciary.